We performed a comparison between Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) and RackWare HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
Earn 20 points
RackWare’s Advanced Hybrid Cloud Management Suite provides agility in a multi-cloud environment, with rapid deployment, a quick time-to-value, lowering IT expenses while still optimizing application performance. It delivers economical multi-cloud / multi- tenant cloud computing to the Enterprise, allowing them to increase value to their customers while remaining competitive. The Suite is built on the RMM Platform. RMM has been used for years to replicate, mobilize, and protect enterprise applications in the cloud and data center. RMM provides proprietary replication technology, analytics, highly definable policy engines, and extensive API’s for integrating with existing applications and cloud stacks. With its automated policy engines, application development is accelerated and enables an easy path from test, development, to production. It provides reporting of usage statistics and predictive cost analysis, enabling automatic metered billing and ensuring cost management.
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 19th in Cloud Management with 5 reviews while RackWare HCM is ranked 65th in Cloud Management. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6, while RackWare HCM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". On the other hand, Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with Azure Stack, VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS and Microsoft Azure, whereas RackWare HCM is most compared with .
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.