Ataccama ONE Platform vs SAP Master Data Governance comparison

Ataccama and SAP are both solutions in the Master Data Management (MDM) Software category. Ataccama is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Ataccama holds a 4.5% mindshare in MDM, compared to SAP’s 20.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 10 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

2,557 Views
179 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Master Data Governance

Read 29 SAP Master Data Governance reviews

2,311 Views
1,156 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

SAP Master Data Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2025

SAP Master Data Governance and Ataccama ONE Platform compete in the master data management domain. Ataccama ONE Platform appears to have an edge in data quality and profiling with superior AI capabilities and a flexible pricing model.

Features: SAP Master Data Governance excels in ERP integration, offering flexibility and customization for master data management. Users find it useful for consolidating duplicate records and standardizing workflows. Ataccama ONE Platform stands out in data quality management with advanced AI and machine learning, offering seamless integration and an intuitive user interface.

Room for Improvement: SAP Master Data Governance could enhance mass editing features, better ERP alignment, and simplify its configuration process. Meanwhile, Ataccama ONE Platform needs to improve handling of large datasets, expand its integration capabilities, and enhance configurations for unstructured data.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Master Data Governance provides hybrid and cloud deployment options but is noted for its complexity. SAP's technical support is satisfactory but occasionally slow. Ataccama ONE Platform offers easier on-premises deployment with generally responsive support; however, its documentation could be improved.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Master Data Governance is considered expensive, with costs justified by improved fraud reduction and data management. Ataccama ONE Platform provides a competitive pricing model, often free to start, appealing to those seeking data security without high initial costs, with both showing strong ROI through data accuracy and customer service improvement.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Master Data Governance Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Master Data Governance

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Master Data Management (MDM) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (4th), Data Scrubbing Software (3rd), Data Governance (11th)

SAP Master Data Governance

Ranking in Master Data Management (MDM) Software

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Master Data Management (MDM) Software category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 4.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Master Data Governance is 20.4%, down from 22.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Master Data Management (MDM) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Master Data Governance	20.4%
Ataccama ONE Platform	4.5%
Other	75.1%

Master Data Management (MDM) Software

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

UdayReddy

Lead at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Detailed technical support and data integration capabilities create seamless user experience

Regarding SAP Master Data Governance, there is significant room for improvement particularly concerning the replication types. For example, when a vendor master is created in Ariba and a request is submitted from the Ariba system, SAP Ariba directs it to MDG. MDG verifies the details entirely through PI/PO or CPI. Once MDG verifies the data, the request is submitted to the S/4HANA system, the target. After a final approval at all levels, the vendor number is generated, and the vendor code gets passed from source to target system. This number is available in both the Ariba integration in the systems and in SAP BPT code, as well as the S/4HANA system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is also easy to deploy."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"Pricing for SAP Master Data Governance in the latest scenario depends on each version, offering a robust and user-friendly application."

"The product is easy to use and is beneficial from a data governance perspective."

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of SAP Master Data Governance is very easy."

"SAP Master Data Governance integrates well."

"The main purpose of SAP Master Data Governance is maintaining a single source of truth for enterprise data, and it helps a lot and works quite well."

"I like how the solution integrates with other SAP tools and third-party solutions."

"The scalability is very good."

"SAP Master Data Governance is a customizable solution and is flexible."

More SAP Master Data Governance pros

Cons

"Data movement is a pain."

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"The user interface is not user-friendly."

"The technical support should be improved."

"Bill of materials (BOM) creation in manufacturing needs to be enhanced in SAP Master Data Governance."

"There is no clarity and direction on how to manage bills of materials (BOMs) or routing in MDG."

"Overall, they just a little bit more flexibility in terms of assigning roles or adding new roles. We have a longer approval process, so we need to break it down into more roles than what is typically available and we need to hard-code it."

"The profiling feature, especially for materials, needs improvement. We faced challenges maintaining specific details for a single material from multiple vendors."

"The platform's pricing needs improvement."

"The product is not user-friendly."

More SAP Master Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware there are no additional costs."

"The solution is costly."

"SAP Master Data Governance is a licensed product. While there might be no upfront cost for the MDG component itself, you still need to pay for user authorizations."

"I rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The cost of the product is not ideal."

"The product is too expensive."

"The pricing is a bit too high."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

More SAP Master Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Master Data Governance?

We've managed tens of thousands of updates within 30 to 60 minutes, and we can also replicate these changes to all connected systems.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Master Data Governance?

The challenge with SAP MDG is not only the cost but the resources. The skills required are niche in the market, and while you can purchase the product either one time or on a subscription basis, th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Master Data Governance?

I don't see any disadvantages or areas for improvement that I can think of, to be honest. It's sometimes challenging when you have to develop custom fields, but then usually it works, even when dep...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Atlan vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Master Data Governance

Compared 22% of the time

Syniti Master Data Management vs SAP Master Data Governance

Compared 13% of the time

TIBCO EBX vs SAP Master Data Governance

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft MDS vs SAP Master Data Governance

Compared 9% of the time

Semarchy xDM vs SAP Master Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Master Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

September 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Master Data Governance

September 2025

Download SAP Master Data Governance product report

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer

SAP MDG

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.

Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?

Data Profiling and Cleansing: Enhances data quality with easy configuration.
Flexible Integration: Seamless integration with platforms like Collibra.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Provides ease in workflow management.
Support for AI and Machine Learning: Offers advanced analytical capabilities.
Data Security: Ensures protection with profiling and masking features.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Data Quality: Enhances data accuracy and reliability.
Enhanced Governance: Facilitates better metadata classification and compliance.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data integration and transformation processes.
Advanced Analytics: Leverages AI for insightful data analysis.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.

Ataccama

Your company wants accurate, complete, and trusted data to master your digital business processes and business models. The SAP® Master Data Governance application provides ready-to-run, domain-specific master data governance, enabling you to decentrally own and consolidate and to centrally create, change, and distribute master data across your enterprise system landscape. Tight integration with other SAP solutions supports the reuse of data models, business logic, and validation frameworks with open integration to third-party products and services to support your entire technology stack. It supports cleansing, standardization, duplicate detection, and best-record calculation. It then lets you synchronize clean and standardized data across cloud and on-premise applications.

SAP

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Master Data Governance

September 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Master Data Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Master Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Master Data Governance report.

See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.

We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.