Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Layer7 API Management vs Tyk comparison

Broadcom and Tyk are both solutions in the API Management category. Broadcom is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.6, while Tyk is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 2.9% mindshare in APIM, compared to Tyk’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tyk users who would recommend it.
Layer7 API Management
Read 112 Layer7 API Management reviews
  • 4,008 Views
  • 4,008 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Tyk
Read 6 Tyk reviews
  • 2,180 Views
  • 2,180 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Layer7 API Management and Tyk are strong competitors in the API management sector. Based on features, deployment, and pricing, Tyk appears to have the upper hand in flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while Layer7 excels in enterprise integration and support.

Features:Layer7 API Management is noted for its security protocols, enterprise-grade integration, and robust gateway functions. Tyk is praised for its open-source licensing, lightweight architecture, and rapid deployment capabilities.

Room for Improvement:Layer7 could enhance its user interface and reduce complexity in integrations. It might also benefit from a more competitive pricing model. Tyk might improve by enhancing its enterprise support options and expanding feature sets beyond the open-source framework. Additionally, Tyk has room to increase cloud support options for broader adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Layer7 offers a structured deployment model fit for complex enterprise environments, providing formalized support. Tyk supports multiple deployment options, including cloud-native, with community-driven support that is more agile and responsive.

Pricing and ROI:Layer7 involves substantial upfront costs due to its extensive enterprise features, which can result in a longer ROI. Tyk, with its open-source core and optional premium add-ons, usually has a lower initial cost and quicker ROI, appealing more to startups and mid-sized companies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Layer7 API Management
Ranking in API Management
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tyk
Ranking in API Management
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Layer7 API Management is 2.9%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tyk is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

NikhilChaudhari - PeerSpot reviewer
Valued for its drag-and-drop functionalities, the available policy options, and the excellent security features
I work as a PG developer, primarily dealing with Layer7 API Management and MuleSoft API management. My focus is mainly on VM management platforms such as Layer7 and Apigee Layer7 API Management is most valued for its drag-and-drop functionalities, the available policy options, and the excellent…
Read full review
MarkDoherty - PeerSpot reviewer
Fastest to get up and running and fewer idiosyncrasies than competitors
In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them. But as a product, it's very difficult to find any major faults.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the security with its out-of-the-box policies."
"From a security standpoint, it works great. It is the right solution for us. It's lightweight, a software-appliance configuration which was easy to deploy and configure."
"It is a stable product."
"Almost all security features are available out-of-the-box and can be deployed rapidly."
"We have more than 50 applications in the backend. We monitor the infrastructure through a database monitoring tool. Our daily tasks involve working on P1 incidents, managing change requests, conducting patching updates, working on P2 tickets, backend server certificate renewals, etc."
"Technical support is excellent, and I would rate them as ten."
"There are a few assertions which are built-in for threat protection. I have used them for vulnerabilities, like for DDoS attacks, XML schema validation, IP restriction, and for cross-domain."
"Scalability: API Gateway is easily scalable horizontally and managed easily."
More Layer7 API Management pros
"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality."
"The feature I find most valuable is that this solution allows us to manage our security."
"It is a good product for API management."
"You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic."
"The most valuable feature is the load balancing with the circuit-breaker function."
"The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good."
 

Cons

"The Portal is not stable."
"The development toolkit used for creating APIs should be more online and user-friendly. Deployment and tracking could also be improved. Tools like Apigee provide a complete online experience along with RESTful APIs, to manage all activities. It is a very nice and user-friendly solution compared to CA."
"Layer7 API Management should give a clear roadmap of the product and where it is going, and they should not change the underlying layers."
"Layer7 API Management’s price could be reduced."
"Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies."
"As well as the SOA Gateway - that is, the API Gateway; we call it the SOA Gateway - we also are now deploying the developer portal component of the SOA Gateway. That has limitations."
"They need a multifactor authentication solution for the API layer and the other layers, as well."
"The product needs to keep up with newer trends even though customers might not be requesting it yet."
More Layer7 API Management cons
"We ran it for a while, but then we decided to move away from Tyk, because Tyk's cloud version, the SaaS version, has a significant limitation of limited flexibility, so you can't program very much."
"It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."
"We would like a better tool for generating documentation for the APIs to be developed."
"Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable."
"In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them."
"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CA has great pricing for gateways, so negotiate with your sales team."
"There are various licensing models for Layer7 API Management. We have to buy additional licenses to get new versions."
"CA API Management has a licensing path. If you want more features, it requires more licenses and more installation time."
"Be aware of additional licenses for your warm standby. Ensure you get plenty of non-production licenses."
"This solution is a bit more expensive than competitors."
"It is a pricey product, although not extremely overpriced compared to competitors in the market."
"Keep in mind the non-product licensing, e.g., if you opt not to use the embedded SQL."
"It has a reasonable pricing model by instance."
More Layer7 API Management pricing and cost advice
"It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."
"There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."
"We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."
"The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."
"The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Layer7 API Management?
The solution's technical support is good.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?
Pricing is more than average. While I am used to Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ), seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?
Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies. The migration path sometime...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tyk?
The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tyk?
The pricing is actually quite competitive. In Azure environments, it gets beaten by Microsoft API Gateway, but on the other hand, it offers some features that Microsoft lacks. So it really comes do...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tyk?
In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Apigee vs Layer7 API Management Logo
Apigee vs Layer7 API Management
Compared 28% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Layer7 API Management Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Layer7 API Management
Compared 14% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management
Compared 13% of the time
MuleSoft API Manager vs Layer7 API Management Logo
MuleSoft API Manager vs Layer7 API Management
Compared 12% of the time
Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs Layer7 API Management Logo
Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs Layer7 API Management
Compared 1% of the time
More Layer7 API Management Competitors
Traefik Enterprise vs Tyk Logo
Traefik Enterprise vs Tyk
Compared 15% of the time
Apache APISIX vs Tyk Logo
Apache APISIX vs Tyk
Compared 14% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Tyk
Compared 11% of the time
Apigee vs Tyk Logo
Apigee vs Tyk
Compared 10% of the time
More Tyk Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Layer7 API Management
July 2025
Layer7 API Management reportDownload Layer7 API Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Tyk
June 2025
Tyk reportDownload Tyk product report
 

Also Known As

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway
No data available
 

Overview

Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs. 

It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic. 

With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

Broadcom
Tyk is an open source API Gateway that is fast and scalable, an API management platform featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. Available in three flavours to best suit your architecture and governance. We offer full cloud or on-premises options, and the best of both worlds with our unique hybrid model. www.tyk.io
Tyk
 

Sample Customers

1. IBM  2. Microsoft  3. Oracle  4. Salesforce  5. SAP  6. Cisco  7. Dell  8. HP  9. Adobe  10. VMware  11. Accenture  12. Capgemini  13. Deloitte  14. PwC  15. Ernst & Young  16. Infosys  17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)  18. Wipro  19. Cognizant  20. HCL Technologies  21. Tech Mahindra  22. Fujitsu  23. Hitachi  24. NEC  25. NTT Data  26. Ericsson  27. Nokia  28. Siemens  29. AT&T  30. Verizon  31. Vodafone  32. Orange
Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T
Buyer's Guide
Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk
July 2025
Free Report: Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk
Find out what your peers are saying about Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Layer7 API Management vs. Tyk report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.