IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Viewpoint ERP

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs Viewpoint ERP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

    • More Microsoft Dynamics GP Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    610,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    21st
    out of 55 in ERP
    Views
    794
    Comparisons
    596
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    795
    Rating
    6.0
    29th
    out of 55 in ERP
    Views
    563
    Comparisons
    482
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP
    Learn More
    Microsoft
    Viewpoint
    Overview

    Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

    Vista by Viewpoint enables construction contractors to manage all areas of operations. It is fully integrated, scalable, and configurable. Featuring solutions for Accounting/HR, Project Management, Project Collaboration, Mobile, Estimating, Content Management and Service Management, Vista scales easily, integrates with many third-party software products and provides timely reporting of critical data.
    Offer
    Learn more about Microsoft Dynamics GP
    Learn More
    Learn more about Viewpoint ERP
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall
    W.L. Gary, Wanzek Construction, EnviroCon, Forbes Bros. Powerline Construction, RLS Construction, Hudson Mechanical
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Construction Company19%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    ERP
    June 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP. Updated: June 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    610,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked 21st in ERP with 3 reviews while Viewpoint ERP is ranked 29th in ERP. Microsoft Dynamics GP is rated 6.0, while Viewpoint ERP is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics GP writes "Robust system with a good integration manager but needs better budgeting features". On the other hand, Microsoft Dynamics GP is most compared with SAP S4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, Microsoft Dynamics AX, PeopleSoft and Deltek CostPoint, whereas Viewpoint ERP is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle ERP Cloud, Deltek CostPoint, NetSuite ERP and CMiC ERP.

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.