"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"The solution is scalable and we have plans to increase usage in the future."
"This solution has cut down on our development time and allows us to spin off new instances for inner development, testing, productions, and security testing."
"If we compare legacy application support to Docker, it's a superior product."
"DLP, Data Loss Prevention, and the complexity of how we manage the console and how this client, or this tool, will notify us when there is something going wrong within the server and endpoint, is good."
"Some of the main features of this solution are it is reliable and can be used in small to large size businesses."
"This product offers good protection against many types of malware."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a firewall-based solution. We just open the required reports to the server—to server communication—and that's how we use Deep Security."
"It's easy to use and the interface is simple."
"Deep Security is a good product for managing a few servers."
"The solution is quite secure."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the virtual path function, which is the reason we chose to implement it."
"Areas for improvement are the privacy of container management and the documentation. In the next release, I would like to see best practices on how to manage distributed containers and networks."
"Integration with Windows is something that can be improved."
"This solution is open-source and they need to focus on improving the Linux Operating Systems' GUI. It does not have a GUI making it not user-friendly. Additionally, the containers need to improve security and compliance."
"This product will only be useful if it can successfully run legacy applications in the cloud."
"Deep Security's reporting functionality could be improved."
"The risk is very complex. We need our tools to be more intelligent, more automated, more detectable."
"There should be more tools to trace back. Some sort of module needs to be included to attach all the things. It should be more stable, and the traceback feature should be improved. There were cases when we got virtual analyzer or CMC errors. We got false-positive malware notifications, but we couldn't trace them. I raised a case with Trend Micro two or three times, but they couldn't resolve it. Their support should be improved in terms of technical abilities to troubleshoot complex issues. They should be more knowledgeable."
"The problem with this solution is that if you go on large sites you have to have an external database, which would increase the cost."
"Post-implementation is time-consuming. You have to do monitoring, and that takes time. After you set up everything, it's not a full-fledged implementation. You have to keep on monitoring and configuring."
"The product isn't very user-friendly."
"The cost is very high."
"They need to build in a central console because central integration is not very good right now."
Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 1st in Container Virtualization with 4 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 18 reviews. Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 9.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "Reliable, scalable, and easy installation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Each and every IP connecting to the server gets scanned so we can block whichever IPs do not belong to us at the firewall". Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with Flockport, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Canonical LXD, BMC Helix Cloud Security and CoreOS Rocket, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Symantec End-User Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Carbon Black CB Defense. See our Mirantis Container Cloud vs. Trend Micro Deep Security report.
We monitor all Container Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
