

HPE Zerto Software and NAKIVO Backup & Replication both compete in the data protection solutions category. HPE Zerto Software shines with its real-time replication and disaster recovery capabilities, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication excels in providing a comprehensive backup suite, balancing functionality with cost considerations, although with slightly elevated prices.
Features: HPE Zerto Software supports near-synchronous replication, allowing for rapid recovery objectives and ensuring minimal data loss. It efficiently orchestrates disaster recovery processes through automated workflows, seamlessly integrating with hybrid cloud environments. Another key feature is real-time monitoring for threats, enabling proactive data protection. NAKIVO Backup & Replication stands out with file-level and VM-level backups, boosting flexibility and data recovery options. The product supports diverse environments, such as VMware, Hyper-V, and Proxmox, offering efficient deduplication and compression. It provides ransomware protection through encrypted backups, securing the integrity of saved data.
Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software's deployment complexity might benefit from streamlining to reduce setup efforts and enhance user experience. Its scope for real-time backup operations can expand further as it's vital for users with critical data needs. Another improvement might be in documentation to ensure quick troubleshooting. NAKIVO Backup & Replication could enhance integration speed with Office 365 and increase backup handling efficiency. Another area to improve is reducing the burden on NAS devices, which could be achieved by optimizing its resource usage. It might also leverage AI for smart backup automation, enhancing operational support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NAKIVO Backup & Replication is favored for its simple deployment, making it an ideal candidate for organizations with limited IT infrastructure and comes with robust customer support. Conversely, HPE Zerto Software, while highly capable, often requires a more in-depth setup process due to its advanced features, demanding significant initial effort and engagement with HPE's comprehensive technical resources.
Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software tends to incur a higher initial setup cost, which is justified with its sophisticated disaster recovery capabilities designed for businesses needing continuous data protection, potentially yielding medium to long-term gains. NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers a cost-effective pricing model, often resulting in a quicker ROI, cherry-picked by businesses seeking to optimize traditional backup and recovery expenses alongside comprehensive feature utilization.
Before, it was a huge cost. It was several thousand dollars to do a DR test, whereas now, I click a button.
It saves us a lot of time and gives us the ability to perform other DR plans for other systems.
It's not only in the cloud; it's DR as a service, which means that the recovery operations are performed by a dedicated team specializing in this area.
I have seen a return on investment through money savings and time efficiency.
In terms of money, we have saved more, and because we are able to replicate everything from production to DR, we can now seamlessly work in any environment we want.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
When I open a ticket, I usually get a call within an hour or two.
They are equipped with newer technology, requiring less attention.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Customers need to follow good engineering practices for optimal product use.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
The ease of use was so good with Zerto that they were able to migrate things much quicker.
It is very reliable.
They are built with newer technology and processes, needing less support.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
If the host has a lot of VMs on it, there may not always be enough time to relocate all of the VMs from a protection group standpoint to other hosts before the replication appliance that Zerto uses to manage that powers itself down.
If HPE Zerto Software has it built-in where we're going to vCenter and you click on it, it will build the VPG and indicate configuration requirements, that would be amazing.
They had given a feature of real-time replication which they stopped in NAKIVO.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
Zerto is easier to set up and use, and it's less expensive.
The product is affordable even for smaller organizations.
The pricing is very low, and the licensing process makes it easy to obtain any quote.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
The VM, restore, and file recovery capabilities are considered gold standards.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE Zerto Software | 2.0% |
| NAKIVO Backup & Replication | 1.2% |
| Other | 96.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 90 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 92 |
| Large Enterprise | 195 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 81 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.
What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.