NGINX App Protect vs Symantec Web Application Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
F5 Logo
3,450 views|2,597 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
228 views|186 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NGINX App Protect and Symantec Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall.""NGINX App Protect's best features are auto-learning, which creates a profile of applications that are deployed, bot protection, and force protection, which lets you configure your brute force policy and alert for and prevent brute force attacks.""The stability of the product is very impressive since it handles 60,000 to 70,000 requests or transactions per second.""The policies are flexible based on the technologies you use.""We were looking for a product that is capable of complete automation and a container based solution. It's working.""It has the best documentation features.""The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is the reverse proxy.""It is a very good tool for load balancing."

More NGINX App Protect Pros →

"The setup was straightforward.""The solution has an up-to-date data repository to deal with external threats.""The interface is user-friendly."

More Symantec Web Application Firewall Pros →

Cons
"They could provide a better user interface.""The price of NGINX App Protect could improve.""I encountered issues with NGINX App Protect while trying to upgrade custom rules.""It's challenging if you need to go for a high throughput.""The product's user interface is an area with shortcomings as it can be quite confusing for users, making it an area where improvements are required.""Right now, the tool doesn't provide an option revolving around update feeds, specifically the signature update option in the UI.""The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary.""NGINX App Protect would be improved with integration with Shape and F5 WAF, which would make it easy for users to manage all their web application security with a single solution."

More NGINX App Protect Cons →

"Sometimes scanning slows down the endpoints.""It would be an improvement if the management dashboards were not reliant upon Java.""I'm not convinced that it's necessary the best solution going forward in the future."

More Symantec Web Application Firewall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
  • "Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
  • "Really understand the licensing model, because we underestimated that."
  • "There are no additional fees."
  • "NGINX is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is reasonable because NGINX operates on an instance basis."
  • "There is a license needed to use NGINX App Protect."
  • "There are not any additional costs we had to pay to use NGINX App Protect."
  • More NGINX App Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution has yearly, three-year, and five-year subscriptions.
    Top Answer:NGINX App Protect could provide a better user interface.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,450
    Comparisons
    2,597
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    334
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    228
    Comparisons
    186
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
    Symantec WAF, Blue Coat Protecting Web Applications
    Learn More
    Overview

    NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

    • Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
    • Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
    • Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
    • Complying with security and regulatory requirements

    NGINX App Protect offers:

    • Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
    • F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
    • Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
    • High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
    • Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
    • Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
    • Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
    • Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
    • Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
    • Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security

    The Symantec Web Application Firewall (WAF) enables you to secure and accelerate your web applications.

    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Insurance Company17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NGINX App Protect is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 19 reviews while Symantec Web Application Firewall is ranked 37th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). NGINX App Protect is rated 8.2, while Symantec Web Application Firewall is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "Capable of complete automation but is costly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Web Application Firewall writes "An excellent up-to-date data repository handling external threats successfully". NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Noname Security, whereas Symantec Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and WAPPLES.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.