ManageEngine OpManager vs Opmantek NMIS comparison

ManageEngine and Opmantek are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Opmantek is ranked #107. ManageEngine holds a 1.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to Opmantek’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Opmantek users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

5,639 Views
5,413 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Opmantek NMIS

Read 1 Opmantek NMIS review

615 Views
597 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Opmantek NMIS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and Opmantek NMIS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,855 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Opmantek NMIS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

107th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Opmantek NMIS is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.8%
Opmantek NMIS	0.3%
Other	97.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Charles A

Deputy Director at Access Healthcare Services Pvt Ltd

Reporting features improve operational efficiency while weekend support needs enhancement

Support is moderate and needs improvement, especially during weekends when technicians perform upgrades. During weekends, they need to provide more support to ensure a smooth transition. There is a call for ManageEngine OpManager to scale better in automation and AI functionality. Although the product stability is good, support enhancement is necessary to enable better planning for upgrades and maintenance activities.

Read full review

it_user855840

Systems Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Flexible device polling times and extensible modules are key features for me

There are lots of reasons why I'm using it. The installer itself is basically something that can be used as a no-questions-asked type of installer. I can use it with automation tools like Chef and Puppet. I don't have to answer some random questions. I can worry about all that stuff later on in the configuration. It allows for variable polling times of devices on the network. Because it's all in text, in general, that obviously makes it easier from the automation perspective as well, to modify configuration on the fly, using Puppet and those kind of tools. It does have different modules, so you can extend the solution as you need it, or get as little as you need in the beginning, so you don't have to buy a full set of modules. You just buy what you need and expand later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is scalable."

"The traffic monitoring and the traffic analysis are great."

"Managing platforms and network device virtualization on one platform is beneficial."

"The solution's network device monitoring is the most valuable feature."

"OpManager technical support is good."

"Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status."

"You can put all of your work on there, they'll send you an email or send you a text. That functionality as a network engineer is the one I like the most. I do like the fact that we can schedule reports. That works too because that's a lot fewer spreadsheets that I have to create."

"This is a good general monitoring system that has all the features we require and they constantly update with new capabilities."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"The big thing is the event management engine, which is really, really nice to use, and it comes at a reasonable price, unlike some of the competitors like Netcool from IBM. Those kinds of tools are hugely expensive and they come as resource-heavy types of solutions. This obviously doesn't require as much hardware, but it does offer similar benefits where you can manage all the events."

"I think it compares very well to all the solutions in what it offers, and also I think compared to some of them, it is much more reliable."

"In my case, I prefer to only poll interfaces that have descriptions, and the ones that don't have descriptions, I don't really want to know about them. It does allow for all these bits and pieces and adjustments, and fine tuning to get it to a point where it works for my needs."

"It does have different modules, so you can extend the solution as you need it, or get as little as you need in the beginning, so you don't have to buy a full set of modules. You just buy what you need and expand later on."

"The installer itself is basically something that can be used as a no-questions-asked type of installer. I can use it with automation tools like Chef and Puppet. I don't have to answer some random questions. I can worry about all that stuff later on in the configuration."

"It allows for variable polling times of devices on the network. Because it's all in text, in general, that obviously makes it easier from the automation perspective as well, to modify configuration on the fly, using Puppet and those kind of tools."

Cons

"I would like to see more capabilities and specific profiles built for the manufacturing sector."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view; when I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface and get confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint."

"However, it lacks strong local support."

"We get a lot of false alerts."

"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."

"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."

"Also, every time I perform a version upgrade, something breaks."

"Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"These kinds of solutions are more node- or device-based solutions. It would be nice in the future if they could be more data-oriented, so it would be easier for me to pull different stats based on ad-hoc requirements; but in a big, centralized database where I can pull specific things, and mix and match the way I want to."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"The product is not worth the money."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 11% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

Observium vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Opmantek NMIS

Compared 36% of the time

Nagios XI vs Opmantek NMIS

Compared 34% of the time

NetMon vs Opmantek NMIS

Compared 20% of the time

Zabbix vs Opmantek NMIS

Compared 11% of the time

More Opmantek NMIS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

April 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download Opmantek NMIS product report

Also Known As

OpManager

No data available

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Opmantek’s multi award winning network management and IT audit software helps IT teams detect faults, review current and historical network performance, and predict where future failures are likely to occur. Opmantek software is used by more than 115,000 organizations in 130 countries, and manages some of the world’s most complex IT environments including some of the world’s largest telecommunications carriers, managed service providers and banks. Every six minutes somewhere in the world, a new organization implements an Opmantek product.

Opmantek

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Telmex, John Deere, Three Network.

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.