We performed a comparison between McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)."The log analysis is excellent; it can predict what can or will happen regarding use patterns and vulnerabilities."
"The dashboard that allows me to view all the incidents is the most valuable feature."
"Sentinel uses Azure Logic Apps for automation, which is really powerful. This allows us to easily automate responses to incidents."
"The data connectors that Microsoft Sentinel provides are easy to integrate when we work with a Microsoft agent."
"The connectivity and analytics are great."
"Log aggregation and data connectors are the most valuable features."
"It's pretty powerful and its performance is pretty good."
"The Log analytics are useful."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the antivirus and the DLP."
"The best part is management in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's performance is good."
"Application control and traffic encryption are the most valuable features."
"Technical support is very helpful."
"The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly."
"Their support is really good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. I have never any issues with their support. They always reply and follow our queries on time."
"You have to have some experience, however, it's pretty simple to understand."
"They do a better job of determining what's real and what's not than most of the other solutions we have tried, and it's been very painless to use."
More Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix Pros →
"We'd like to see more connectors."
"The data connectors for third-party tools could be improved, as some aren't available in Sentinel. They need to be available in the data connector panel."
"Sometimes, we are observing large ingestion delays. We expect logs within 5 minutes, but it takes about 10 to 15 minutes."
"Sentinel can be used in two ways. With other tools like QRadar, I don't need to run queries. Using Sentinel requires users to learn KQL to run technical queries and check things. If they don't know KQL, they can't fully utilize the solution."
"The dashboards can be improved. Creating dashboards is very easy, but the visualizations are not as good as Microsoft Power BI. People who are using Microsoft Power BI do not like Sentinel's dashboards."
"They can work on the EDR side of things... Every time we need to onboard these kinds of machines into the EDR, we need to do it with the help of Intune, to sync up the devices, and do the configuration. I'm looking for something on the EDR side that will reduce this kind of work."
"Sentinel could improve its ticketing and management. A few customers I have worked with liked to take the data created in Sentinel. You can make some basic efforts around that, but the customers wanted to push it to a third-party system so they could set up a proper ticketing management system, like ServiceNow, Jira, etc."
"The performance could be improved. If I create 15 to 20 lines for a single-use case in KQL, sometimes it takes more time to execute. If I create use cases within a certain timeline, the result will show in .01 seconds. A complex query takes more time to get results."
"The issues with the integration capabilities of the product, specifically the ones that are deployed on an on-premises model, need to be improved."
"The solution could improve the EDR component in many areas, such as the zero-day and persistent threats. The implementation is also complex for this feature."
"Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses."
"One thing that I don't like is that McAfee products change very often and upgrade very often."
"They have to do something to make the solution more resilient or recoverable from power failure events, which may include creating their own database."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator should improve its integration with other tools."
"There is a problem when it comes to agent communication and duplicate records, where the rebooting of a machine leads to the installation of a new agent and you get a lot of duplicate records that ultimately affect your compliance monitoring."
"The way that ePolicy launches the updates is very slow. It would be great if that was faster."
"They have some areas that could be improved. For example, we also use this solution for email encryption, which was clunky and could be improved, but the email security itself has been excellent."
More Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix Cons →
More Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews while Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix is ranked 13th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG). McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0, while Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Useful agent communication, reliable, but lacking support for microservices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix writes "Inexpensive, with good email security, but the technical support could be improved". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler DLP, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, whereas Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP).
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.