OpenText Application Quality Management vs SpecFlow comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. OpenText is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Tricentis is ranked #18. OpenText holds a 9.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to Tricentis’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

5,872 Views
1,762 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SpecFlow

Read 4 SpecFlow reviews

501 Views
346 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

OpenText Application Qualit...

SpecFlow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Application Quality Management and SpecFlow compete in the software testing and quality assurance category, often seen as complementary. SpecFlow appears to have the upper hand for .NET BDD integration, while OpenText excels in test management.

Features:OpenText Application Quality Management offers comprehensive test management, robust tracking capabilities, and integrates well with automation tools. SpecFlow excels with its support for .NET frameworks, provides Gherkin language support for writing tests, and enhances collaboration with business and product teams through BDD.

Room for Improvement:OpenText could improve in the ease of deployment, particularly for smaller teams, enhance its BDD support, and reduce the learning curve for new users. SpecFlow could expand its feature set to better integrate with non-.NET environments, enhance test reporting capabilities, and offer more robust enterprise-level support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText is suitable for larger enterprises with its structured deployment and strong customer support, but may be challenging for smaller teams. SpecFlow offers a straightforward deployment process and relies on community and documentation support, making it easier for developers already familiar with .NET.

Pricing and ROI:OpenText often requires a higher initial investment, with ROI realized over time through comprehensive testing solutions. SpecFlow has a lower cost of entry, ideal for smaller teams or startups, offering immediate ROI when integrated with existing .NET frameworks. While OpenText justifies its cost with extensive capabilities, SpecFlow provides an affordable BDD option for .NET environments.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Application Quality Management vs. SpecFlow Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. SpecFlow

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (4th), Quality Management Software (1st)

SpecFlow

Ranking in Test Management Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 9.0%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SpecFlow is 2.5%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	9.0%
SpecFlow	2.5%
Other	88.5%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

Sudipta Das Biswas

Senior QA Automation Engineer at AMCS Group

Ensures efficient testing and validation of both business and technical requirements

In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up might require more effort compared to some licensed products that handle everything. However, SpecFlow is a framework, not an automation tool, so the actual automation is carried out through tools like Selenium. Despite setup complexities, the framework itself serves its purpose effectively. In future releases of SpecFlow, it would be beneficial to have some built-in methods for common actions like opening and closing browsers or implementing loops. Having predefined libraries for these functions would save automation engineers time and make the framework more user-friendly. While I'm not sure if such features already exist, they could be valuable, especially for those working on web applications. It would provide a generic and optimized solution that anyone can easily implement without worrying about performance issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can do your development from start to finish: starting with the requirements, ending with defects, and testing in-between."

"It has a good response time."

"The enhanced dashboards capabilities are useful for senior management to view the progress of releases under the portfolio in one go and also drill down to the graphs."

"ALM Quality Center's best features are the test lab, requirement tab, and report dashboard."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is its support for many automation technologies."

"Being able to manage tests as this is something very difficult to find in other products."

"Reporting was the main thing because, at my level, I was looking for a picture of exactly what the coverage was, which areas were tested, and where the gaps were. The reporting also allowed me to see test planning and test cases across the landscape."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

"One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities."

"The initial setup is easy."

"SpecFlow's best feature is the ability to add additional layers to the programming."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is unit testing...It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework."

Cons

"It can be quite clunky, and it can easily be configured badly, which I've seen in a couple of places. If it is configured badly, it can be very hard to use. It is not so easy to integrate with other products. I've not used Micro Focus in a proper CI/CD pipeline, and I haven't managed to get that working because that has not been my focus. So, I find it hard. I've often lost the information because it had committed badly. It doesn't commit very well sometimes, but that might have to do with the sites that I was working at and the way they had configured it."

"I'm looking at more towards something more from a DevOps perspective. For example, how to pull the DevOps ecosystem into the Micro Focus ALM."

"The support is not good and the documentation is not consistent."

"There needs to be improvement in the requirement samples. At the moment, they are very basic."

"There are great features, however, transitioning between partners and managing a large number of test cases can be time-consuming."

"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center could improve how the automation process works. Addiotnlally, the parallel execution needs to be optimized. For example, if multiple users, which are two or more users, are doing an execution, while we execute the cases, I have seen some issues in the progress."

"It is nice, but it does have some weaknesses. It's a bit hard to go back and change the requirement tool after setup."

"The UI is very dated. Most applications these days have a light UI that can be accessed by pretty much any browser; QC still uses a UI which has a look almost the same for the past 20 years."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

"SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool."

"I'd prefer in TFS if we could be writing test cases, not in the old classical version. We should be writing in Gherkin and then automatically have it convert that Gherkin test case into SpecFlow feature files."

"Regarding improvement, it would be good if SpecFlow could provide chain testing, which it currently doesn't allow."

"SpecFlow would be improved with the addition of functionality reporting, which would be really helpful for automation testing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Most vendors offer the same pricing, though some vendors offer a cheaper price for their cloud/SaaS solution versus their on-premise. However, cloud/SaaS solutions result in a loss of freedom. E.g., if you want to make a change, most of the time it needs to be validated by the vendor, then you're being charged an addition fee. Sometimes, even if you are rejected, you are charged because it's a risk to the entire environment."

"The enterprise pricing and licensing are reasonable."

"HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models."

"The full ALM license lets you use the requirements tab, along with test automation and the Performance Center. You can also just buy the Quality Center edition (Manual testing only), or the Performance Center version (Performance Testing only)."

"Seat and concurrent licensing models exist; the latter is recommended if a large number of different users will be utilizing the product."

"Only major companies that can afford it use OpenText ALM."

"It's a perpetual license."

"The solution is priceed high."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

"SpecFlow is open-source and free of charge."

"SpecFlow is an open-source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	162

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow

Compared 37% of the time

TestRail vs SpecFlow

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs SpecFlow

Compared 22% of the time

TFS vs SpecFlow

Compared 18% of the time

More SpecFlow Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

January 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow

January 2026

Download SpecFlow product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

SpecFlow+

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. SpecFlow

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Application Quality Management vs. SpecFlow

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Application Quality Management vs. SpecFlow and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Application Quality Management vs. SpecFlow report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.