Observer GigaStor vs SCOM comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Viavi Solutions and Microsoft are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Viavi Solutions is ranked #88, while Microsoft is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7. Viavi Solutions holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Viavi Solutions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Observer GigaStor

Read 7 Observer GigaStor reviews

3,243 Views
2,043 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

11,676 Views
7,823 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Observer GigaStor

SCOM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

SCOM and Observer GigaStor are competing products in network and system monitoring. SCOM often seems to have the upper hand due to better pricing and support, while Observer GigaStor's advanced features justify its higher investment for some businesses.

Features: SCOM provides robust monitoring capabilities, infrastructure health, application performance, and predictive analytics, which are advantageous for proactive management. Observer GigaStor offers deep packet inspection and forensic data replay, ideal for detailed network examination. SCOM is suitable for organizations needing broad system insights, whereas Observer GigaStor is aimed at in-depth network analysis.

Room for Improvement: SCOM could enhance its network traffic analysis features, provide more detailed instructional support, and improve integration with non-Microsoft environments. Observer GigaStor could lower its upfront costs, simplify its deployment process, and enhance its interface for ease of use. These improvements could broaden their appeal across diverse organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM's deployment is typically less complex, providing seamless integration with Microsoft environments, and it offers adequate support. Observer GigaStor deployment can be intricate due to its specialized hardware requirements, though it excels in offering detailed instructional support. SCOM is easier to deploy in environments relying on Microsoft technologies, while Observer GigaStor demands more setup but offers extensive guidance for deployment and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: SCOM presents a lower initial setup cost and secures value through integrated Microsoft services, resulting in a faster ROI for companies with existing Microsoft ecosystems. Observer GigaStor involves a higher upfront investment due to specialized hardware and focuses on long-term value through its analytic capabilities. SCOM offers a cost-effective entry point, whereas Observer GigaStor aims for high-value returns on more specialized network data analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Observer GigaStor vs. SCOM Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Observer GigaStor vs. SCOM

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Observer GigaStor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

88th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Troubleshooting (15th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (6th)

SCOM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Observer GigaStor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SCOM is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	1.4%
Observer GigaStor	0.5%
Other	98.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Jeroen-Dubbelman

Director at Bitrate

Aids significantly in the threat-hunting process and provides a score-based evaluation of user experience

There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues originate from the network, server, client, or application. Additionally, it facilitates in-depth analysis of application dependencies. The retrospective network analysis capability of Observer GigaStor has been beneficial. It's a pivotal feature for network performance solutions. However, I prefer to consider the entire solution suite - GigaStor, along with GigaFlow and Apex - for comprehensive network visibility and monitoring. So, I prefer to integrate all three solutions to provide the best visibility. They complement each other well, with Apex aggregating and correlating data from both GigaStor and GigaFlow to enhance environmental understanding and troubleshooting efficiency.

Read full review

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can help to write your rules, organize firewalls, your block, and also your protocols and IP address to come in or out of your network."

"Go take a look at it. It's a great product and has great capabilities."

"This solution allows us to see exactly what is going on in the network and we can very quickly solve issues with users."

"I also have the ability to see an application's performance, to see what's going on, why a network is slow, why this program for this user is experiencing a delay or some network issue"

"If you have the opportunity, I would strongly encourage you to get it, because it makes the IT experience easier and more flexible, by providing the ability to see things in your networks like the directory packet label."

"I have no regrets using this product, I am very satisfied for what I paid for it and for the things I am able to do with the product."

"It's able to capture packets and, after a long time, you can come and use that information; to check, to analyze - everything you would want to do. So it's very good and helpful if you want to protect your data. It is stored in a certain place where you can access it every time you want to analyze it."

"There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues originate from the network, server, client, or application. Additionally, it facilitates in-depth analysis of application dependencies."

More Observer GigaStor pros

"It's easy to use."

"The dashboard is in a class of its own, with a whole other range of competing products in management of datacenters and cloud environment."

"Anything that can be accessed via SNMP commands, SCOM can retrieve via SNMP Gets."

"SCOM should be a good choice for fresh IT environments based on Windows servers or switching from open-source monitoring tools."

"SCOM integrates several systems and offers correlation features, like setting up everything around Active Directory or DNS."

"We've had outages at two am and three am that was automatically resolved by SCOM saving us time and money."

"When it comes to monitoring Microsoft servers, it is very useful."

"We heavily rely on SCOM as our pro-active monitoring tool, preventing various problems and resolving issues quickly with the informative detail raised in SCOM alerts, which assists our department in being pro-active in resolving issues with servers and services rather than reactive."

More SCOM pros

Cons

"The interface is pretty complex, so for the average user, it takes a while to get up to speed with it. I would like it to be more user-friendly."

"I would like to have more than 4TB of storage available in the portable version of this solution."

"Graphics need improvement. Because a lot of the information there you have to input first in some case to have full potential. It could be more automated."

"GigaStor feeds into Apex. So, the area where there could be improvement would be in artificial intelligence. For example, the incorporation of more advanced machine learning or AI capabilities could enhance its functionality."

"There are some issues, in our environment that puts processing restraints on the Gigastor when turning on trending data to be sent to APEX."

"Maybe the graphical user interface could be simplified to allow people to use it more easily. It's already good, but they can work more on it to make it even easier."

"The Observer Console UI is consistent and stable, but could use some updating to be more modern."

"I would like to see better support for monitoring Unix-based systems."

"There could be more integration of SIM in the solution."

"They can focus more on cloud monitoring instead of on-premise monitoring. We should be able to monitor cloud-related applications. They can include this feature in the next release. If it is in the cloud, we can have scalability by using Kubernetes. The container is containerized, packaged, and managed using Kubernetes. This feature is not there in SCOM. Going forward, if they can focus on that, it will be great."

"The solution can be improved by expanding to cloud usage."

"We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting."

"Third-party tools have had to be created to make SCOM management pack creation more efficient and effective. However, this weighs down the application as it just adds a resource requirement, which is ballooning the size of the necessary storage and all that for essentially substandard components."

"I would like to see more standard libraries for the market solutions, out of the box, that you don't need to do a lot of work on."

"Very high administrative burden, requires constant maintenance."

More SCOM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It depends on the requirements you have. There are three types of license. There's the updates license, the work group license, and the workstation license."

"It's quite expensive."

"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."

"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."

"The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support."

"SCOM's pricing is average."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."

"The pricing is good, and it's part of their system center suite."

"The pricing and licensing are fair."

"We have to pay for a license and the price is fine for us."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SCOM?

My usual use case for SCOM is as an administrator role where I create reports and provide system configuration for Linux and installation of the SCOM agent. I handle deploying and upgrading the age...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wireshark vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 6% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 6% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 5% of the time

Viavi Observer Platform vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 5% of the time

More Observer GigaStor Competitors

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Observer GigaStor

September 2026

Download Observer GigaStor product report

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

September 2026

Download SCOM product report

Also Known As

No data available

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

Overview

Observer GigaStor provides detailed network visibility and data capture for efficient troubleshooting and analysis. It's a robust tool designed to manage today’s complex network environments, offering reliability and performance insights.

Observer GigaStor specializes in long-term network traffic capture, delivering comprehensive forensic analysis capabilities. It stands as a trusted resource for IT departments aiming to resolve network performance issues swiftly. By capturing and storing packets with high precision, it aids in identifying both current and past anomalies, ensuring network health and performance continuity through proactive monitoring.

What are the key features of Observer GigaStor?

Long-term Data Capture: Enables storage of vast amounts of data for extensive historical analysis.
Comprehensive Protocol Support: Offers support for diverse protocols, enhancing troubleshooting accuracy.
Retrospective Analysis: Provides the ability to trace issues back to their origin point, improving issue resolution speed.
Scalability: Adapts to network growth without sacrificing performance capabilities.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from reviews?

Increased Troubleshooting Efficiency: Provides quicker resolution times, reducing network downtime.
Enhanced Network Visibility: Improves understanding of network performance and traffic patterns.
Reduced Operational Costs: Limits the need for manual troubleshooting, saving on labor costs.
Improved Decision Making: Data insights aid in strategic planning for infrastructure improvements.

Observer GigaStor's implementation spans across various industries, from telecommunications to finance, where maintaining robust and secure network performance is crucial. Its ability to analyze and retrieve historical network data supports compliance and operational stability demands in these sectors.

Viavi Solutions

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Cisco Systems, Hawaiian Telecom, Renown Health, State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, Allstate Insurance, Jack Henry & Associates, United States Airforce, US Bank, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Chicago Board Options Exchange

Dialog Telekom

Buyer's Guide

Observer GigaStor vs. SCOM

September 2026

Free Report: Observer GigaStor vs. SCOM

Find out what your peers are saying about Observer GigaStor vs. SCOM and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Observer GigaStor vs. SCOM report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.