Layer7 API Management vs Tyk comparison

Read 7 Tyk reviews

1,919 Views
1,919 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Layer7 API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Layer7 API Management and Tyk are strong competitors in the API management sector. Based on features, deployment, and pricing, Tyk appears to have the upper hand in flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while Layer7 excels in enterprise integration and support.

Features:Layer7 API Management is noted for its security protocols, enterprise-grade integration, and robust gateway functions. Tyk is praised for its open-source licensing, lightweight architecture, and rapid deployment capabilities.

Room for Improvement:Layer7 could enhance its user interface and reduce complexity in integrations. It might also benefit from a more competitive pricing model. Tyk might improve by enhancing its enterprise support options and expanding feature sets beyond the open-source framework. Additionally, Tyk has room to increase cloud support options for broader adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Layer7 offers a structured deployment model fit for complex enterprise environments, providing formalized support. Tyk supports multiple deployment options, including cloud-native, with community-driven support that is more agile and responsive.

Pricing and ROI:Layer7 involves substantial upfront costs due to its extensive enterprise features, which can result in a longer ROI. Tyk, with its open-source core and optional premium add-ons, usually has a lower initial cost and quicker ROI, appealing more to startups and mid-sized companies.

To learn more, read our detailed Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Layer7 API Management

Ranking in API Management

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tyk

Ranking in API Management

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Layer7 API Management is 2.3%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tyk is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Layer7 API Management	2.3%
Tyk	2.1%
Other	95.6%

API Management

Featured Reviews

C Vvanigalla

Works

Integration capabilities excel and support for varied platforms enhances communication across backend systems

We mainly use REST APIs, and the solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It allows communication with a number of back-end providers and data consolidation. The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable. Code changes and migration are straightforward, and it supports identity and access management integration.

Read full review

reviewer2113719

Technical Support Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Internal API gateway has improved security frameworks and now provides unified API visibility

The best features Tyk offers are highly customizable options, effective traffic management, and security, making it easy to configure and use. The customizability of Tyk is evident in our validation of the token—specifically with our internal identity and access management. There were challenges on the network side and in managing token validity and the public key, but Tyk allowed us to configure these aspects effectively. I believe those are the standard out-of-the-box capabilities provided by Tyk that we are using, particularly regarding traffic management and security. Tyk has positively impacted my organization by providing standard API management capabilities, such as a single view for all APIs, discoverability, and role-based access control for overseeing who can see which APIs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's pretty easy to use, and once we have templating set up we can add new APIs, at least through the gateway, and apply the security to them; it takes a minute."

"I appreciate Layer 7 API management for its comprehensive approach to the entire API lifecycle, including governance, management, and analytics."

"The benefits are rapid development and deployment of APIs, which means that your information, your ability to handle information, to receive it and to send it, to visualize it, to report on it, to get intelligence out of it, happens fast and happens with accuracy."

"The Gateway can front our APIs very easily."

"Some of the performance matrix that API Gateway gives off, we monitor them via SNMP traps, and then we tie them into our monitoring system. You can actually monitor some of the latencies and some of the performance aspects of both API Gateways, as well back end services. So having that line of sight surely helps in terms DevOps."

"The product documentation helps the client and/or user to evolve quickly while using the tool."

"You can create little, custom Java assertions that you can insert to do your business logic, which might not be covered by the commercial product out-of-the-box."

"For developers to be able to come, sign up, or find APIs."

More Layer7 API Management pros

"You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic."

"Customer support is excellent, and their support personnel, along with professional services, know the product really well, resulting in a good experience dealing with them."

"The most valuable feature is the load balancing with the circuit-breaker function."

"The feature I find most valuable is that this solution allows us to manage our security."

"It is a good product for API management."

"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality."

"The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good."

Cons

"One specific feature that we need is the ability to authenticate directly to the server with API data. It's not complex nowadays. This is a feature that we need and CA doesn't have it."

"The interface should be improved."

"Layer7 API Management could be improved in its logging and alert mechanisms."

"The Portal lacks maturity. Since the move from Portal 3.x to 4.x, a lot of features were removed. It is slowly coming back. I can see a lot of changes are done in the "background" to decouple components and make it more flexible. Those changes are just not getting to the UI side quick enough."

"On the monitoring side, we need a better way to monitor it. CA has not given a clear understanding of what external tools we can use to do this."

"More developer focused tools. They have a nice debugger inside of the program, but when you are developing code with their policies, it is tough to visualize that sometimes as a developer."

"There could be more integration options included in the product."

"Layer7 API Management should improve the quota policy for the number of API calls."

More Layer7 API Management cons

"Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable."

"We would like a better tool for generating documentation for the APIs to be developed."

"Compared to Apigee or Kong, I find they excel beyond Tyk, which is the reason for my score."

"We ran it for a while, but then we decided to move away from Tyk, because Tyk's cloud version, the SaaS version, has a significant limitation of limited flexibility, so you can't program very much."

"In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them."

"It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."

"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Layer7 API Management is too high and should be reduced. However, it is a good solution in the market."

"There is an annual license for the use of this solution. I think we are paying for some support maintenance fees, included in that license. I don't know how it works. They should provide more information."

"We weren't comfortable with the pricing of licensing. It was slightly more expensive than its competitors."

"Be aware of additional licenses for your warm standby. Ensure you get plenty of non-production licenses."

"CA has great pricing for gateways, so negotiate with your sales team."

"It depends on your use case of course, how much you want to go with that, because it can get pricey and depends on the size of your company."

"It has a reasonable pricing model by instance."

"The price of Layer7 API Management is reasonable compared to Apigee."

More Layer7 API Management pricing and cost advice

"The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."

"We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."

"The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."

"It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."

"There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	84

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Layer7 API Management?

The solution's technical support is good.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?

Pricing is more than average. While I am used to Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ), seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.

What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?

Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies. The migration path sometime...

What do you like most about Tyk?

The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tyk?

The pricing is actually quite competitive. In Azure environments, it gets beaten by Microsoft API Gateway, but on the other hand, it offers some features that Microsoft lacks. So it really comes do...

What needs improvement with Tyk?

In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly ...

Apigee vs Layer7 API Management

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 13% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 10% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Layer7 API Management Competitors

Apigee vs Tyk

Compared 13% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Tyk

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk

Compared 9% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Tyk

Compared 9% of the time

More Tyk Competitors

Product Reports

Download Layer7 API Management product report

Layer7 API Management

January 2026

Download Tyk product report

January 2026

Also Known As

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway

No data available

Overview

Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.

It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.

With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

Broadcom

Tyk is an open source API Gateway that is fast and scalable, an API management platform featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. Available in three flavours to best suit your architecture and governance. We offer full cloud or on-premises options, and the best of both worlds with our unique hybrid model. www.tyk.io

Sample Customers

1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Oracle 4. Salesforce 5. SAP 6. Cisco 7. Dell 8. HP 9. Adobe 10. VMware 11. Accenture 12. Capgemini 13. Deloitte 14. PwC 15. Ernst & Young 16. Infosys 17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) 18. Wipro 19. Cognizant 20. HCL Technologies 21. Tech Mahindra 22. Fujitsu 23. Hitachi 24. NEC 25. NTT Data 26. Ericsson 27. Nokia 28. Siemens 29. AT&T 30. Verizon 31. Vodafone 32. Orange

Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T