OpenText Operations Orchestration vs Oracle BPEL comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Process Automation category. OpenText is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in PA, compared to Oracle’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Read 26 OpenText Operations Orchestration reviews

1,029 Views
473 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Oracle BPEL

Read 4 Oracle BPEL reviews

585 Views
579 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Oracle BPEL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle BPEL and OpenText Operations Orchestration compete in process and service orchestration. Oracle BPEL is favored for its integration and support, while OpenText Operations Orchestration is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Oracle BPEL offers potent integration capabilities, enabling seamless connections across platforms, streamlined SOA integration, and advanced tracking of integration processes. OpenText Operations Orchestration automates complex workflows, supports multiple IT domains such as Cloud and DevOps, and provides a centralized administration system for diverse operational management needs.

Room for Improvement: Oracle BPEL could enhance its user interface for greater ease of navigation, offer more extensive customization options, and expand capabilities for non-SOA environments. OpenText Operations Orchestration might improve its customer support to facilitate better user interaction, further refine its deployment processes for less complex environments, and offer more detailed documentation to aid in user adoption and troubleshooting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle BPEL provides a structured deployment model that supports efficiency and offers accessible customer support resources. OpenText Operations Orchestration boasts deployment flexibility, adapting easily to complex environments, though its customer service interactions could be enhanced for greater user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BPEL is often viewed as reasonably priced, offering good ROI with reliable support and efficient operations. OpenText Operations Orchestration may require higher initial expenditure but is seen as a worthwhile investment due to its extensive capabilities and potential for long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Ranking in Process Automation

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (20th)

Oracle BPEL

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of OpenText Operations Orchestration is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPEL is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Increases productivity with automation and robust orchestration capabilities

The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available. There are ready-made workflows, integration with other products, a nice user interface, and reporting. The tool is flexible, agent-based or agentless. It allows significant automation and has robust orchestration and reporting capabilities. It is easy to configure and use, leading to increased efficiency across our IT processes.

Read full review

Jozef Ivanic

Senior Business Analyst at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees

Support for human tasks despite challenges with protocols and adapters

It depends on your needs. Oracle BPEL is suitable for enterprise-wide systems. However, if you're building something smaller or don't know precisely what you need, it's better to start with something smaller. Oracle is a comprehensive bundle, and buying it exclusively for Oracle BPEL doesn't make sense. I'd rate the solution six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is good functionality-wise. I am impressed with the tool's flexibility in customization."

"The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available."

"In my environment, if I want to shut down all tools in one shot, I can create a workflow and run the workflow to shut down all tools in one go."

"It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options."

"It's very stable. If you ask me for the success rate metrics, it's more than 90% for both."

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

"The most valuable feature is the support for human tasks."

"The solution is very seamless and fast."

"The product has everything we need."

Cons

"There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues."

"The tool's UI needs to be improved. It needs to have better administration features in future releases."

"I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios."

"Only the tool's support can be a drawback where improvements are needed."

"The price is an area that should be addressed because the price is high."

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems."

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

"The solution's integration with SAP should be seamless because some formats are not accepted in SAP but are accepted in Oracle BPEL."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive. I rate the tool a six if one is cheap and ten is very expensive."

"The cost is very high compared to anything else available."

"I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product."

"The product is moderately priced."

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Performing Arts

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Operations Orchestration?

The pricing is medium, and the automation helps in cost and time savings, resulting in substantial value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Operations Orchestration?

I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios. This would save time by not starting from scratch each time.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Operations Orchestration?

This tool serves as a central management hub, allowing seamless control of various IT processes via one console. I rate this solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPEL?

They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems. It should be better if the SAP adapter were included in the bundle.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle BPEL?

We primarily use Oracle BPEL for process automation. It is used for workflows for documents, data transfers, and other processes implemented for our customers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle BPEL?

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 41% of the time

Control-M vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

Appian vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Operations Orchestration Competitors

Camunda vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 38% of the time

Flowable vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 31% of the time

Control-M vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 17% of the time

Bonita vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 14% of the time

More Oracle BPEL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Orchestration

August 2025

OpenText Operations Orchestration report

Download OpenText Operations Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

July 2025

Download Oracle BPEL product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Orchestration, Operations Orchestration, HPOO, HPE Operations Orchestration

BPEL Process Manager

Overview

OpenText Operations Orchestration (OO) automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automate using low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrate with an API rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows.

With OO you can automate and orchestrate infrastructure automation and IT processes from service fulfillment to incident remediation, cloud service delivery, and disaster recovery.

Operations Orchestration offers the tools needed to provide enterprise wide orchestration capabilities:

Design automation workflows with a low-code/no-code designer canvas, content library, and API generator wizards.
Govern your automation in one place and centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows in large, high availability environments.
Schedule workflows and make sure that SLAs are met and workflows execution happens when you need it.
Expose REST APIs to programmatically invoke orchestration from any external source.
Automate difficult interfaces with RPA robots that mimic screen based human actions.
Follow business and operational metrics to understand the value and the health of your orchestration environment.
Expose orchestration scenarios as services to your end users in an easy to use Self-Service catalog.

Operations Orchestration offers the following components:

OpenText

Oracle BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Process Manager is a tool for designing and running business processes. This product provides a comprehensive, standardsÂbased and easy to use solution for creating, deploying and managing crossÂapplication business processes with both automated and human workflow steps â all in a serviceÂoriented architecture. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a powerful integration tool for the enterprise. Its ability to connect to external systems and process, mixed with its support for a variety of presentation technologies makes it an ideal tool for defining and implementing business process logic.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Casablanca INT, Internet Initiative Japan, Railway Information Systems, Samsung SDS, and Turkcell.

Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP, Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Intelligent Pathways, DVZ Datenverarbeitungszentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GmbH, Arqiva

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.