Netsurion vs Wipro Managed Security Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Netsurion
Ranking in Managed Security Services
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (14th), SOC as a Service (3rd), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (13th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (16th)
Wipro Managed Security Serv...
Ranking in Managed Security Services
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Managed Security Services category, the mindshare of Netsurion is 1.9%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wipro Managed Security Services is 1.9%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed Security Services
Unique Categories:
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
0.3%
SOC as a Service
2.3%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

JosephSnyder - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 23, 2023
Flexible with good incident response and helps with eliminating false positives
A SEIM is an SIEM. They all do the same thing. What's valuable about the Netsurion Managed XDR product is the analysis that it brings to the table. They do a really good job of filtering out; it generates a tremendous amount of data. They filter out what's needed and give me what I need to pay attention to. That's hard to do in a lot of the other products. The product provides us with a flexible solution that helps protect our entire IT environment. I only take advantage of it on the server side. I don't need it for my desktops, however, certainly, they offer that. Overall, it is quite flexible as evidenced by the fact that when it's first tuned, you get a large amount of data, and they're able to fine-tune that over time. To me, that's really important. We operate with their SOC. They are really nice guys. Great to work with. In terms of the SOC when it comes to alert monitoring and threat hunting, they do a great job. The fact that they're able to tune it for me over time and build a relationship is helpful. Some of those guys have been there for ten years. Is really important to us. They know what's valuable to us and what we want to see. We have the SOC provide a regular meeting. It's quarterly. We all get together, and I let my engineers do it over the phone. They'll let us know: "We're seeing this. This isn't important." They voluntarily call things to our attention and so on. It's a real value add working with them. The SOC is helpful for eliminating false positives. It filters out unneeded and unnecessary alerts and calls my attention to what's really important and what I need to pay attention to. Expediting incident response is really great. What's really nice is I haven't had to use it. So I don't have any examples. That said, they're really quick to respond. Again, that comes back to the SOC. They're there all the time. So they are looking at our stuff 24/7. We pay for that, yet it's a really valuable aspect of the service. Using the SOC affected our ability to focus on, for example, any other tasks. They've taken a whole bunch of work off my team and made it easier for them to do other important aspects of what we do every day in our bank. Monitoring helped to boost your SecOps productivity. It's decreasing the tedious SecOps management tasks. The time it's saved us per week is an FTE equivalent or more. That's easily 40 to 60 hours a week. It's saving my team. There's no doubt in my mind. It's probably more than that, however, I could confidently say it's 40 to 60 hours a week. The product has reduced the time to detection in my estimation. I haven't had any, however, it's clear to me that they would help. When we have had something that's been sort of fishy, they definitely chime in, and we get a notification from them almost immediately.
Use Wipro Managed Security Services?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You are paying for different levels, especially as far as the monitoring goes and how often you review it with the team. The other factor that figures in is how many nodes are on your network, such as clients, network equipment, servers, etc. There are some additional pieces on top of that, but it's laid out pretty simply, as far as how much you're going to pay for a node."
"In the security space, it's hard to quantify your return on investment. So, I don't. We spend about $40,000 a year and so. It's hard to say if the SIEM saved that much money."
"We put together the package of what we needed. It was based pretty much on the number of agents that we were deploying. If we needed to manage logging from certain specific applications, like Active Directory and SQL Server, there has been no additional cost for that. We had agents deployed for those specific servers and the applications were included, then there was just an additional installation that they had to do for us."
"Netsurion's pricing is extremely fair and flexible. The price of their SIEM product is reasonable, and you can pay for those services you want on top of that. It wasn't cheap, but it's competitive, and we intend to renew our contract."
"It is a bit expensive as compared to some of the other products that have come out in recent years. Expense-wise, the only downside is that it is not cheap."
"The upfront costs have increased, and we have been locked into this contract. The cost of changing over from it is way too high."
"I don't know if the pricing is by the seat but we're paying about $20,000 to 25,000 a year. On top of that, we pay for the managed support services. That runs us about another $35,000 or $40,000 a year."
"EventTracker's subscription-based model is interesting as far as yearly license type stuff. It's nice because you know what it's going to be next year. We haven't really looked at any other solutions. The pricing at the time compared to the other solutions was a lot less. A couple of years ago, we actually looked at Splunk. The amount in Splunk's licensing model is based on 20 gigs a day, or something like that. Based on our number of logs and stuff that we were already generating, the costs would be substantially more for the amount of logs that we would be getting."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Security Services solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
28%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsurion Managed Threat Protection?
Their pricing is high. I don't know if it's a barrier. The quality speaks to the price. The price is the price. They provide what they promise. From a purchasing perspective, I just have to come ba...
What needs improvement with Netsurion Managed Threat Protection?
There is one area that needs improvement and that is with the agents and the server that's on-site. The system requirements are very, very high. So I need a pretty powerful server to run. If they c...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Netsurion Managed Threat Protection, Netsurion EventTracker
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

The Salvation Army, The FRESH Market, Pacific Western Bank, NASA, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), and Talbot’s Stores
Northern Gas Networks
Find out what your peers are saying about Secureworks, Check Point Software Technologies, Ace Cloud Hosting and others in Managed Security Services. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.