Perforce QA Wizard Pro vs Selenium HQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Perforce Logo
118 views|79 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
SeleniumHQ Logo
4,862 views|4,160 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Perforce QA Wizard Pro and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Pros →

"It has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only.""Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems.""It's not too complicated to implement.""The tool is easy to use and log in with respect to other tools. It is open-source. We can customize the product. I also like its security.""The solution is very easy to use. Once you learn how to do things, it becomes very intuitive and simple.""It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages.""In general, I would say that the API set is the most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is the ability to create automatic tests that can replicate human behavior."

More Selenium HQ Pros →

Cons
"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Cons →

"There should be standardized frameworks to build automation.""Improvement in Selenium's ability to identify and wait for the page/element to load would be a big plus. This would ensure that our failed test cases will drop by 60%.""When we upgrade the version, some features are missing. I want the product to include some AI capabilities.""The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing.""I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack.""We can only use Selenium HQ for desktop applications which would be helpful. We are only able to do online based applications.""We'd like to see some more image management in future releases.""The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."

More Selenium HQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is free to use."
  • "There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0."
  • "It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license."
  • "Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing."
  • "It is free."
  • "This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it."
  • "We are satisfied with the pricing."
  • "It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost."
  • More Selenium HQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate… more »
    Top Answer:Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
    Ranking
    41st
    Views
    118
    Comparisons
    79
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    Views
    4,862
    Comparisons
    4,160
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    403
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SeleniumHQ
    Learn More
    SeleniumHQ
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    QA Wizard Pro automates functional and regression testing of web, Windows, and Java applications, and load test web applications.

    Selenium HQ is an umbrella project that includes a number of tools and frameworks that allow for web browser automation. In particular, Selenium offers a framework for the W3C WebDriver specification, a platform- and language-neutral coding interface that works with all of the main web browsers.

    Selenium is a toolset for automating web browsers that uses the best methods available to remotely control browser instances and simulate a user's interaction with the browser. It enables users to mimic typical end-user actions, such as typing text into forms, choosing options from drop-down menus, checking boxes, and clicking links in documents. Additionally, it offers a wide range of other controls, including mouse movement, arbitrary JavaScript execution, and much more.

    Although Selenium HQ is generally used for front-end website testing, it is also a browser user agent library. The interfaces are universal in their use, which enables composition with other libraries to serve your purpose.

    The source code for Selenium is accessible under the Apache 2.0 license. The project is made possible by volunteers who have kindly committed hundreds of hours to the development and maintenance of the code.

    Selenium HQ Tools

    These three main Selenium HQ tools have powerful capabilities:

    • WebDriver: If you are just starting out with desktop or mobile website test automation, you will be using WebDriver APIs. WebDriver controls the browser and executes tests using the automation APIs that browser vendors provide. This gives the impression that a real person is using the browser. Because WebDriver's API does not need to be compiled alongside application code, it is not intrusive. As a result, you can test the same application that you push live.

    • IDE: Develop your Selenium test cases using an IDE (integrated development environment). The most effective way to create test cases is to utilize this simple Chrome and Firefox extension. IDE uses Selenium commands that are already in use to record user activity in the browser with parameters set by the context of the element. This is an excellent approach to learning Selenium script syntax and will save you time.

    • Grid: You can run test cases on several machines and operating systems with Selenium Grid. The local end controls how the test cases are triggered, and the remote end automatically runs the test cases after they are triggered.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Selenium HQ stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its driver interface and its speed. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:


    Avijit B., an automation tester at a tech services company, writes of the solution, “The driver interface is really useful. When we implement the Selenium driver interface, we can easily navigate through all of the pages and sections of an app, including performing things like clicking, putting through SendKeys, scrolling down, tagging, and all the other actions we need to test for in an application.”

    Another PeerSpot reviewer, a software engineer at a financial services firm, notes, “Selenium is the fastest tool compared to other competitors. It can run on any language, like Java, Python, C++, and .NET. So we can test any application on Selenium, whether it's mobile or desktop."

    Sample Customers
    Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix
    BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Retailer10%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Perforce QA Wizard Pro is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Perforce QA Wizard Pro is rated 5.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Perforce QA Wizard Pro writes "Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Perforce QA Wizard Pro is most compared with , whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.