Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mezmo vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Mezmo and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Mezmo is ranked #89, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Mezmo holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Mezmo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Mezmo
Read 2 Mezmo reviews
  • 494 Views
  • 237 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Splunk AppDynamics
Read 249 Splunk AppDynamics reviews
  • 13,425 Views
  • 10,740 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on May 11, 2025

Splunk AppDynamics and Mezmo are competing products in the data monitoring and analysis space, where Splunk AppDynamics seems to have an advantage in support and integration, while Mezmo stands out for competitive pricing and features.

Features:Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced analytics, comprehensive dashboards, and robust integration capabilities. Mezmo is known for real-time log management, simple configuration, and flexibility in data management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Splunk AppDynamics provides a traditional deployment model with extensive support, whereas Mezmo focuses on a streamlined, adaptable deployment experience with responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI:Splunk AppDynamics involves higher initial costs but promises long-term ROI for large enterprises. Mezmo offers more affordable setup costs, making it appealing for smaller businesses seeking quick ROI with a budget-conscious approach.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Mezmo vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Mezmo vs. Splunk AppDynamics
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Mezmo
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
89th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (54th), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)
Splunk AppDynamics
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
249
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (5th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Mezmo is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 4.6%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

TO
It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities
Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.
Read full review
Gyanesh Rahatekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Application performance management and error resolution improved with data-driven insights
Dynatrace has multiple functions compared to Splunk AppDynamics, so Splunk AppDynamics should add those functions, which are not available as of now. Dynatrace has a universal agent that collects all information related to their CI, and if one CI has multiple languages, then there is no need to instrument multiple agents. However, Splunk AppDynamics requires multiple agents; if I have one server with multiple applications in different languages, then I need to instrument different agents for each application. Splunk AppDynamics should work with Dynatrace with one single universal agent that works with all application languages, eliminating the need for multiple implementations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"The alert mechanism in AppDynamics enhances server management tasks by using agents installed on each server."
"The feature that is most valuable to us is the snapshot feature. It allows us to get a snapshot of different SQL scripts that are being executed simultaneously and we can identify everything we need on them."
"The transaction snapshots let you find out where the application broke; it pinpoints where in the call stack, and then how long it took to resolve."
"AppDynamics provides us with detailed information about the performance of the underlying infrastructure, including servers, databases, and external services."
"After we implemented this solution, we can easily determine the root cause of issues."
"AppDynamics is easy to implement if you follow the documentation, and the documentation that they provide is good."
"We were able to correct problems, which led to an increase in availability, time savings, and performance for our solutions."
"Applications: This provides us insight into how our applications are performing within our environments and affords us the ability to identify opportunities and make changes to code / environment to effect positive performance lift."
More Splunk AppDynamics pros
 

Cons

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Splunk AppDynamics requires multiple agents; if I have one server with multiple applications in different languages, then I need to instrument different agents for each application."
"The infrastructure is not as good as other solutions."
"AppDynamics' modules and hardware resources are very high."
"They are using Flash for their website, which is very slow. We had hoped the website would be much faster to use, and that is definitely what we want to see."
"There needs to be an option to capture all the sessions for all the users, not just samplings."
"There are certain limitations with the agents in the solution"
"The AppDynamics installation process needs to be more straightforward. Deploying the product is also tricky."
More Splunk AppDynamics cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The cost is prohibitive."
"It's a very expensive product. Each of the licenses after this month for one server is around $9,000 or $10,000."
"The licensing scheme is very complex. They need to make it easier."
"The way it is structured in terms of price could be better. You pay for individual modules and that adds on to the cost, which detracts you from implementing those modules and slows you down."
"There were no added costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"There is an annual cost for the use of this solution."
"We do not have any issues with the price."
"Because it is priced per JVM, the price can increase pretty fast, into the millions. We have had challenges because we had to justify the price to our clients, as well, when we are putting in certain tools."
More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Educational Organization
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
See all answers
APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...
See all answers
What do you like most about AppDynamics?
The solution saves time and cost.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Mezmo Logo
Datadog vs Mezmo
Compared 48% of the time
Cribl vs Mezmo Logo
Cribl vs Mezmo
Compared 30% of the time
Grafana Loki vs Mezmo Logo
Grafana Loki vs Mezmo
Compared 22% of the time
More Mezmo Competitors
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 14% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 9% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 8% of the time
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 8% of the time
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 5% of the time
More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cribl vs. Mezmo
June 2025
Mezmo reportDownload Mezmo product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk AppDynamics
June 2025
Splunk AppDynamics reportDownload Splunk AppDynamics product report
 

Also Known As

LogDNA
No data available
 

Overview

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?
  • Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
  • Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
  • JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
  • Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
  • Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.
How does AppDynamics benefit users?
  • Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
  • Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
  • Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
  • Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Buyer's Guide
Mezmo vs. Splunk AppDynamics
July 2025
Free Report: Mezmo vs. Splunk AppDynamics
Find out what your peers are saying about Mezmo vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Mezmo vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.