ReadyAPI Test and OpenText UFT Developer compete in the software testing tools category. ReadyAPI Test seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and integration capabilities.
Features: ReadyAPI Test supports SOAP, REST, and JDBC testing with Groovy scripting, provides data-driven testing, and integrates well with systems for better test coverage. OpenText UFT Developer supports multiple technologies, integrates with developer tools, and facilitates shift-left testing.
Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test could improve in test organization, IDE integration, and memory management. OpenText UFT Developer faces challenges with complexity, demands for development skills, and suggests better browser compatibility and performance improvements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test is mainly on-premises with ease of use and decent support, though cost reviews are mixed. OpenText UFT Developer offers both on-premises and cloud deployment with responsive support but has a steeper learning curve.
Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is valued for improving automation but is criticized for high costs, especially in Europe. OpenText UFT Developer has high licensing costs, suitable for large enterprises, although cost is prohibitive for smaller organizations.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
