No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Tyk comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management
Ranking in API Management
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tyk
Ranking in API Management
11th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 10.3%, down from 16.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tyk is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure API Management10.3%
Tyk1.8%
Other87.9%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

RJ
Database Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Facilitating seamless integration and robust security support
The integration process is very easy, which is crucial for our organization. Another valuable aspect is the support from Microsoft. Whenever support is required, it is readily available. Additionally, I appreciate the technical expertise Microsoft brings to the table. The security features are highly satisfactory, with various options providing flexibility to implement security measures based on specific compliance requirements.
SaurabhKumar10 - PeerSpot reviewer
platform engineer, DevOps engineer at Capgemini
Secure banking APIs have protected sensitive transactions and support daily compliance monitoring
Tyk offers many valuable features. For the API, the best features include API security such as API key authentication, JWT tokens, barriers, and OIDC. There is rate limiting and throttling to control how many requests a user can make at one time, such as 100 requests per minute or 1000 requests per minute. API gateway routing and load balancing are handled very smoothly, and API analytics and monitoring are comprehensive. Request-response transformations allow us to track customer ID and monitor how many requests can go to the API versioning. Tyk gives Kubernetes and cloud-native support, including Kubernetes, Docker, and AWS, depending on the cloud-native and cloud-based platform. Logging and troubleshooting capabilities are among the best features. In terms of product benefits, Tyk secures the credit card API, protects the payment API, monitors transactions, handles traffic spikes, reduces downtime, troubleshoots with failover, and improves application reliability. Tyk has positively impacted my organization as it is not just an API gateway but has become a critical business platform that helps organizations securely expose, manage, monitor, and scale their APIs in the modern banking domain, fintech, and commercial insurance environments in cloud-native settings. Almost every application communicates through APIs, and Tyk ensures that the API remains secure, scalable, and has high availability.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Microsoft Azure API Management as a complete package contains all the features that meet our requirements."
"The most valuable features are the API and integrations."
"It is a simple and effective way to enable micro-services architecture."
"The solution can scale and is easy to expand; it’s actually quite impressive."
"The user management is pretty seamless."
"It's a very robust tool. So you see that there is a developer portal which can be used by developer or the vendors as well. And other external partners to create keys and manage their own APIs. The other thing is that they have a lot of policies there are too many options within API. So I do the difficult to tell one, but probably I would say, like, proxy sorry. The policies is one of the thing wherein you can just configure the policies and modify the behavior of the APIs."
"I have found this solution to be easy to configure, simple to use, and flexible."
"The integration with Azure Active Directory is a good security feature for authentication and authorization. There is multifactor authentication. You can also use all of the Azure AD features integrated with API Management."
"Other than the limitations with the cloud version everything else is fantastic."
"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality."
"Tyk looked like a good product."
"You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic."
"Tyk has had a positive impact on my organization by saving time through the reduction of manual tasks and monitoring of API flows."
"The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good."
"The transition was smooth overall, and the platform proved flexible from the start. As an open‑source product, TYK exceeded expectations when we initiated the migration and selected it as our API gateway. The UI is intuitive for common API gateway tasks and day‑to‑day operations; the core functionality is solid for standard use cases, and the system is flexible enough to support custom plugins and complex middleware chains once properly configured."
"Tyk is not just an API gateway but has become a critical business platform that helps organizations securely expose, manage, monitor, and scale their APIs in the modern banking domain, fintech, and commercial insurance environments in cloud-native settings."
 

Cons

"I would like to see more security features become available."
"Expansion to global regions is a point for improvement, as licensing is costly."
"There's some area for improvement for this solution's performance. Sometimes it can be challenging."
"One of the most important improvements for us would be if it supported the HTTP/3 version and new protocol over a quick connection."
"I could that the UI could be improved."
"An area for improvement in Microsoft Azure API Management is deployment, in particular, the deployment of versions in Oryx. The development to production instance isn't adequate for me and needs to be improved. Microsoft Azure API Management lacks automation, which is another area for improvement."
"The licensing tiers can be misleading."
"Performance issues from this platform need to be sorted out."
"In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them."
"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language."
"Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable."
"Given the complexity of the solution, comprehensive documentation was essential. I had to invest considerable time locating and understanding the relevant materials, especially since the supplier’s support was limited. Eventually, had to research with external sources and guidance from other users in my network. The UI handles common tasks well and feels intuitive for day‑to‑day operations. However, some advanced configuration options, particularly custom plugins, complex middleware chains, and multi‑region controls, seem to be scattered across different sections. This sometimes makes advanced setups slower and more cumbersome than they need to be. While the product is generally intuitive, advanced configurations can be non-trivial and require significant effort and external knowledge to implement correctly."
"There are some architectural bottlenecks, including operational complexity and multi-component overhead."
"Compared to Apigee or Kong, I find they excel beyond Tyk, which is the reason for my score."
"There are many features in Tyk, but a few things need to be improved from the developer side."
"It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"The solution appears cheaper because it's a cloud SaaS model."
"Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions."
"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure API Management is publicly available and goes from a developer edition that costs $26 to $30 per month. It may have changed, but it's in the neighborhood of $30 per month. I believe there's also the enterprise edition, which is highly capable and costs $2,500 per month."
"I would describe the tool's price as being in the mid-range category."
"Because of our partner relationship, our pricing is pretty decent. But in general, if I compare pricing, I think the initial offer that we got from Microsoft until the relationship kicked in was more expensive than AWS. There were some unexpected expenses because we had to pause. This was due to our inexperience and because we were doing this significant public cloud migration for the first time. We were using SAP on a public cloud for the first time."
"Microsoft Azure is an expensive solution not for the large enterprises but for the medium and small."
"Azure's pricing is very competitive compared to platforms like Apigee and MuleSoft."
"It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."
"The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."
"We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."
"There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."
"The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise54
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?
Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...
Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?
If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure API Management?
The pricing is medium, which I find to be reasonable for the value we receive.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tyk?
My experience regarding pricing, installation costs, and license management for this tool is that it is slightly expensive for support that is not present enough and difficult to contact.
What needs improvement with Tyk?
In my opinion, Tyk could be improved by providing the ability to see the different organizations on the dashboard at a single glance. I would also like to see the name of the organization I am conn...
What is your primary use case for Tyk?
My main use case for Tyk is API monitoring and API Gateway. A concrete example of how I use this tool for API monitoring or as an API gateway in my daily environment is the integration of API speci...
 

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas
Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Tyk and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.