"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."
"The initial setup is fairly easy."
"I feel that the test plan and test tools are more manageable in TFS."
"The most valuable feature from my point of view is project management, which includes user stories as well as task management."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"The most valuable features are test case writing and bug tracking."
"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder."
"As far as queries are concerned, creating, grading, or customizing the queries as a primary requirement is very easy to do."
"The most valuable features are the dashboard and task-selection capability."
"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."
"It has been really dated. When you start to work more in an agile environment, it is not really that flexible. They tried to replicate the look and feel of Jira, but it is not quite there. It was nice to use in the past, but it is not as flexible now with the changing development environments and methodologies."
"There should be management of the project built-in."
"The interface can be improved and made more user-friendly."
"There are many things that I cannot do, and I have a lot of bugs."
"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"This solution is quite old and it is already being bundled as Azure DevOps Server."
"I would like to see the reporting features expanded so that I can see details on the users connected to all of the projects."
Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 10th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while TFS is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 17 reviews. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0, while TFS is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "Easy and very flexible usage. Provides a good picture of your progress and useful for a huge number of test scripts. Licensing model and the Panaya recorder installation can be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "Good traceability for managing workflows, but not flexible enough for agile environments". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Micro Focus UFT One and Tricentis qTest, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
