"Technical support has been very helpful when we have issues."
"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."
"I like this product because it is easy to use."
"Quorum OnQ has a good ransomware protection feature, and customer service and support were very good."
"From a disaster-recovery point of view, one of the things I really like is that I can test the virtual copy of the physical server on a test network and compare the servers side-by-side, without interfering with the production network. So I can see and make sure that the latest copy of the server is the physical copy of the server, without interfering with production."
"The most useful feature is the one-click recovery."
"A very high level security environment for secondary data."
"Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery."
"The change in the way that Quorum processes data has made a tremendous improvement in backup and replication times. While the familiar interface remains, the underpinnings have been finely tuned and the speed is incredible. My large Exchange Server went from 5- to 6-hour backups down to 22 minutes."
"The UI, the User Interface, needs to be improved. It's not as clean or modern as it could be."
"Lacks compatibility in terms of supporting other OS."
"Better integration with cloud-based solutions like Azure and Office 365 is needed."
"Quorum OnQ can be improved by providing support for other operating systems like Ubuntu."
"I would like to see iSCSI support added so that NAS storage servers could be protected. We heavily utilize NAS storage and the risk there is minimal backup options. Currently, we are backing up NAS to NAS which is costly and slow. Being able to integrate NAS server backup would be the last item on my Quorum bucket list."
"One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular."
"The price of Quorum OnQ could be improved. We were exploring the product in terms of having a partnership with the distributor so that we could operate as a service, but for our own use, within the company, we couldn't justify the price unless the servers would become an option later on. The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."
NetApp SnapCenter is ranked 43rd in Backup and Recovery Software with 1 review while Quorum OnQ is ranked 17th in Backup and Recovery Software with 8 reviews. NetApp SnapCenter is rated 8.0, while Quorum OnQ is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of NetApp SnapCenter writes "Free to use with good stability and very good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "Enables me to have a virtual version of a server up and running in minutes". NetApp SnapCenter is most compared with Cohesity DataProtect, Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault, Rubrik and Veritas NetBackup, whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault, Zerto, Rubrik and Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery Software vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
