N-able EDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360 comparison

N-able and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #53 with an average rating of 7.0, while WatchGuard is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 3 N-able EDR reviews

686 Views
256 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Read 28 Panda Adaptive Defense 360 reviews

2,498 Views
502 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and N-able EDR compete in the endpoint protection space. Panda holds the upper hand due to its more favorable pricing and support feedback, although N-able EDR's feature set might justify its higher price.

Features: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers robust threat detection and response capabilities, automated anomaly detection, and seamless integration with other security tools. N-able EDR provides real-time monitoring, streamlined management, and comprehensive reporting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 could improve its performance speed, reduce system resource consumption, and refine analytics. N-able EDR users suggest enhancements in detailed threat analytics, broader integration options, and refined analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is noted for its intuitive setup process and responsive customer service. N-able EDR's guided setup instructions and helpful support team receive good reviews. Panda has quicker deployment, while N-able offers detailed guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is considered cost-effective, providing a high return on investment. N-able EDR, while more expensive, justifies its price with enhanced management tools and user satisfaction. Panda's ROI is strong, but some believe N-able's advanced features are worth the additional cost.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

53rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"It's very easy to deploy, we don't have any problem or issues. It's most full automatic. It basically takes the assumption that everything is supposed to be a suspect; files, processes, URL accesses, and so on."

"The most valuable features of Panda Security Adaptive Defense are the useful hardware information it provides, light on resources, controllable from the console, remote scan functionality, and the blocking of a lot of URL malware."

"The protection from malware is the most important feature. It has some endpoint information about the vehicle of the virus, malware, etc. It is also stable and easy to install, and they also provide good technical support."

"The most valuable feature is the web filter application control."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."

"Panda Security solution has a feature to block any unknown process and that is what is best about it."

"I would give the overall solution a rating of ten out of ten."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pros

Cons

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"I'd like to integrate it into my main services."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense can improve by including the intrusion and prevention system not only on their most expensive platform. Additionally, it blocks software that is legitimate from users. They complain and then we have to manually unblock the software, by hash, or we receive a message. Some of the prevention features are not available and this might cause us to need a separate firewall or something to protect the company."

"Improvements could be made in terms of how the reporting is structured."

"t would help if it would monitor the network better."

"The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard."

"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."

"Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."

"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"Panda is cloud-only and comes at a reasonable cost. It is a set price per seat."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Hospitality Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.

See all answers

What do you like most about Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

Although it is not a cheap solution, it is satisfying and functional. It is worth the money and provides good return on investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panda Security Adaptive Defense?

The software has performance issues due to its requirements on the processor, however, these issues are common with other vendors, not just WatchGuard.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 37% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 26% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR

Compared 9% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 23% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Compared 6% of the time

More Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

May 2025

Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?

Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

Advanced Security to Stop Breaches
Unified Endpoint Protection (EPP) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) capabilities, with our unique Zero-Trust Application Service and Threat Hunting Service in one single solution, to effectively detect and classify 100% of processes running on all the endpoints within your organization.

Cloud-delivered endpoint prevention, detection, containment and response technologies against advanced threat, zero-day malware, ransomware, phishing, in-memory exploits and malware-less attacks. It also provides IDS, firewall, device control, email protection, URL & content filtering capabilities.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

June 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.