Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs SAP IQ comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while SAP is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.0. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 21 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

429 Views
210 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SAP IQ

Read 21 SAP IQ reviews

962 Views
414 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

SAP IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP IQ and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are popular database solutions in the data management category. SAP IQ is favored for its cost-effectiveness and support, but Oracle MySQL Cloud Service has the upper hand in feature richness, justifying its higher expense.

Features: SAP IQ's strengths include rapid query speed, efficient data compression through its columnar storage, and quick loading times, making it highly suitable for analytics. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is noted for its seamless integration, robust feature set, and scalability, providing automatic database management and flexibility for extensive database administration.

Room for Improvement: SAP IQ faces hurdles with marketing and support, with a need for better training programs and enhanced integration capabilities. It also lacks a robust backup system. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service requires better technical support and improvements in workflow functionalities, particularly in memory management and syntax compatibility during upgrades.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP IQ, primarily supporting on-premises deployment, struggles with customer support due to insufficient specialists, leading to slow solution delivery. In contrast, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers a wider range of deployment options, including public and hybrid clouds, with efficient global support and quick issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: SAP IQ is deemed cost-effective, with competitive pricing and a reasonable licensing model, which users find advantageous given its robust capabilities. On the other hand, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, despite its higher cost, provides good value for enterprises due to its extensive features and open-source nature, offering high scalability and integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP IQ Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP IQ

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

SAP IQ

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP IQ is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Columnar database, so pulling records is easy but there isn't enough documentation for installation

I've seen very few SAP IQ systems in recent years. So people are moving away from SAP IQ In the last three years, I've rarely encountered customers using it. Fewer systems with SAP IQ usage among our customers. Most of them have moved on to HANA. There are parallel products, and there are also viable alternatives from AWS, so many have migrated to those.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's performance is good."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is flexible and is an open-source product."

"The product is good for tuning."

"All the features are excellent."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"Unbeatable speed and compression with a colummn-structured relational database."

"The primary benefit of SAP IQ is its ability to limit the expansion of the costly SAP HANA database, which has limited storage capacity. This necessitates a form of data management that involves moving data from SAP HANA to SAP NLS, which is essentially archiving. This allows us to retain access to the data via a link whenever it is required."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The column-based technologies (basically all the database for ITP) are used for SAP IQ. It is used as a column-based solution."

"Valuable features for us include the compression, speed, fast response time, and easy object maintenance."

"Columnar storage allows high compression, high load rates and high query performance."

"All data is compressed and indexed, allowing for fast execution of transactions."

"IQ is a very high-performance and high-transaction database."

More SAP IQ pros

Cons

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"The product has many bugs."

"Improvement could be made in the workflow, particularly when it comes to making changes or implementing certain functions."

"The tool’s stability must be improved."

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

"The solution should offer memory management."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"The solution works best when combined with other SAP solutions. If the environment has other systems other options might be better."

"Multiplex is very problematic. There are consistency problems in the metadata, meaning it is possible to lose metadata consistency. You should make sure you have healthy backups."

"The tool gets stuck sometimes."

"Concurrency and functional error messaging."

"The room for improvement would be the marketing of the product, because this product is much better than advertised."

"The organization who owns the product does not support it well and appears not to be doing significant development for the future."

"The primary negative aspect is the cost, which can be a challenge due to the economic conditions in Peru."

"There is very little documentation available."

More SAP IQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The product is expensive."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"It is an open-source product."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"Negotiation is very important."

"The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades."

"It's not that costly. So, the pricing is cheap."

"Negotiate based on the features required."

"The cost of implementation is about $3,000."

"Evaluate all options; check to see if you need expensive add-ons."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

40%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP IQ?

IQ implementation costs about three thousand dollars. It's less expensive compared to alternatives like Teradata Base in terms of transactional efficiency.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP IQ?

The primary negative aspect is the cost, which can be a challenge due to the economic conditions in Peru.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP IQ?

I worked on implementing new databases, migration data in production, and developer environments with SAP IQ.

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 59% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 41% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Snowflake vs SAP IQ

Compared 23% of the time

SAP HANA vs SAP IQ

Compared 17% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP IQ

Compared 13% of the time

Apache Hadoop vs SAP IQ

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs SAP IQ

Compared 7% of the time

More SAP IQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

July 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP IQ

June 2025

Download SAP IQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase IQ

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

SAP

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP IQ

July 2025

Free Report: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP IQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP IQ and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP IQ report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.