We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The interface is quite simple and easy to use, even for beginners."
"It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"Allowed us to develop and quickly release with confidence using cloud technologies."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"The robotic process automation has increased the confidence of business users."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"Pega BPM's documentation should be improved, especially for freshers or new trainees."
"Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
"The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface."
"What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
Earn 20 points
Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 55 reviews while Pillir is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM, whereas Pillir is most compared with .
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.