NinjaOne vs Statseeker comparison

NinjaOne and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NinjaOne is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.4, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. NinjaOne holds a 0.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NinjaOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

NinjaOne

Read 21 NinjaOne reviews

7,114 Views
1,352 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

900 Views
855 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NinjaOne

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and NinjaOne are competing products in the network monitoring and IT management space. NinjaOne generally has the upper hand due to its comprehensive IT management capabilities and extensive feature set.

Features: Statseeker provides detailed network visibility, real-time analytics, and is designed for scalability in large-scale deployments. These features cater specifically to enterprises in need of deep network insights. NinjaOne offers not only network monitoring but also endpoint management, patching, and automation, providing a more versatile IT management solution.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its deployment process to reduce configuration time and make its system more user-friendly. Its customer support could be more emphasized as part of its core offerings. Additionally, integration with third-party tools could be more seamless. NinjaOne could benefit from optimizing its initial setup costs to be more competitive. Enhancing advanced network analytics to match a dedicated network monitoring tool could be another area for growth. Offering more granular reporting options might also improve its appeal to data-driven decision-makers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NinjaOne is recognized for its swift deployment process and reliable customer support, allowing for quick integration. Statseeker, although powerful in its offerings, may require more configuration time and technical expertise, impacting its deployment speed. Customer service for Statseeker is adequate but not a highlighted selling point.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker presents a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. However, NinjaOne's higher initial costs are often justified by its extensive features and the potential for substantial ROI through improved IT efficiency. Statseeker's pricing structure emphasizes cost-effectiveness, while NinjaOne focuses on value-driven pricing, enabling businesses to leverage its comprehensive solution for significant returns on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed NinjaOne vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NinjaOne

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (6th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Remote Access (14th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (9th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), Patch Management (7th), MSP Backup (2nd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NinjaOne is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NinjaOne	0.8%
Statseeker	0.4%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Not Joseph Pearson

Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials

Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support

NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"NinjaOne's best feature is its monitoring."

"It helps us to be able to have visibility into the overall performance of the servers, laptops, and desktops that we are managing currently."

"NinjaOne has a feature where we can create custom scripts that we can run on devices remotely."

"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."

"The best feature of NinjaOne is the SLA system. Every IT person can check their performance, how long it takes to resolve an issue, and how many SLAs are breached."

"The solution's most valuable feature is related to its remote access...I know that NinjaOne's technical support is good."

"The tool's most valuable feature is third-party application updates."

"The software's automation tools have solved critical deployment problems for small businesses."

More NinjaOne pros

"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."

"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."

"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."

"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"This solution has helped us to proactively identify issues and push some of those fixes down to tier one."

"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"The inclusion of XENServer and Proxmox as virtual platforms in NinjaOne is currently missing."

"The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best."

"The graphical user interface could be improved."

"There was a lot of delay with NinjaOne's ticketing system. For example, when a user creates a ticket and raises an issue, it would take 30 to 40 minutes to appear on the IT side. So the time delay issue is the main point."

"It can have more integrations with third-party providers, such as Deep Instinct. They do partner with certain antivirus or remote access tool partners, but they can increase their portfolio to have more choices."

"I would like to see the software reduced to focus on inventory or remote help tools since many of its current functionalities are not needed."

"The inclusion of XENServer and Proxmox as virtual platforms in NinjaOne is currently missing."

"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."

More NinjaOne cons

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."

"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."

"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."

"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."

"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."

"We haven't seen an ROI."

"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."

"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."

"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."

"NinjaOne's price is fine since my workplace is an educational institution, so we get the product at a really good price considering that we do not pay taxes, making the prices very fair and worth the product."

"Its pricing is great."

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."

"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."

"The product's pricing depends on the number of PCs or devices."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for NinjaOne is fairly cheap and easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

One challenge I face with NinjaOne is that when remoting in, sometimes the end user has a resolution with very tiny text, making it necessary to zoom in to see what the other computer is displaying...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?

My main use case for NinjaOne is ticketing. I use NinjaOne for ticketing in my daily work to keep track of all the computers and their uptime, and to generate tickets if there are any alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs NinjaOne

Compared 6% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

Tanium vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs NinjaOne

Compared 4% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 29% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 19% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne

January 2026

Download NinjaOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

January 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

NinjaOne provides comprehensive remote monitoring, troubleshooting, and automation via a user-friendly web interface. With a robust mobile app and integration capabilities, it appeals to small businesses seeking cost-effective management solutions.

NinjaOne is designed to streamline IT operations through its remote monitoring, patch management, and automation capabilities. Its integration with Bitdefender and ongoing feature enhancements are valuable, although users express a desire for more third-party compatibility and smoother deployment processes. The platform's SLA system enhances performance tracking, while its continual development is a key attraction. Despite some calls for a more intuitive graphical interface and advanced reporting features, it remains an asset for managed service providers and businesses adapting to cloud-based environments.

What are the most important features?

Remote Monitoring: Essential for real-time insights into network and device performance.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks, increasing efficiency in IT management.
Patch Management: Timely updates for software and system security.
Mobile App: Ensures alerts and management capabilities on the go.
Third-Party Integrations: Enhances functionality by working with tools like Bitdefender.

What benefits can users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Appeals to small companies seeking budget-friendly IT solutions.
Performance Tracking: Improved SLA system aids in efficient performance monitoring.
Enhanced Management: Effective use of scripts and policies streamline operations.
Client Interaction: Better remote session management and asset control.

NinjaOne is widely employed across different sectors for server and workstation management, network infrastructure oversight, and client computer support. With its cloud-based framework, it supports managed service providers and businesses shifting to the cloud, ensuring seamless software deployment and improved asset management, making it integral to modern IT environments.

NinjaOne

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Free Report: NinjaOne vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NinjaOne vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.