Opsview vs Pandora FMS comparison

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

6,419 Views
3,402 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Opsview

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Opsview and Pandora FMS are two prominent IT monitoring solutions. Opsview has the upper hand with its ease of use and robust alerting system, while Pandora FMS stands out with its flexibility and customization options for tailored solutions.

Features: Opsview offers superior alerting capabilities, comprehensive monitoring templates, and straightforward configuration and management. Pandora FMS provides extensive customization, scalability, and supports a wide range of data sources and integrations.

Room for Improvement: Opsview requires better documentation, more advanced reporting features, and enhancements in agent performance. Pandora FMS needs to address its initial setup complexity, improve user support, and refine certain customization processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview's deployment is simple with responsive customer support. Pandora FMS has a more complex deployment but offers robust support and detailed customization assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Opsview has reasonable pricing with a good return on investment. Pandora FMS pricing is fair given its high customization potential, though it involves higher initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Opsview vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: September 2026).

Opsview vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Opsview

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

41st

Ranking in Server Monitoring

19th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

36th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

66th

Ranking in Server Monitoring

26th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

58th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

38th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (59th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Opsview is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Opsview	1.0%
Pandora FMS	0.7%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer1898607

Partner Technical Support & Escalation Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Real-time dashboards have improved our deployment monitoring and incident response

We are using Opsview ourselves, rather than being a consultant or a reseller. We do not use its auto-discovery feature. We do not utilize its API driven architecture. I do not know what metrics we use to assess the effectiveness of Opsview's hybrid IT monitoring. Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does. I do not know if Grafana has any other advantages besides better stats, as I am not involved in that side. Based on my experience, I would still recommend Opsview to others as it is good for what it does. I gave this review a rating of 8.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Over the past three years, we've grown by about 200%, and the system has been able to manage that growth."

"Excellent customer support from Cerner."

"Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does."

"Afterwards, they were impressed by how easy monitoring could be, and they no longer had to edit large text files in order to configure hosts and service checks."

"Opsview, though not the least expensive Nagios-based commercial monitoring product offers excellent value for performance which rivals expensive commercial products from the major IT vendors; it is well worth the money paid for it."

"There are several valuable features for us, including ease of configuration of monitoring of new hosts/services, worker redundancy and load balancing, and the fact that it’s compatible with the plethora of existing Nagios plugins available on the web."

"We use this solution for internal monitoring our own cloud platform because we are a public cloud provider, and we also use it for monitoring purposes on behalf of our clients."

"The most valuable feature of Opsview is the ability to clone the services when you're monitoring something out of the test setup."

More Opsview pros

"The official forum is active enough to answer most of the high-end technical questions that you may have."

"The monitoring system within this solution is very good. It is easy to use and navigate, and makes issue alarms easily viewable."

"Pandora FMS provides us with a general report (graphical) about all of the connected devices, which helps with planning new stations and tracking them."

"Pandora FMS is a powerful monitoring system that has enabled us to identify and resolve IT infrastructure problems before they affect critical business processes."

"Pandora's architecture is interesting; it's open so you can easily extend and enhance it, it's simpler to customize Pandora compared to other solutions, and it's also scalable enough to support large environments."

"I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly."

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"The solution is so lightweight that with only 4GB of ram, it allows keeping track of up to two hundred agents from a single console."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"Reload time: Although there have been major gains in the time to process reloads, I think that there is still room for improvement in this area."

"In Opsview 4.6.3, there is no provision for making bulk changes to monitored servers via the GUI, though it is possible to custom-script bulk changes via the API."

"It's probably the priciest option of all its main competitors."

"It can be a little bit flaky with the agent on VMware."

"We're already evaluating v5.0 and to tell the truth, there's a couple of things that we found really useful in previous versions that for some reason they have removed."

"Pricing and a few certain aspects in the solution needs to be improved."

"We have had some stability issues, but that is largely because we're using an unsupported database."

"Some of the graphics on Opsview could be improved."

More Opsview cons

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"The product lacks APIs for integration with other systems and we have issues with monitoring."

"An update to the Android app would be appreciated."

"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."

"I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity."

"I think some improvements to the Android app would be good."

"Pandora FMS is relatively new, and the interface with the older version crashes at times. We have several different operating systems, such as Linux and Windows, and Pandora does not run as well in these."

"Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box. You can work around these limitations with the help of other tools like Grafana. The shortcomings are mostly on the graphical side. The built-in report generators are a bit limited in some areas."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not cheap. I think that the pricing is a little bit on the high side."

"I would rate pricing a seven out of ten, where ten is the highest price."

"The solution is priced similarly to other tools offering similar features."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

20%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Opsview Monitor?

There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well. Grafana does have features that I think m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opsview Monitor?

Our primary use case is monitoring our deployments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Opsview Monitor?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Opsview

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

More Opsview Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

Nmap vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios Core vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Opsview

Download Opsview product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Also Known As

Opsview Monitor, Opsview Enterprise

No data available

Overview

Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.

Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.

What are Opsview's most important features?

Flexible Alert Framework: Allows customized alerting rules to suit diverse needs.
Web GUI and Dashboard: Intuitive interfaces for real-time monitoring and data visualization.
Integration with Nagios: Compatible with a wide range of plugins for extended functionality.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports multiple users with isolated data views.
API and Automation: Streamlines management and operational workflows.
Distributed Monitoring: Ensures reliable performance across global networks.

What benefits or ROI are users experiencing?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure with ease.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifying initial setup and ongoing adjustments.
Accurate Alerting: Reduces false positives, improving response efficiency.
System Stability: Consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive integration and customization options.

Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.

ITRS

Pandora FMS offers comprehensive monitoring for IT infrastructure and services, supporting hybrid environments and enhancing operational efficiency with customizable architecture and seamless tool integration.

Pandora FMS provides a user-friendly platform for monitoring servers, network devices, and applications across virtual and cloud environments. Its agent options, centralized management, and high availability configurations allow it to support extensive network infrastructures. Offering robust alarm systems and lightweight operation, it adapts to enterprise needs, whether large or small. Users benefit from flexible metrics and plugins, although improvements in automation, analytics, and expanded API integration are anticipated. Challenges include interface instability in older versions and the need for improved dashboard customization, real-time monitoring, and cloud integration.

What features does Pandora FMS offer?

All-in-One Monitoring: Supports a wide range of platforms and devices for comprehensive visibility.
Customizable Architecture: Integrates seamlessly with external tools for tailored solutions.
High Availability Configurations: Ensures continuous monitoring and operation.
Flexible Metrics and Plugins: Enables tailored monitoring setups for diverse needs.

What are the benefits and ROI?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes and improves time management.
Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructures without sacrificing performance.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing IT tools and environments.
Comprehensive Coverage: Provides extensive oversight across a variety of platforms and environments.

In specific industries, Pandora FMS is utilized for IT service supervision, infrastructure monitoring, and network device management. Organizations leverage it to maintain network quality, ensure compliance, predict issues, and manage inventory and security. It supports both remote desktops and clients' systems, making it valuable for generating SLA reports and monitoring hybrid server environments. Pandora FMS's adaptability allows it to serve diverse sectors by facilitating efficient supervision and control.

Sample Customers

IBM, BT, Cisco, Sky, UPS, Capgemini, Visolit, Fujitsu Services UK, UKCloud, Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cornell University, Incomm

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Opsview vs. Pandora FMS