Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Monte Carlo vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Monte Carlo
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (27th), Data Observability (1st)
Splunk Observability Cloud
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (6th), Network Monitoring Software (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Container Management (5th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Monte Carlo and Splunk Observability Cloud aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Monte Carlo is designed for Data Observability and holds a mindshare of 27.6%, down 34.2% compared to last year.
Splunk Observability Cloud, on the other hand, focuses on Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability, holds 2.4% mindshare, up 1.6% since last year.
Data Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Monte Carlo27.6%
Unravel Data16.1%
Acceldata12.7%
Other43.599999999999994%
Data Observability
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Splunk Observability Cloud2.4%
Dynatrace6.0%
Datadog5.2%
Other86.4%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

PR
Associate Sr. Manager at Financial Insight Technology, Inc.
Provides centralized data observability features and has an easy-to-use user interface.
The product's initial setup is in a daily improvement stage, deploying new plugins for upstream and downstream resources. It takes 25 minutes to complete. The process involves integrating with third-party services for Single Sign-On (SSO). It requires only one executive for maintenance as it has easy-to-use navigation and user interface.
Taiwo Ige - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Operations Engineer at ABC Supply Co. Inc.
Alerting improves incident response across teams and enables faster awareness before customer impact
Splunk Observability Cloud could be improved in terms of integrations with more technical add-ons, such as Zoom. Although they have one with Zoom, it's not available in the cloud, so having that feature would be beneficial. Essentially, Splunk should continue expanding to create easier ways to ingest logs from different products. The out-of-the-box customizable dashboards in Splunk Observability Cloud are very effective in showcasing IT performance to business leaders. However, there are aspects that could be improved, such as linking dashboards to one another. While IT leaders may not drill down, it's crucial to create levels of dashboards for technical users to find root causes, making it effective for stakeholders.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It makes organizing work easier based on its relevance to specific projects and teams."
"It can monitor, get the data, and then report on the data."
"It supports proactive management, enhances security, and improves operational efficiency."
"Dashboards help the application support teams to have a quick look at how their systems are running. It helps other teams as well."
"It is a good tool. It allows you to set alerts for application and infrastructure monitoring, and it allows you to create dashboards."
"We haven't really experienced any glitches or bugs."
"Great monitoring of network devices."
"Splunk Observability Cloud is effective for detecting anomalies and preventing system outages."
"The vibrant dashboards are valuable."
 

Cons

"For anomaly detection, the product provides only the last three weeks of data, while some competitors can analyze a more extended data history."
"The cardinality is pretty low."
"Particularly what we're having is disconnection from the cloud console, where we will be working in it and receive a message saying that we've been disconnected and have to wait for it to come up."
"Splunk Observability Cloud could be improved in terms of integrations with more technical add-ons, such as Zoom."
"The monitoring of workloads when using SignalFx could be improved."
"The solution's stability is an area that has room for improvement. It needs to provide constant stability to its users."
"There is not a lot of support for the tool's on-premises version, especially since everything is on the cloud."
"When we have too many detectors in place for one particular app, such as when I have created 50+ detectors through my account, the entire page becomes a bit loaded when creating the 51st detector, feeling heavy and taking time to load."
"Splunk Observability Cloud could be improved by having more integration with Splunk Cloud because at the moment they're two separate products. They're making great moves on what they call unified access; tighter integration is always a good thing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has moderate pricing."
"It is expensive."
"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."
"The solution's pricing is costly."
"The product is a bit expensive considering the competition but the company may negotiate the price."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive."
"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."
"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Observability solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise53
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Monte Carlo?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is commensurate with the enterprise-grade observability. While initial setup, particularly tuning the monitors, demands ...
What needs improvement with Monte Carlo?
Some improvements I see for Monte Carlo include alert tuning and noise reduction, as other data quality tools offer that. While its anomaly detection is powerful, it sometimes generates alerts that...
What is your primary use case for Monte Carlo?
Our main use case for Monte Carlo is in the energy sector where it has been central to helping us ensure we have trusted and reliable data across our critical operational and business data pipeline...
What do you like most about SignalFx?
The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.
What needs improvement with SignalFx?
Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...
What is your primary use case for SignalFx?
The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara