We performed a comparison between OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery."The technical support is excellent."
"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."
"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."
"MVISION offers decent protection."
"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."
"Provides protection against threats."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"The independent modules are very good."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"There were minor UI bugs."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"I would like to see more automation."
"One suggestion is they should reduce the constant notifications. Whenever I open my laptop, there are too many notifications from McAfee, and it gets annoying."
"Upgrading to new versions isn't easy and it can take a long time. Also, other solutions' tamper protection features are better than FireEye's. Clients should have access to our local information, but they shouldn't change settings on the system itself."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"The solution lacks device control."
"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."
"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 6th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 18th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 48 reviews. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response". OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery and kCura Relativity, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.