

HPE Zerto Software and NAKIVO Backup & Replication are competing products in the disaster recovery and backup solutions market. NAKIVO Backup & Replication generally appears more appealing due to its comprehensive features and perceived value, even if HPE Zerto Software might be favored for pricing and customer support.
Features: HPE Zerto Software highlights continuous data protection and near-zero data loss with rapid recovery, as well as seamless integration with VMware and Hyper-V environments. Its real-time replication provides near-instantaneous failover capabilities. NAKIVO Backup & Replication stands out for its broad compatibility across platforms, efficient backup functionality, and features like instant backup verification and built-in deduplication and compression to optimize storage efficiency. Additionally, NAKIVO supports seamless backup to cloud services and easy recovery processes.
Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could enhance its deployment process to streamline initial setup and make it more user-friendly for organizations with limited IT resources. Better integration with cloud platforms and expanding its feature set beyond VMware environments would add value. NAKIVO Backup & Replication may improve by providing faster backup speeds and offering more advanced reporting options. Further development in user interface intuitiveness and more granular backup scheduling options would make it even more competitive. Ensuring robust support for physical server environments could address concerns about backup reliability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NAKIVO Backup & Replication is noted for its straightforward deployment process and strong customer support, offering quick setup and a user-friendly experience. The platform’s support team is recognized for prompt and effective assistance. HPE Zerto Software, although backed by reliable customer support, faces challenges in deployment due to its complex initial setup process, potentially requiring more technical expertise to implement efficiently.
Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software is typically more cost-effective, often achieving quicker ROI through its simplified pricing and competitive edge in rapid recovery. It provides strategic advantages to organizations looking for cost-efficient disaster recovery solutions. On the other hand, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, while possibly more expensive upfront, is praised for its long-term value delivered through comprehensive features and robust support, justifying the higher initial investment with improved data protection and operational efficiencies.
Before, it was a huge cost. It was several thousand dollars to do a DR test, whereas now, I click a button.
It saves us a lot of time and gives us the ability to perform other DR plans for other systems.
It's not only in the cloud; it's DR as a service, which means that the recovery operations are performed by a dedicated team specializing in this area.
I have seen a return on investment through money savings and time efficiency.
In terms of money, we have saved more, and because we are able to replicate everything from production to DR, we can now seamlessly work in any environment we want.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
When I open a ticket, I usually get a call within an hour or two.
They are equipped with newer technology, requiring less attention.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Customers need to follow good engineering practices for optimal product use.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
The ease of use was so good with Zerto that they were able to migrate things much quicker.
It is very reliable.
They are built with newer technology and processes, needing less support.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
If the host has a lot of VMs on it, there may not always be enough time to relocate all of the VMs from a protection group standpoint to other hosts before the replication appliance that Zerto uses to manage that powers itself down.
If HPE Zerto Software has it built-in where we're going to vCenter and you click on it, it will build the VPG and indicate configuration requirements, that would be amazing.
They had given a feature of real-time replication which they stopped in NAKIVO.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
Zerto is easier to set up and use, and it's less expensive.
The product is affordable even for smaller organizations.
The pricing is very low, and the licensing process makes it easy to obtain any quote.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
The VM, restore, and file recovery capabilities are considered gold standards.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE Zerto Software | 2.1% |
| NAKIVO Backup & Replication | 1.1% |
| Other | 96.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 92 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 86 |
| Large Enterprise | 194 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 80 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.
What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.