Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 8, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]
Average Rating
5.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Selenium HQ
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (6th), Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability
The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.
Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation in testing processes sees improvement with multi-browser support and easier website interactions
Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks. The tool could simplify object identification, enabling users to generate XPaths without requiring detailed DOM understanding. Additionally, an automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."
"The ability to customize our approach to using Selenium HQ is particularly beneficial."
"It's not too complicated to implement."
"It supports most of the actions that a user would do on a website."
"We can run multiple projects at the same time and we can design both types of framework, including data-driven or hybrid. We have got a lot of flexibility here."
"Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems."
"Selenium WebDriver and Selenium IDE are useful."
"The tool is easy to use and log in with respect to other tools. It is open-source. We can customize the product. I also like its security."
"What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do."
 

Cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."
"Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks."
"One limitation of Selenium is that it is purely focused on web application testing."
"Selenium could offer better ways to record and create scripts. IDE is available, however, it can be improved."
"I have found that at times the tool does not catch the class features of website content correctly. The product's AWS configuration is also hard."
"One key area for improvement is the documentation."
"They should add more functionality to the solution."
"Selenium HQ could have better interaction with SAP products."
"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is open source."
"Selenium is free software so we do not pay licensing costs."
"This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it."
"The setup cost is open source or free."
"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
"It is all free."
"It is an open-source product, it is free for anyone to use."
"This is an open-source product so there is no cost other than manpower."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise33
Large Enterprise51
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
I will give an eight for my satisfaction with the pricing and licensing costs of Selenium HQ.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SeleniumHQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2025.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.