NetWitness NDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

NetWitness and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. NetWitness is ranked #55, while WithSecure is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.5. NetWitness holds a 0.5% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of NetWitness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

NetWitness NDR

Read 15 NetWitness NDR reviews

2,568 Views
745 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,518 Views
1,503 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetWitness NDR

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

NetWitness NDR and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are leading solutions in the cybersecurity landscape. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of deployment, customer service, and overall value for its price.

Features: NetWitness NDR has comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities, granular data analysis, and robust features. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection stands out with straightforward integration, strong real-time protection, and accessibility.

Room for Improvement: NetWitness NDR could benefit from enhanced user experience, more intuitive configuration options, and fewer usability challenges. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection needs improved reporting tools, more detailed alerting mechanisms, and specific feature enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetWitness NDR deployment can be complex, requiring considerable effort and expertise, though it offers reliable customer service. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is noted for its straightforward deployment process and effective, accessible customer support.

Pricing and ROI: NetWitness NDR is typically positioned at a higher price point, with users divided on its cost-effectiveness. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI due to its lower setup costs and faster deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed NetWitness NDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetWitness NDR

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

55th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (40th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (57th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (25th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (19th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (37th)

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of NetWitness NDR is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection	1.0%
NetWitness NDR	0.5%
Other	98.5%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1799727

Manager, IT Security Operations at a non-profit with 11-50 employees

Reliable and good support but can be expensive

I have no real complaints about the solution. Threat detection could be better. They need to enhance their threat intelligence feeds. We would like to have more IOCs or more trade intelligence to not only rely on the intelligence of the engineer in charge but to have some threat intelligence and some seeds of IOCs and to have the host have some artificial intelligence to reduce the number of false positives. I don't see this solution being very scalable. The solution is pricey.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ability to isolate the machine when there are malicious files."

"Technical support is knowledgeable."

"It is stable. We have been using it for some time, without any issues."

"We've contacted technical support several times. They've been very good. They have been able to help us resolve our issues."

"The stability of the RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very good."

"The interface of this solution is very flexible and easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of RSA NetWitness Network is the single unified dashboard from which you can manage all the different products of RSA. Additionally, the integration with native applications is good."

"It is very easy to use, and its usability is great. The use cases are also very easy. The visualizations of the use cases are magnificent. You cannot find this in any other solution. From my point of view, it is great."

More NetWitness NDR pros

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

Cons

"The integration of the solution needs to be improved. The dashboard needs lots of updates as well. In the next release, we would like to see advanced fraud detection features."

"When analyzing something, you have to click several times. It requires a lot of effort to find something."

"Its price could be improved. It is an expensive product. Its training is also too expensive. It would be great if they can have a better pricing scheme for the training."

"RSA NetWitness Network could improve on integration with non-native application integration."

"The threat intelligence could improve in RSA NetWitness Endpoint."

"The solution lacks a reporting engine."

"I would like to see Security Orchestration and Response Automation (SOAR) integration."

"The contamination feature could be improved."

More NetWitness NDR cons

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution depends on the environment. If the environment is large then it will cost more. However, the larger the environment with more endpoints, you will receive an increased discount. If the environment is very small, then you might think it is expensive. It is always better to buy in bulk to receive a discount. The minimum number of assets is usually 500, with discounts on 1000 and 2000."

"It is an expensive product."

"The cost depends on the number of endpoints that you want to monitor, but it is not expensive."

"We are on a three-year contract to use RSA NetWitness Network."

"NetWitness Endpoint is less costly than its competitors, but it offers fewer features."

"They can easily adjust if you have the requirements which are required. If you have a budget cut or a budget constraint, they can bend."

"I do not have any opinion on the pricing or licensing of the product."

"With RSA, there is flexibility in choosing the service, products, and the range that meets your requirement, as well as they are flexible in terms of pricing."

More NetWitness NDR pricing and cost advice

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The price is comparable."

"The product has average pricing."

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The notifications and patch management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 10% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 6% of the time

Wazuh vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

More NetWitness NDR Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 17% of the time

Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR

December 2025

Download NetWitness NDR product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

RSA ECAT, NetWitness Network

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.

NetWitness

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Free Report: NetWitness NDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about NetWitness NDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetWitness NDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.