NetApp SnapMirror vs Quest QoreStor comparison

NetApp and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Replication category. NetApp is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.1, while Quest Software is ranked #22. NetApp holds a 17.7% mindshare in DR, compared to Quest Software’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

NetApp SnapMirror

Read 25 NetApp SnapMirror reviews

2,096 Views
1,055 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quest QoreStor

Read 9 Quest QoreStor reviews

88 Views
23 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapMirror

Quest QoreStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

NetApp SnapMirror and Quest QoreStor are leading contenders in data management and protection. Based on user reviews, Quest QoreStor is preferred for its storage efficiency through deduplication and compression, while NetApp SnapMirror stands out for reliable data replication and ease of use in large-scale disaster recovery.

Features: NetApp SnapMirror excels with features like seamless data replication, block-level consistency, and bandwidth-efficient transfers. It integrates smoothly with various applications and provides valuable snapshot capabilities. Quest QoreStor shines with extreme deduplication, data compression, and its hardware platform flexibility, making it ideal for diverse backup and archiving requirements.

Room for Improvement: NetApp SnapMirror could improve performance and replication intervals and provide more direct support access. Its licensing structure could be streamlined. Quest QoreStor needs enhancements in ransomware protection and installation simplicity. Better monitoring tools and processes could also improve support effectiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp SnapMirror supports hybrid deployments and offers strong customer service, although there are regional variations in support quality. Quest QoreStor focuses on on-premises solutions and is commended for its effective customer service, with a responsive support team.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp SnapMirror's pricing is seen as higher due to additional licensing costs, yet it offers flexible options and strong ROI for reliable replication. Quest QoreStor provides competitive pricing models, especially for incremental capacity needs. Both products deliver good ROI when scaled to business demands, though SnapMirror's extra licensing fees are sometimes criticized.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp SnapMirror vs. Quest QoreStor Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror vs. Quest QoreStor

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp SnapMirror

Ranking in Data Replication

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quest QoreStor

Ranking in Data Replication

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (96th), Disk Based Backup Systems (7th), Storage Software (7th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (44th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (37th), Copy Data Management (9th), File and Object Storage (49th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of NetApp SnapMirror is 17.7%, down from 21.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest QoreStor is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

Provides great data loss recovery and real time replication

Deployment was very smooth and took around two weeks. Following that, we carried out our data migration which took time. We previously used a Windows file independent server with its own local disk and Windows OS. It's not compatible with NetApp so data had to be physically migrated. We also took extra time integrating with our antivirus software and configuring external tape libraries with NetApp. We had one staff member involved in the deployment and an engineer from our partners. We have close to 900 users. The solution requires routine tasks as opposed to maintenance. We have three or four people with access to this storage.

Read full review

Jeff Manuszak

CTO at EDSI

Cost-efficient, highly scalable, and installable on different types of hardware

They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved. We are pretty lenient as we do a lot of IT support ourselves. We are not very hard on support organizations, but when a customer has a support issue, it would be easier if the support processes were a little bit more automated. It would be beneficial to have an easier way to upload diagnostic dump files. They can make it easy for the customer to collect the diagnostic data. There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field. This is especially critical because it stores customers' backups, and a failure can have significant business impacts. If a customer does not have the backups and has a disaster, they can be out of business, so monitoring is key.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With SnapMirror, the solution is the feature itself that is most valuable. It just replicates the data. It's very difficult to speak about, in the sense that it's similar to the features of a wheel. It is round and it's a part of an automobile."

"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."

"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."

"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."

"Data protection is a valuable feature."

"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."

"NetApp SnapMirror stands out for its ease of management, efficiency, and scalability, which align well with our operational needs."

"The solution is very stable."

More NetApp SnapMirror pros

"Quest QoreStor is very stable compared to our previous solution."

"This software solution can be installed on many different types of hardware, which makes it very flexible. We can run it on virtual machines or virtual servers, providing convenience for solutions of varying sizes, from small to large."

"I would rate QoreStor a ten out of ten for what it offers for the price."

"We need revisions and safe backup so that it could be held up in court, but deduplication and compression are the main features why we have Quest QoreStor. That's where it really shines. I use ZFS and XFS at home, and Quest QoreStor is even better."

"Deduplication is the most valuable feature. It saves us a lot of space. When we back up 100 terabytes of data, after dedupe, it only uses maybe five to six terabytes for the disk space in QoreStor."

"It integrates with various backup software solutions, which makes it compatible with existing backup workflows and processes."

"The dedupe and compression are pretty extreme. On disk, we're getting dedupe rates of up to 65 percent of data and compression of 34 percent. When you go to the cloud, it's more like 76 percent for dedupe and almost 50 percent for compression."

"QoreStor has helped us to reduce our backup storage requirements on-premises. We've been using the same devices for quite a while, and so it lets us keep using them as opposed to having to rip out all that hardware and create a new on-prem solution. The advantage here is even if we had to retire the hardware tomorrow, the QoreStor part doesn't change. We just have to have additional hardware and put the solution back on whatever hardware we pick and it'll do the same thing."

More Quest QoreStor pros

Cons

"We have to do manual verifications about the subscriptions often."

"The tool should also work on third-party solutions."

"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."

"We have different families of storage, such as the E-Series and Flash systems, but NetApp cannot be set up between them."

"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."

"If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great."

"In the next release, I would like to get an active IP number solution."

"The GUI can be improved to perform complex tasks"

More NetApp SnapMirror cons

"The setup of the software is definitely not the easiest thing. I worked a lot with Quest engineers, especially in the early days when we were first testing it and trying it out. I actually had some of the developers working with us at one point because they were going through these point releases, and I was having trouble getting it to work in this S3-compatible situation. We got it all working eventually, but setup is definitely not the easiest thing in the world."

"There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field."

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial. After everything is set up and configured, there should be a way to export the configuration. In case something happens to the QoreStor server, and we need to reinstall and configure everything, being able to import the configuration would be helpful. This feature does not currently exist."

"Support is one point of improvement for Quest QoreStor. Support is sometimes not adequate."

"They need to increase their maximum capacity. Other than that, they're doing a pretty good job."

"The ransomware protection of QoreStor could use improvement."

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial."

"They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved."

More Quest QoreStor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is low compared to different vendors."

"The pricing could be improved."

"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."

"The product price is reasonable."

"The pricing can be improved."

"It's a highly cost-effective solution"

"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."

"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."

"Quest QoreStor's pricing is affordable. We evaluated Veeam, a well-known company for backup solutions, but found their pricing to be quite high. Veeam's price was almost double. For us, Quest QoreStor is very affordable."

"The pricing is good. It is competitive for a managed services provider. I like the ability to pay by the terabyte, allowing for an incremental cost that we and our customers can afford, so the solution grows with the customer."

"The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors."

"Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Performing Arts

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?

The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapMirror?

The product price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?

They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product.

See all answers

What else besides data replication does QoreStor offer?

Quest QoreStor can be used for multiple things besides data replication. For example, it can be trusted to make a backup of your data. You know that replication and backups are different, right? Re...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore protect your data?

One of our favorite features of Quest QoreStore for data protection isn't the backup, actually, though we're using it actively (maybe just as much as data replication, to be honest). We absolutely ...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore solve repetitive data replicas?

When I first found out about data replication and the many benefits it had, I couldn't help but wonder - what about the copies you don't need? Like it's unavoidable for some of the copies to get da...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Snapshot vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 86% of the time

Hitachi TrueCopy vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 8% of the time

Dell AppSync vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 5% of the time

More NetApp SnapMirror Competitors

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Quest QoreStor

Compared 100% of the time

More Quest QoreStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror

April 2025

Download NetApp SnapMirror product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest QoreStor

April 2025

Download Quest QoreStor product report

Also Known As

SnapMirror

QoreStor

Overview

NetApp SnapMirror technology provides fast, efficient data replication and disaster recovery (DR) for your critical data. Use a single solution across all NetApp storage arrays and protocols. SnapMirror technology works with any application, in both virtual and traditional environments, and in multiple configurations, including hybrid cloud.

NetApp

Quest QoreStor is commonly used for deduplication, compression, backup, and restore, integrated with NetVault for robust data redundancy and cloud storage replication.

Quest QoreStor optimizes data management with its sophisticated deduplication and compression capabilities, allowing companies to efficiently handle data redundancy. By integrating seamlessly with platforms like NetVault, Veeam, and resellers utilizing SPHiNX and BackBox, Quest QoreStor serves as both local and offsite repositories. This solution manages replication between production and corporate locations, strengthening recovery and improving backup operations. QoreStor's software-based nature ensures flexibility and easy integration, although improvements in replication and installation are sought by users.

What Are Key Features of Quest QoreStor?

Deduplication: Significantly reduces storage usage, achieving deduplication rates up to 76%.
Compression: Lowers data size on disk and cloud storage by up to 50%.
Integration: Compatible with multiple backup software to enhance efficiency.
Cloud Tiering: Facilitates seamless cloud storage expansion.
Encryption & Replication: Ensures secure and reliable data transportation and protection.

What ROI and Benefits Should Be Considered?

Storage Efficiency: Reduces required storage capacity savings on costs.
Backup Optimization: Increases speed and efficiency of backup processes.
Flexibility: Software-based, allowing adaptability to existing infrastructure.
Data Security: Offers strong encryption and replication features.

In sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology, Quest QoreStor aids in maintaining vital data management with its robust features, enhancing data recovery strategies. Its use with secondary backup targets and replication capabilities supports a wide range of industry requirements. However, challenges such as initial setup complexity and system interface improvements are areas for growth, particularly in expanding capacities and addressing specific cybersecurity concerns like ransomware protection on Linux.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College

American Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror vs. Quest QoreStor

April 2025

Free Report: NetApp SnapMirror vs. Quest QoreStor

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp SnapMirror vs. Quest QoreStor and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp SnapMirror vs. Quest QoreStor report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.