OpenText Core Application Security vs Veracode comparison

OpenText Core Application S...

Read 207 Veracode reviews

18,784 Views
12,210 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Veracode and OpenText Core Application Security compete in the application security space. Veracode appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and ease of cloud deployment.

Features: Veracode offers a range of features including static, dynamic, and manual scans, low false-positive rates, and robust cloud-based scalability. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Jenkins and IDEs. OpenText Core Application Security supports a variety of technologies and environments, focuses on integration into existing systems, and follows a modular approach.

Room for Improvement: Veracode could benefit from reducing false positives further, improving the integration of scanning features, and enhancing its user interface. It can also expand language and framework support and improve reporting capabilities. OpenText Core Application Security could enhance its dynamic testing capabilities and integrate with more platforms. It would also benefit from improving its UX for module consistency and offering more detailed remediation guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode supports cloud-based deployments that provide flexibility across different cloud environments. While its support is responsive, some users report delays in complex issue resolution. OpenText Core Application Security excels in on-premises deployments, offering excellent support with quick resolutions and expert consultation, though users suggest better integration and setup processes.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode is seen as a valuable, albeit premium, solution with a flexible but complex pricing model based on application profiles and scan types. Despite its cost, it offers significant ROI through reduced development hours and increased security assurance. OpenText Core Application Security, although expensive, offers competitive pricing and value in comprehensive vulnerability management, but the cost may deter smaller businesses. Both solutions demonstrate strong ROI through improved application security and compliance.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Application Security vs. Veracode Report (Updated: December 2025).

OpenText Core Application Security vs. Veracode

Download the complete report

Helped 879,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.5

OpenText Core enhances security by proactively reducing risks and saving time, ensuring operational continuity and data protection.

Sentiment score

6.6

Veracode enhances code security and quality, saves time and costs, supports compliance, and boosts client trust and retention.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

The scanners of Veracode bring status of the weaknesses in the current infrastructure. It scans and provides reports regarding the servers, the network, and the applications running on those servers.

AlejandroMosso

Senior Solutions Architect at IDS Comercial

Regarding price, the evaluation should focus on how efficiently they will recover their investment, considering the time saved through the use of Veracode Fix, for example, and the ability to fix code at dev time compared to the problems faced when fixing after the product is already deployed.

reviewer2703864

Head of Security Architecture at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

We did see a return on investment with Veracode, as we segregated our remediation efforts, which reduced our time to delivery as well as the number of engineers needed to help us in delivering a secure solution.

reviewer2774562

DevSecOps Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.8

OpenText Core Application Security support is effective but mixed, with slow responses and communication gaps affecting issue resolution.

Sentiment score

7.2

Veracode support is praised for expertise and responsiveness, but some users report delays and unhelpful interactions with complex issues.

Support tickets often stay open for one month to three months, which leads to customer frustration.

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

I had direct interaction with them, which facilitated how we onboarded Fortify.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Access to the engineering team is crucial for faster feedback on the product fix process.

SrikanthRaghavan

Principal Architect at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

I have communicated with the technical support of Veracode a couple of times, and this was a really great experience because these professionals know their material.

Andrei Kriukov

Application Security Specialist at Herrenknecht

They share detailed information via email, including screenshots or further clarification about the issue.

reviewer2753535

DevSecOps Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.9

OpenText Core Application Security is praised for scalability and enterprise adaptability, though pricing flexibility presents challenges for some users.

Sentiment score

7.5

Veracode offers impressive scalability, efficiently handling growth and multiple applications, despite some licensing challenges, earning high user ratings.

If a customer wants to know the tools and the technology used for their application to scan their application, they provide less information on that.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Cloud solutions are easier to scale than on-premise solutions.

AlejandroMosso

Senior Solutions Architect at IDS Comercial

It has a good capacity to scale effectively.

Brintha Prabakar

Lead Automation Quality Engineer in Leading UK Bank at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Implementing these features into our normal CI/CD was good, so I can say that scalability is really good.

Andrei Kriukov

Application Security Specialist at Herrenknecht

For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.8

OpenText Core is reliable and stable, with occasional resource issues and high system requirements, often rated 7-10/10.

Sentiment score

7.8

Veracode is highly reliable with minimal downtime and issues, though occasional scan speed and false positive concerns exist.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

If the Veracode server is down, we experience many issues during the scan.

Brintha Prabakar

Lead Automation Quality Engineer in Leading UK Bank at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

It's not that easy to onboard, but once they have been onboarded on the platform, and the pipeline configured alongside the product configured, it works effectively.

reviewer2703864

Head of Security Architecture at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report

Room For Improvement

OpenText Core needs improved reporting, integration, automation, language support, pricing clarity, CI/CD features, and enhanced interface for security.

Veracode users face false positives, outdated UI, integration issues, slow scans, and desire flexible pricing and improved support.

It would be beneficial if Fortify could check for CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) in third-party libraries, which I currently use a separate dependency checker tool for.

reviewer2646048

Lead Developer at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

It would be better for Fortify on Demand if they could analyze not only the security pillar but also maintainability, portability, and reliability, covering all pillars of ISO 25000.

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

If it could be integrated directly with code repositories such as Bitbucket or GitHub, without the need to create a pipeline to upload and decode code, it would simplify the code scan process significantly.

Himadri Subudhi

Works

We had issues with scanning large applications. Scanning took a lot of time, so we kept it outside the DevOps pipeline to avoid delaying deployments.

Brintha Prabakar

Lead Automation Quality Engineer in Leading UK Bank at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

A nice addition would be if it could be extended for scenarios with custom cleansers.

reviewer2700198

IT App Security Senior Analyst at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find OpenText Core Application Security expensive, yet appreciate its robust features and scalable, cost-effective cloud options.

Veracode's pricing is costly, but its features suit large enterprises; smaller businesses should consider alternatives due to budget constraints.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

It's not the most expensive solution.

AlejandroMosso

Senior Solutions Architect at IDS Comercial

Overall, Veracode's pricing is lower and more scalable than many alternatives in the market.

reviewer2753535

DevSecOps Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

If there's a security gap, you'll never know the cost or effect.

Himadri Subudhi

Works

For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report

Valuable Features

OpenText Core ensures compliance, accurate security scans, DevOps integration, and cost-effective code analysis with low false positives.

Veracode provides comprehensive code analysis, vulnerability management, and integration tools, enhancing security and supporting complex project needs efficiently.

Fortify helps me find serious issues, such as developers inadvertently leaving access tokens, including API access tokens, in the source code.

reviewer2646048

Lead Developer at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

On demand you have two levels of reports: the first from the tool, which is the same as we can get from Fortify on-premises, and a next level reporting made by experts from OpenText, leading to a more condensed and precise report as level three.

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

Additionally, you can integrate Fortify in CICD pipeline, so you get real-time updates about the security issues in your pipeline.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Core Application Security report

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

It offers confidence by preventing exposure to vulnerabilities and helps ensure that we are not deploying vulnerable code into production.

Kv Rao

Site Leader (India) at Industrial Scientific

The best features in Veracode include static analysis and the early detection of vulnerable libraries; it integrates with tools such as Jenkins.

Himadri Subudhi

Works

It fixes issues directly in the IDE while you're doing it.

reviewer2700198

IT App Security Senior Analyst at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Application S...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

13th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Ranking in Application Security Tools

2nd

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

207

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (8th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (3rd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 3.4%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 6.1%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Veracode	6.1%
OpenText Core Application Security	3.4%
Other	90.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Supports secure development pipelines and improves issue detection but limits internal visibility and needs broader dashboard integration

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. That was the only reason we migrated from Fortify on Demand to another solution. Fortify has another tool which is Fortify WebInspect. On Demand is the outsourcing solution, and WebInspect you can use with your in-house team, which is basically the product developed by the Fortify team. For automated scanning, Fortify helps a lot. Regarding the visibility for the internal team, everyone is moving toward the DevSecOps side, and Fortify team has made good progress that you can integrate into your CICD pipeline. One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together. If you have one tool that works for different solutions, it helps a lot. They are doing good, but they should invest more on the AI side as well because AI security is evolving these days. On the cloud side, they have already made good progress, but I believe they should explore the new area related to AI security as well.

Read full review

reviewer2703864

Head of Security Architecture at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Onboarding developers successfully while improving code security through IDE integration

Regarding room for improvement, we have some problems when onboarding new projects because the build process has to be done in a certain way, as Veracode analyzes the binaries and not the code by itself alone. If the process is not configured correctly, it doesn't work. That's one of the things that we are discussing with Veracode. Something positive that we've been able to do is submit formal feature requests to them, and they are working on them; they've already solved some of them. This encourages us to propose new ideas and improvements. Another improvement that we asked for this use case is to be able to configure how Veracode Fix proposes and fixes because sometimes it makes proposals using libraries that go against our architecture design made by the enterprise architecture team. For example, we want them to propose using another library, and that's something we already asked Veracode, and they are working on it. We want to specify when you see this kind of vulnerability, you can only propose these two options.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	44

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	70
Midsize Enterprise	44
Large Enterprise	113

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

What do you like most about Veracode Static Analysis?

I like its integration with GitHub. I like using it from GitHub. I can use the GitHub URL and find out the vulnerabilities.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 6% of the time

HCL AppScan vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 14% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Veracode

Compared 4% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Core Application Security

Download OpenText Core Application Security product report

OpenText Core Application Security report

Download Veracode product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?

Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

OpenText Core Application Security vs. Veracode