OpenText Application Quality Management and OpenText Silk Central compete in the quality management software category. OpenText Silk Central seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, although OpenText Application Quality Management is more cost-effective with favorable pricing and support.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management provides robust test management and automation with integration capabilities, focusing on performance efficiency. OpenText Silk Central offers risk-based testing, cross-platform integrations, and versatile application testing features.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management could enhance cloud deployment options, expand integration with third-party tools, and improve user interface aesthetics. OpenText Silk Central may benefit from reducing setup complexity, improving documentation for advanced features, and optimizing initial cost structures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central provides flexible deployment, emphasizing cloud solutions, backed by responsive customer service. OpenText Application Quality Management offers straightforward deployment, typically on-premises, with reliable support, but lacks a cloud-first strategy.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management is more budget-friendly with lower setup costs and quicker return on investment, ideal for organizations with constrained budgets. OpenText Silk Central has higher initial costs but promises long-term value through its extensive feature set, offering significant ROI for businesses prioritizing comprehensive testing and future-proofing their technology stack.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
It is designed more for Waterfall than Agile, so it is not as efficient as it could be.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
The reporting is probably the most valuable feature.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 12.7% |
| OpenText Silk Central | 1.7% |
| Other | 85.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
