Layer7 API Management vs Tyk comparison

Read 7 Tyk reviews

1,980 Views
1,980 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Layer7 API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Layer7 API Management and Tyk are strong competitors in the API management sector. Based on features, deployment, and pricing, Tyk appears to have the upper hand in flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while Layer7 excels in enterprise integration and support.

Features:Layer7 API Management is noted for its security protocols, enterprise-grade integration, and robust gateway functions. Tyk is praised for its open-source licensing, lightweight architecture, and rapid deployment capabilities.

Room for Improvement:Layer7 could enhance its user interface and reduce complexity in integrations. It might also benefit from a more competitive pricing model. Tyk might improve by enhancing its enterprise support options and expanding feature sets beyond the open-source framework. Additionally, Tyk has room to increase cloud support options for broader adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Layer7 offers a structured deployment model fit for complex enterprise environments, providing formalized support. Tyk supports multiple deployment options, including cloud-native, with community-driven support that is more agile and responsive.

Pricing and ROI:Layer7 involves substantial upfront costs due to its extensive enterprise features, which can result in a longer ROI. Tyk, with its open-source core and optional premium add-ons, usually has a lower initial cost and quicker ROI, appealing more to startups and mid-sized companies.

To learn more, read our detailed Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk Report (Updated: February 2026).

Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,160 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Layer7 API Management

Ranking in API Management

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tyk

Ranking in API Management

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Layer7 API Management is 2.2%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tyk is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Layer7 API Management	2.2%
Tyk	2.0%
Other	95.8%

API Management

Featured Reviews

C Vvanigalla

Works

Integration capabilities excel and support for varied platforms enhances communication across backend systems

We mainly use REST APIs, and the solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It allows communication with a number of back-end providers and data consolidation. The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable. Code changes and migration are straightforward, and it supports identity and access management integration.

Read full review

reviewer2113719

Technical Support Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Internal API gateway has improved security frameworks and now provides unified API visibility

The best features Tyk offers are highly customizable options, effective traffic management, and security, making it easy to configure and use. The customizability of Tyk is evident in our validation of the token—specifically with our internal identity and access management. There were challenges on the network side and in managing token validity and the public key, but Tyk allowed us to configure these aspects effectively. I believe those are the standard out-of-the-box capabilities provided by Tyk that we are using, particularly regarding traffic management and security. Tyk has positively impacted my organization by providing standard API management capabilities, such as a single view for all APIs, discoverability, and role-based access control for overseeing who can see which APIs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I work for an information security company. CA API Management is capable of using tokens for authorization to manage access control for the APIs."

"The out-of-the-box security features are useful. Right now, you can just right-click and drag and drop the assertions with the rate limit. That, as well as the x-amount surge protection, is built in so we can bring that in."

"The actual management of APIs is fundamental to us, as we're a heavy API user/provider. So, obviously, a centralised management platform is important."

"Every API that we get from external or from internal goes through this layer first, and it should not be a bottleneck. That was the problem we had before. Now it's no longer a bottleneck. It's more like a throughput, this process is less than 10 milliseconds for any particular API."

"The solution has numerous configuration options to increase security in communication."

"I love the API Gateway, especially the architecture, in terms of the composability of the policies. We approach it from a very software-engineering approach.We build on the policies, like legal blocks, and we deploy them throughout different environments. It's been working out great for us."

"The administration interface (Policy Manager) is very easy to understand and use."

"We can create multiple orgs and set up policies and management. We can also integrate with an APM solution"

More Layer7 API Management pros

"It is a good product for API management."

"The feature I find most valuable is that this solution allows us to manage our security."

"Customer support is excellent, and their support personnel, along with professional services, know the product really well, resulting in a good experience dealing with them."

"The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good."

"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality."

"You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic."

"The most valuable feature is the load balancing with the circuit-breaker function."

Cons

"One area where it certainly needs to improve is the way it allocates requests, in terms of rate limiting. Also, there is no native Kafka connectivity."

"CA double up portal is a pain. It is something that we are struggling with right now."

"They should incorporate deeper monitoring features into the solution to make the offering more complete. Doing so would help to showcase traffic patterns and usage to better engage customers and partners proactively. It would also help with API management and capacity planning."

"The product's initial setup phase is not very straightforward, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The only issue we have is that we have to buy an APM license separately for end-to-end monitoring."

"There is room for improvement in terms of innovation and investment, especially when compared to other leading products in the market."

"There is still room for improvement for the CA API Developer Portal. It is still not on par with what the competencies are."

"The CA API Management solution has good security features, but when it comes to being used in areas like enterprise integration, where it is being used as middleware for all the IT environments, that particular feature is quite limited. It doesn't support as many protocols as an industry standard, competing product should."

More Layer7 API Management cons

"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language."

"In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them."

"We ran it for a while, but then we decided to move away from Tyk, because Tyk's cloud version, the SaaS version, has a significant limitation of limited flexibility, so you can't program very much."

"It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."

"We would like a better tool for generating documentation for the APIs to be developed."

"Compared to Apigee or Kong, I find they excel beyond Tyk, which is the reason for my score."

"Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product."

"I feel that it is costly for medium-sized companies."

"There are various licensing models for Layer7 API Management. We have to buy additional licenses to get new versions."

"CA API Management has a licensing path. If you want more features, it requires more licenses and more installation time."

"It was very high at that time. We are a Broadcom CA partner, and we got it only for testing purposes. We didn't pay anything for it."

"If the CA pricing for API management would be a little lower, they would be able to cover a broader market."

"Do not buy piecemeal."

"If you do a TCO of more than five years, then you will see a big jump in costs for some vendors."

More Layer7 API Management pricing and cost advice

"The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."

"We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."

"There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."

"The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."

"It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	84

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Layer7 API Management?

The solution's technical support is good.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?

Pricing is more than average. While I am used to Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ), seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.

What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?

Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies. The migration path sometime...

What needs improvement with Tyk?

Tyk can improve in terms of AI capabilities, and the developer portal could benefit from enhancements such as user onboarding workflows. The developer community could be better, especially compared...

What is your primary use case for Tyk?

My main use case for Tyk is for internal API gateway. For a banking customer, I have internal APIs and external APIs, where internal APIs are mostly on Kubernetes. For internal API gateway, we have...

What advice do you have for others considering Tyk?

While we could not quantify any commercial improvement, developer experience has definitely improved. I would rate Tyk around an eight on a scale of one to ten because I have worked with other API ...

Apigee vs Layer7 API Management

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 9% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Layer7 API Management Competitors

Apigee vs Tyk

Compared 14% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Tyk

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk

Compared 8% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Tyk

Compared 8% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Tyk

Compared 3% of the time

More Tyk Competitors

Product Reports

Download Layer7 API Management product report

Layer7 API Management

January 2026

Download Tyk product report

January 2026

Also Known As

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway

No data available

Overview

Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.

It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.

With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

Broadcom

Tyk is an open source API Gateway that is fast and scalable, an API management platform featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. Available in three flavours to best suit your architecture and governance. We offer full cloud or on-premises options, and the best of both worlds with our unique hybrid model. www.tyk.io

Sample Customers

1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Oracle 4. Salesforce 5. SAP 6. Cisco 7. Dell 8. HP 9. Adobe 10. VMware 11. Accenture 12. Capgemini 13. Deloitte 14. PwC 15. Ernst & Young 16. Infosys 17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) 18. Wipro 19. Cognizant 20. HCL Technologies 21. Tech Mahindra 22. Fujitsu 23. Hitachi 24. NEC 25. NTT Data 26. Ericsson 27. Nokia 28. Siemens 29. AT&T 30. Verizon 31. Vodafone 32. Orange

Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T