We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Teamwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A single place for all our organisation's project records."
"I found the portfolio management valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good."
"The solution is stable."
"Microsoft Project Server is simple to use."
"The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to understand and navigate."
"The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning."
"The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."
"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports."
"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy."
"There are certain shortcomings in the documentation part where improvements are required."
"Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature. It can look at the plan and identify risks early on from any part of your project."
"When we started using this solution from scratch, we got lost. Microsoft should provide some templates for configurations for certain use cases."
"There need to be more tutorials available to users."
"It appears that Microsoft's primary goal is to migrate as much functionality as possible from the legacy on-premises Microsoft Project Server to the new cloud-based Power Apps solution."
"Collaboration within the tool is lacking when you compare it to online or cloud-based tools."
"It has to be more user-friendly. For instance, there should be some assistance, like when you go to certain sites, people pop up and say, "Can we help you? What are you looking for?" It's not interactive enough."
"This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them."
"The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution."
"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."
"The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar."
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 5th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Teamwork is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Teamwork is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork writes "A flexible, stable, and scalable tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Teamwork is most compared with Smartsheet, Jira, monday.com and OpenText Project and portfolio Management. See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Teamwork report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
