Oracle BPM vs TIBCO iProcess Suite comparison

Oracle and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while TIBCO is ranked #40. Oracle holds a 1.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Oracle BPM

Read 25 Oracle BPM reviews

1,463 Views
1,171 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Read 2 TIBCO iProcess Suite reviews

291 Views
197 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle BPM

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle BPM and TIBCO iProcess Suite compete in the business process management domain. Oracle BPM holds the upper hand for users within the Oracle ecosystem due to its seamless integration and competitive pricing, while TIBCO iProcess Suite proves advantageous for those needing robust features and extensive third-party integrations.

Features: Oracle BPM supports unified process orchestration and real-time analytics, making it an ideal choice for businesses prioritizing streamlined operations. It offers comprehensive support within Oracle's ecosystem, enhancing its appeal for companies already utilizing Oracle products. TIBCO iProcess Suite is recognized for its flexibility and component-based architecture, which facilitate extensive integration options. Its robust nature appeals to organizations that require sophisticated, scalable solutions. The ability to easily connect with third-party applications is a notable highlight of TIBCO iProcess Suite.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPM offers straightforward deployment, particularly for existing Oracle users, backed by extensive support resources. This results in efficient integration and reduced deployment time within Oracle environments. TIBCO iProcess Suite permits versatile deployment but typically requires more initial setup effort. However, it receives praise for its commendable customer service that provides effective guidance during the configuration process, ensuring user needs are met effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPM is known for its cost-effective setup, making it attractive for organizations utilizing Oracle's suite. The reduced integration costs contribute to a favorable return on investment. On the other hand, TIBCO iProcess Suite requires a larger initial investment, but its ability to deliver a high ROI through scalability and a comprehensive feature set often justifies the higher price for businesses needing complex, customizable solutions. The primary pricing distinction lies in Oracle’s attractiveness for existing users versus TIBCO’s value derived from more extensive implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Oracle BPM is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO iProcess Suite is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

SatyajitSethy

Architect at Netcracker

Provides a complete workflow from testing to production and can handle a million concurrent requests

The user interface is very good. Once you understand it, it's easy to define rules and do any configurations. It comes with an embedded WebLogic application server, which you have to deploy automatically. Once you run the given binary, it will automatically keep everything on the backend. You'll have to create an instant database, and maintain or manage it based on the rules engine. After that, your system is ready to test. The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production. Throughout the testing, everything was good. Many customers are interested in the rules engine. A lot of requests pass through BPM because it's integrated with a lot of other applications or sub-applications.

Read full review

Samy Abushanab

Senior Software Development Team Leader at sejel

An easy-to-use solution with great integration

It involves a lot of investment. The learning curve is not similar to other products, like K2. Regarding the user interface, I have to access workflows and define and manage the processes on the variant of a Windows application, which is not accessible if you don't have access from the client to install it on the workstation. And most of the solutions we're currently evaluating are web-based. Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing. It has lots of elements. It's not user-intuitive compared to other products. Other than that, the licensing model is our main concern.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to use in a business processing suite."

"It is quite scalable and can be applied to enterprise-level organizations effectively."

"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."

"It is easy and cheap."

"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."

"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."

"The solution provides extensive functionalities."

"The support is good."

More Oracle BPM pros

"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."

Cons

"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."

"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."

"Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter."

"It would be good if they could provide some additional connectors or an application developer environment for microservices."

"The product must reduce its cost."

"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."

"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

More Oracle BPM cons

"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We received the product packaged into the Oracle database solution."

"This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."

"The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses."

"Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."

"I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."

"As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."

"The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."

"The licensing model is good."

More Oracle BPM pricing and cost advice

"The price could definitely be lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

31%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle BPM?

The solution provides extensive functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle BPM?

The licensing is expensive. It needs to be more affordable, especially in the Kenyan market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPM?

Oracle BPM should ensure its product is aligned with current technology by keeping up with advancements like AI. There are delays in offering the latest technology, so there is a need to be more re...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Oracle BPM

Compared 27% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Oracle BPM

Compared 26% of the time

IBM BPM vs Oracle BPM

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Oracle BPM

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle BPM Competitors

Apache Airflow vs TIBCO iProcess Suite

Compared 57% of the time

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM vs TIBCO iProcess Suite

Compared 43% of the time

More TIBCO iProcess Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM

April 2025

Download Oracle BPM product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download TIBCO iProcess Suite product report

Also Known As

Oracle Business Process Management

iProcess Suite

Overview

The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

Oracle

TIBCO iProcess Suite is a proven and comprehensive suite of business process management (BPM) software that enables organizations to streamline the internal and external processes and tasks that span and make up their business.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie

Delta Air Lines, Detroit Water and Sewerage, DVLA, E-Plus, FedEx, Geisinger Health System, ING Turkey, Kempen & Co., KPN, LCL, Merck, Merial

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.