OpenText Business Processing Testing vs ZAPTEST comparison

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews

2,049 Views
1,598 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and ZAPTEST are competing products in the field of software testing automation. OpenText is more favorably viewed in terms of support and pricing, while ZAPTEST is considered superior for its advanced features.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing offers robust enterprise-level testing, integrated business process testing, and a focus on security. ZAPTEST features multi-platform compatibility, scriptless automation, and flexibility across environments, enhancing its appeal for diverse tech ecosystems.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance the simplicity of its deployment process, reduce initial setup costs, and improve user accessibility. ZAPTEST may benefit from lower upfront costs, expanded feature documentation, and improvements in reporting capabilities for users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText requires significant time and resources for comprehensive deployment but offers reliable support. ZAPTEST provides more streamlined deployment with agile support and customer accessibility, serving fast-paced operations well.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves higher initial setup costs with significant long-term ROI through thorough testing mechanisms. ZAPTEST, potentially more expensive upfront, offers quicker returns by maximizing efficiency and reducing labor costs through its faster test cycles and broader automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. ZAPTEST Report (Updated: September 2026).

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. ZAPTEST

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ZAPTEST

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZAPTEST is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ZAPTEST	1.5%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	1.0%
Other	97.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

it_user362916

System engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

We can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself.

* Using this tool, we can automate test cases even before the deployment of an application. This can be done by scanning objects from UI mock-ups or screenshots. * One script multi-run technology reduces scripting effort and budget by which you can run one unique script to test multiple platforms. * We can write one code and run it in multiple browsers (Chrome, IE, Firefox anything) and operating systems (Android, Windows, anything). * PDF validation, average colour validation, etc. are better and stable. * We can literally automate anything (not necessarily web applications) using ZAPTEST as it works exactly as a human eye and doesn't dig into application codes. * Partial OCR and block recognization are game changers. * JIRA and ALM integration

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"Using ZAPTEST, we can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself."

"On average, I get two cycles per week and that only requires the attention of two people; it saves us a lot of time and gets us to production quicker."

"Customer service has been ZAPTEST's forte; very prompt and helpful."

"The biggest thing this product has done for us is allow us to automate a feature that other commercial and open source tools couldn't do for us."

"Customer Service: This is where they truly shine! If we suggest a feature, a new version appears in days with that feature fully realized and working."

"Our ROI is 100%."

"Customer service is excellent."

Cons

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"We have used multiple data files types as inputs to our existing automation and this product is currently only supporting CSV."

"We cannot have more than one Object Repository for one test."

"A few objects on the .NET platform are not getting identified precisely among similar objects."

"I would say the test results features could be made more advanced with options like pie charts, graphs, etc. To be able to visualize the data would be helpful to us."

"The documentation is not keeping up with the rapid development, and updates are very fast."

"The save function should be fixed so that I no longer have to add a space to a step and then follow it with a backspace to reenable the save icon."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 15% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 6% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST

Compared 12% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs ZAPTEST

Compared 11% of the time

Sauce Labs vs ZAPTEST

Compared 6% of the time

Selenium HQ vs ZAPTEST

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ZAPTEST

Compared 5% of the time

More ZAPTEST Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Business Processing Testing

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download ZAPTEST product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

ZAPTEST is an advanced automation tool providing robust solutions for streamlining business processes across multiple platforms. Designed for efficiency, it offers users streamlined automation capabilities tailored to their needs.

ZAPTEST supports both functional and performance automation, enhancing business operations through comprehensive testing capabilities. Its cross-platform versatility allows users to automate web, desktop, and mobile apps, facilitating seamless integration into existing workflows. Using ZAPTEST, teams can optimize testing cycles, minimize manual intervention, and ensure consistent output quality, boosting team productivity while maintaining flexibility and scalability.

What are ZAPTEST's most valuable features?

Cross-Platform Automation: Enables users to conduct thorough testing on web, desktop, and mobile applications.
Script-Less Testing: Simplifies the automation process by allowing non-programmers to create automated tests easily.
Real-Time Reporting: Provides instant feedback, enabling quicker decision-making and issue resolution.
Parallel Execution: Facilitates simultaneous test execution to save time and resources.
API Testing: Allows for the efficient verification and performance assessment of application programming interfaces.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation leads to faster test cycles, saving time and resources.
Reduced Costs: By minimizing manual efforts, ZAPTEST lowers labor costs associated with testing.
Improved Accuracy: Consistent test execution reduces errors and improves software reliability.
Scalability: Easily adapts to changing business demands, supporting growth.

ZAPTEST seamlessly integrates into various industries, including finance, healthcare, and technology, adapting its functionality to meet industry-specific requirements. In finance, it enhances security and compliance testing; in healthcare, it ensures systems meet regulatory standards, while in technology, it supports fast-paced development and deployment cycles.

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. ZAPTEST