Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Silk Test vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 1.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
OpenText Silk Test
Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews
  • 926 Views
  • 704 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Read 52 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews
  • 954 Views
  • 401 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and Visual Studio Test Professional are two notable solutions in the testing software category, each with unique advantages. OpenText Silk Test seems to have the upper hand in cross-platform automation and cost efficiency, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional offers comprehensive integration and robust debugging tools.

Features: OpenText Silk Test provides excellent cross-platform testing, strong automation capabilities through 4Test, and efficient integration with Java and C#. It supports distributed test runs and offers user-based licensing suitable for budget-conscious organizations. Visual Studio Test Professional offers deep integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, an intuitive user interface, and valuable debugging tools. It also supports multiple programming languages, including C# and .NET, and offers IntelliSense for efficient coding.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve by simplifying its initial deployment process and reducing the learning curve for new users. A more streamlined interface and enhanced documentation would also be beneficial. Visual Studio Test Professional might enhance support for non-Microsoft technologies and offer more affordable pricing options for smaller teams. Expanding features beyond the Microsoft environment could increase its flexibility and appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional provides straightforward deployment, particularly in Microsoft-centric environments, with reliable support for workflow integration. OpenText Silk Test, while more complex to deploy, offers thorough support during setup to ensure smooth implementation.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test offers a lower initial investment, making it attractive for organizations focused on automation efficiency and quick return on investment. Visual Studio Test Professional, although having a higher initial cost, provides sustained ROI through productivity gains and deep integration within Microsoft-dependent environments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
20th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (8th), Test Automation Tools (17th)
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 1.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional1.0%
OpenText Silk Test1.1%
Other97.9%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SrinivasPakala - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available
While we are performance testing the engineering key, we need to come up with load strategies to commence the test. We'll help to monitor the test, and afterward, we'll help to make all the outcomes, and if they are new, we'll do lots and lots of interpretation and analysis across various servers, to look at response times, and impact. For example, whatever the observations we had during the test, we need to implement it. We'll have to help to catch what exactly is the issues were, and we'll help to see how they can be reduced. Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are. The solution needs better monitoring, especially of CPU.
Read full review
ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides extensive extensions and plugins for seamless AI product development
Our primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional is as a development tool. We develop software primarily in Python, specifically for applications related to artificial intelligence. We use frameworks like PyTorch for training models and developing applications using these models. This tool…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."
"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."
"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."
"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."
"The statistics that are available are very good."
"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."
"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."
"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."
"Searching is extensive and helpful."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
More Visual Studio Test Professional pros
 

Cons

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."
"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."
"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."
"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."
"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."
"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is expensive."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is expensive."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"The solution is quite expensive."
More Visual Studio Test Professional cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."
"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
"I think that the pricing is quite good."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."
"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution."
"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."
"The tool is affordable."
"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."
More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Retailer
6%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Performing Arts
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?
The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Silk Test?
The pricing could be improved.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Silk Test?
The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.
See all answers
What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?
The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test
Compared 35% of the time
Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test Logo
Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test
Compared 18% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test Logo
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test
Compared 13% of the time
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Silk Test Logo
ReadyAPI vs OpenText Silk Test
Compared 11% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Silk Test Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Silk Test
Compared 8% of the time
More OpenText Silk Test Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 20% of the time
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 17% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 15% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 15% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 13% of the time
More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Silk Test
September 2025
OpenText Silk Test reportDownload OpenText Silk Test product report
Buyer's Guide
Visual Studio Test Professional
September 2025
Visual Studio Test Professional reportDownload Visual Studio Test Professional product report
 

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
No data available
 

Overview

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
OpenText
Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
September 2025
Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.