"It has good protocol coverage."
"The most useful aspect of the solution is that it provides agents in different geographic locations."
"The solution can handle a huge amount of workloads, it's quite scalable."
"What we like the most is that it integrates with UC."
"Paramterization and correlation are important features."
"The most important feature for us is that it supports a lot of protocols because we support all of them, including HTTP, FTP, mainframe, and others."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"The stability has always been very good."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"We are going to continue to use the product in the future, I recommend this product. However, those who are looking for only REST-based on the API, I would recommend some other tool because of the cost. There are others available on the market."
"The solution is very costly. The cost is very high, especially considering a lot of other resources are available now and they are less expensive. For a small organization, it is very difficult to sustain the costs involved in having the solution or the related fees"
"Licensing costs could be reduced."
"The product is pretty heavy and should be more lightweight."
"I would like to see better-licensing costs."
"The product is not stable and reliable in the version we are currently using."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The solution is quite expensive."
Earn 20 points
LoadRunner is the Micro Focus industry-standard software solution for application performance and load testing. LoadRunner stresses your entire system to isolate and identify potential client, network, and server bottlenecks, supporting performance testing of new technologies together with your existing, legacy applications.
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Will Enable You To:
With Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional You Can:
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Features:
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Benefits:
Reviews from Real Users:
"The most useful aspect of the solution is that it provides agents in different geographic locations.” - Head, Testing Centre of Excellence at NIIT Technologies Limited
"The most important feature for us is that it supports a lot of protocols because we support all of them, including HTTP, FTP, mainframe, and others.” - Test Automation, DevOps & Performance Engineering at a financial services firm
"The solution can handle a huge amount of workloads, it's quite scalable.” - Regional Head Customer Experience at a financial services firm
"The reporting mechanism is a valuable feature that generates good reports.” - Senior Architect at a computer software company
Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is rated 7.4, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional writes "Very good controller and a market leader, but not cost effective for small business". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Offers lots of features, including memory analysis and code sharing". Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Tricentis NeoLoad, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and BlazeMeter, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and froglogic Squish.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.