OpenText Silk Test vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

773 Views
384 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 52 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

387 Views
208 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and Visual Studio Test Professional are two notable solutions in the testing software category, each with unique advantages. OpenText Silk Test seems to have the upper hand in cross-platform automation and cost efficiency, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional offers comprehensive integration and robust debugging tools.

Features: OpenText Silk Test provides excellent cross-platform testing, strong automation capabilities through 4Test, and efficient integration with Java and C#. It supports distributed test runs and offers user-based licensing suitable for budget-conscious organizations. Visual Studio Test Professional offers deep integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, an intuitive user interface, and valuable debugging tools. It also supports multiple programming languages, including C# and .NET, and offers IntelliSense for efficient coding.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve by simplifying its initial deployment process and reducing the learning curve for new users. A more streamlined interface and enhanced documentation would also be beneficial. Visual Studio Test Professional might enhance support for non-Microsoft technologies and offer more affordable pricing options for smaller teams. Expanding features beyond the Microsoft environment could increase its flexibility and appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional provides straightforward deployment, particularly in Microsoft-centric environments, with reliable support for workflow integration. OpenText Silk Test, while more complex to deploy, offers thorough support during setup to ensure smooth implementation.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test offers a lower initial investment, making it attractive for organizations focused on automation efficiency and quick return on investment. Visual Studio Test Professional, although having a higher initial cost, provides sustained ROI through productivity gains and deep integration within Microsoft-dependent environments.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (8th), Test Automation Tools (20th)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

SrinivasPakala

Director Consulting Expert at Cgi Deutschland KG

Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available

While we are performance testing the engineering key, we need to come up with load strategies to commence the test. We'll help to monitor the test, and afterward, we'll help to make all the outcomes, and if they are new, we'll do lots and lots of interpretation and analysis across various servers, to look at response times, and impact. For example, whatever the observations we had during the test, we need to implement it. We'll have to help to catch what exactly is the issues were, and we'll help to see how they can be reduced. Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are. The solution needs better monitoring, especially of CPU.

Read full review

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

Valuable performance and libraries but needs compatibility improvements

We use Visual Studio Test Professional to develop our internal applications for our company The performance of Visual Studio Test Professional is valuable. Additionally, there are many libraries that I can use, and it supports cross-platform functionality. Visual Studio Test Professional is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."

"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."

"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."

"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."

"The user interface is very friendly."

"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."

"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."

"This product is a nine out of ten."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pros

Cons

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"There are not any specific areas for improvement since there are so many libraries and frameworks already available."

"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."

"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."

"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."

"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."

"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."

"Its UI could be better."

More Visual Studio Test Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"I think that the pricing is quite good."

"The pricing is expensive."

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very expensive solution."

"Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution."

"It is a price-effective solution"

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."

More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 50% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 15% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 13% of the time

Qt Squish vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 12% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

June 2025

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

May 2025

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Overview

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

OpenText

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

May 2025

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.