We performed a comparison between Perforce QA Wizard Pro and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."
"It has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only."
"Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems."
"It's not too complicated to implement."
"The tool is easy to use and log in with respect to other tools. It is open-source. We can customize the product. I also like its security."
"The solution is very easy to use. Once you learn how to do things, it becomes very intuitive and simple."
"It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages."
"In general, I would say that the API set is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is the ability to create automatic tests that can replicate human behavior."
"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."
"There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."
"Improvement in Selenium's ability to identify and wait for the page/element to load would be a big plus. This would ensure that our failed test cases will drop by 60%."
"When we upgrade the version, some features are missing. I want the product to include some AI capabilities."
"The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing."
"I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack."
"We can only use Selenium HQ for desktop applications which would be helpful. We are only able to do online based applications."
"We'd like to see some more image management in future releases."
"The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."
Earn 20 points
Perforce QA Wizard Pro is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Perforce QA Wizard Pro is rated 5.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Perforce QA Wizard Pro writes "Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Perforce QA Wizard Pro is most compared with , whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.