"We find it intuitive and easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"There are free online learning and certifications if a user would like to learn more and better understand the solution."
"The most valuable features are the integration and UI customization."
"It is stable."
"You can scale the solution."
"The most valuable features are the decorative style, model-driven development, and the fact that Mendix validates flows. Mendix is quick to develop because it's a low-code platform. It's very robust, flexible, open, and scalable. It's for a low-code customer. The tooling is also really good and it has mobile capabilities."
"They are leading in the smart manufacturing, and connectivity space."
"In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with this solution and it integrates with all tools that we need. If you want to integrate with other solutions such ThreatFire or similar, it is possible as well."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"The solution has very helpful technical support."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."
"You need experienced programmers and developers to understand this solution."
"There's no direct tech support."
"Mendix is slightly less scalable than I'd like."
"There are not enough developers who are using Mendix. The knowledge base available online and in the market is not as rich as other competitors."
"It is expensive."
"There needs to be an increase in the number of the UI components."
"My understanding is that, if you are not using the free version, it is very expensive."
"While the community is great, they need to work on making their direct technical support services better."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"It's called a local platform but on the other hand, it needs a lot of experience. It's not all that easy to click and plug and play. If you really want to use all the features out of this platform, you definitely need a lot of experience and a lot of training to get there."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"Pega's technical support could be better."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now."
"The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed."
Mendix is ranked 6th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 4th in Rapid Application Development Software with 23 reviews. Mendix is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mendix writes "Low-code/no-code and has microflows, nanoflows, and data model access features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Good case management and BPM workflow with easy cloud implementation". Mendix is most compared with Microsoft PowerApps, OutSystems, Appian, Oracle Application Express (APEX) and ServiceNow, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with Camunda Platform, ServiceNow, Appian, IBM BPM and OutSystems. See our Mendix vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
