Nagios Core vs ScienceLogic comparison

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

3,857 Views
2,044 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and Nagios Core are competitors in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management space. ScienceLogic appears to have an upper hand with its extensive features and robust support, while Nagios Core stands out for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility.

Features: ScienceLogic offers dynamic apps, multi-tenancy support, and highly customizable features, enabling comprehensive infrastructure monitoring, advanced event management, and improved predictive analytics. Nagios Core presents a flexible and reliable system with customizable monitoring capabilities but primarily relies on community-driven plugins for additional features.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users point out the complexity in its interface, reporting limitations, and issues with integrating external platforms, alongside a demand for better automation and synthetic transaction monitoring. Nagios Core users face a steep learning curve during configuration, limited graphical interfaces, and basic reporting functions, calling for improvements in error reporting and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud deployments, providing excellent customer and technical support recognized for its responsiveness and expertise. Nagios Core, mainly used on-premises, is valued for its open-source nature, although it lacks formal support, depending on community resources for help.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is perceived as expensive, operating on a tiered pricing model based on device numbers. Its robust features often justify its cost for enterprises looking for long-term ROI. Nagios Core, being open-source, incurs no licensing costs, offering a cost-effective option for those with the skills for self-management and customization.

To learn more, read our detailed Nagios Core vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: September 2025).

Nagios Core vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

8.8

Nagios Core reduces downtime and costs with quick alerts, providing full ROI and eliminating expensive monitoring tools.

Sentiment score

7.0

ScienceLogic enhances efficiency, visibility, and reduces incidents, providing long-term ROI and improved company image and operations.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.1

Nagios Core relies on community support, praised for stability and resources, but lacks official help compared to Nagios XI.

Sentiment score

7.8

ScienceLogic's support is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and proactive problem-solving, often deemed industry-leading by users.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.7

Nagios Core shows scalability for large networks but may need customizations and integrations for distributed environments.

Sentiment score

6.7

ScienceLogic excels in scalability and adaptability, supporting large deployments, though minor challenges exist in hardware and user onboarding.

The solution is scalable.

Husham Yaqoob

Senior System Administrator at Interactive Group

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

Nagios Core is highly stable and reliable with minimal footprint, supporting extensive monitoring without network burden.

Sentiment score

7.0

ScienceLogic is reliable and stable, with strong support, handling large volumes efficiently despite minor bugs during upgrades.

I tried many other solutions at work, however, in terms of Nagios, I haven't seen any disruption or downtime.

Husham Yaqoob

Senior System Administrator at Interactive Group

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Room For Improvement

Nagios Core needs a more intuitive interface, better scalability, and features like enhanced reporting and integration with modern tools.

ScienceLogic struggles with complexity, requiring UI simplification, integration improvements, better support, and enhanced monitoring and automation features.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.

Toshi Longkumer

Solution Architect at Tata Consultancy

Setup Cost

Nagios Core is a free, cost-effective open-source tool, but requires Linux expertise and incurs hosting and maintenance costs.

ScienceLogic offers flexible but potentially costly pricing, emphasizing understanding business needs to justify its robust capabilities.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

It could be cheaper.

Toshi Longkumer

Solution Architect at Tata Consultancy

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Valuable Features

Nagios Core provides flexible, low-resource monitoring with customization, automation, efficient alerts, and integration support for reliable IT performance visibility.

ScienceLogic delivers versatile IT management with robust monitoring, automation, and integration, ensuring efficient operations across diverse infrastructures.

It has a very handy dashboard, providing live alerts and visibility for everything.

Husham Yaqoob

Senior System Administrator at Interactive Group

For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report

Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.

Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.

For more quotes and insights, download the ScienceLogic report

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.

Toshi Longkumer

Solution Architect at Tata Consultancy

Categories and Ranking

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

12th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

26th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.1%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nagios Core	3.1%
ScienceLogic	1.7%
Other	95.2%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

More Nagios Core Competitors

Comparisons

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 21% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 12% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmk vs Nagios Core

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Nagios Core

Download Nagios Core product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Nagios Core vs. ScienceLogic