Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oasis vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oasis
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (38th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (5th)
RSA Identity Governance and...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (23rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Oasis is designed for Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) and holds a mindshare of 24.7%, up 14.0% compared to last year.
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, on the other hand, focuses on Identity Management (IM), holds 1.3% mindshare, down 1.3% since last year.
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Oasis24.7%
Astrix27.1%
Entro Security11.7%
Other36.5%
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)
Identity Management (IM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle1.3%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud18.4%
Microsoft Entra ID11.8%
Other68.5%
Identity Management (IM)
 

Featured Reviews

Harshul Nayak - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features
The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) solutions are best for your needs.
872,008 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
12%
University
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Media Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes.
What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...
What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SecurID
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
Find out what your peers are saying about Entro Security, Astrix Security, GitGuardian and others in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM). Updated: October 2025.
872,008 professionals have used our research since 2012.