We performed a comparison between OpenText ALM / Quality Center and OpenText Silk Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
Earn 20 points
OpenText ALM / Quality Center is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 20 reviews while OpenText Silk Central is ranked 19th in Test Management Tools. OpenText ALM / Quality Center is rated 7.6, while OpenText Silk Central is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText ALM / Quality Center writes "A good stand-alone test management tool, but its pricing could be improved". On the other hand, OpenText ALM / Quality Center is most compared with OpenText ALM Octane, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, OpenText UFT One and Cognizant ADPART, whereas OpenText Silk Central is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and TestRail.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.