Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 8, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]
Average Rating
5.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Selenium HQ
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (7th), Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

AK
DevOps Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability
The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.
Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Manager consultant - Digital assurance Services at adrosonic
Automation in testing processes sees improvement with multi-browser support and easier website interactions
Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks. The tool could simplify object identification, enabling users to generate XPaths without requiring detailed DOM understanding. Additionally, an automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."
"The stability of the solution has been good, it is reliable we have not had any bugs."
"Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable."
"Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is picking up and entering values from web pages."
"Selenium is an open-source tool."
"It is a scalable solution."
"What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do."
"I do recommend Selenium HQ to other organizations because we are in a business that is primarily based on B2B interface."
 

Cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."
"Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be."
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
"It would be better if it accommodated non-techy end-users. I think it's still a product for developers. That's why it's not common for end-users, and especially for RPA activities or tasks. It's hard to automate tasks for end-users. If it will be easier, more user-friendly, and so on, perhaps it can be more interesting for this kind of user."
"Technical support isn't very good. Sometimes their recommendations were not very clear."
"There is a challenge with concurrent testing, where parallelization is not fully supported."
"​To simplify the development process, everyone needs to do a Selenium Framework to acquire the web application functions and features from Selenium methods."
"You need to have experience in order to do the initial setup."
"An improvement to Selenium HQ would be the inclusion of a facility to work on Shadow DOM."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is open source."
"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
"I have been using the open-source version."
"Selenium is free software so we do not pay licensing costs."
"Selenium HQ costs around $1000 per month, which is a bit high based on what they're offering."
"The product is open-source and free."
"It's open-source, so it's free."
"Selenium HQ is open source and our use of it in our company is provided for free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business41
Midsize Enterprise33
Large Enterprise51
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
I will give an eight for my satisfaction with the pricing and licensing costs of Selenium HQ.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SeleniumHQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2025.
879,443 professionals have used our research since 2012.