Make vs OpenLegacy comparison

Make and OpenLegacy are both solutions in the AI Software Development category. Make is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while OpenLegacy is ranked #78. Make holds a 0.5% mindshare in ASD, compared to OpenLegacy’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Make users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenLegacy users who would recommend it.

Make

Read 18 Make reviews

4,089 Views
1,840 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OpenLegacy

Read 5 OpenLegacy reviews

2,320 Views
858 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Make

OpenLegacy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

OpenLegacy and Make compete in the technology integration space. OpenLegacy has an advantage in pricing and customization, while Make excels in its feature set valued by users.

Features: OpenLegacy's strengths include powerful API management, legacy integration for complex environments, and flexible solutions. Make offers extensive integration capabilities, a robust automation suite, and an easy-to-use drag-and-drop interface.

Room for Improvement: OpenLegacy could enhance its automation capabilities, improve the user interface for less technical users, and expand integration options. Make may benefit from reducing its initial setup complexity, offering clearer documentation for advanced features, and adapting its service for specific industry needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenLegacy features a simple deployment model and extensive support services which facilitate implementation. Make pairs efficient deployment with responsive customer service, often resolving issues quickly and enhancing the overall support experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenLegacy is competitively priced with a lower initial setup cost, delivering substantial ROI through effective legacy integrations. Make's higher setup cost is justified by its comprehensive feature set and efficiencies in automation, providing significant ROI despite the higher price point.

To learn more, read our detailed Make vs. OpenLegacy Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. OpenLegacy

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Make

Ranking in AI Software Development

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (6th)

OpenLegacy

Ranking in AI Software Development

78th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenLegacy is 0.4%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Make	0.5%
OpenLegacy	0.4%
Other	99.1%

AI Software Development

Featured Reviews

Dinesh Lavu

Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects

Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.

Read full review

reviewer1042905

VP, Chief Enterprise Integration Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The biggest advantage is how simple the technology was.

I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be. OpenLegacy handles the bread-and-butter TP monitoring stuff, but I am working for one of the six banks in the United States still using the Hogan mainframe, which has a slightly proprietary mechanism. But OpenLegacy currently doesn't have a connector for Hogan. So it would help if they could build one. That would appeal to financial institutions that still use Hogan, like US Bank, Wells Fargo, KeyBank, and Vanguard.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Make saves me roughly forty-five percent to sixty percent of time since the analysis part and solution are provided below the question."

"I am using Make for content creation, and it saves time in content creation for me and helps with tasks by creating content for me even without writing a single word."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing the number of hours that go into validating and verifying the flow of a particular repetitive process, which would otherwise take multiple hours, to just a few minutes to review for more than 1,000 or 2,000 case scenarios."

"This means the task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make."

"The new AI feature that Make has launched is really amazing."

"This has made a very positive impact on my life because initially I was not able to do things quickly and efficiently, but now with the help of Make, I can plan many things that help my work become efficient."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing our manual workflow and workload by almost twenty to thirty percent, which I feel is great."

More Make pros

"It is possible to solve larger legacy API issues on an enterprise level with this product."

"The biggest advantage of OpenLegacy was how simple the technology was, and we were able to build out the OpenLegacy parts very quickly, putting together a couple hundred APIs in six months."

"Using OpenLegacy, the exposure of services is far easier and quicker. In many cases, exposure of services requires just a few clicks and takes only minutes. In very complex cases, it still only takes half a day. Without OpenLegacy, it would take us several months to create the same services."

"OpenLegacy opens the door to connect modern web products to our old legacy system."

"OpenLegacy provides a way to go from the outside world to the legacy mainframe, to move the old standard application to a REST API application. New digital services can be created in a few clicks and this can be done easily by COBOL programmers."

"The product has helped our business by allowing us to become more efficient in data handling."

"The speed of development of production, especially in specific environments like IBM mainframes, has been valuable."

"Without OpenLegacy, it would take us several months to create the same services."

More OpenLegacy pros

Cons

"One area for improvement is an auto-building feature."

"Pricing is definitely something that is on a higher tier where we are consuming around 1.5 to 2 million operations per month, which makes the bill quite substantial."

"Actually, I did not finish this project with Make; I could not manage to finish the full workflow, and I decided to leave it as it is, implementing it a different way because it is very tricky."

"One area that needs improvement is the debugging and monitoring."

"I was talking about dark mode because it feels irritating when working in dark places."

"I feel that Make can be improved in terms of API handling and integrations."

"Make can enhance the credit limit for free use because what is happening now is that most of the credits have been used during testing only."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

More Make cons

"Debugging and logging for programmers could be better."

"We would also be more than happy if the product had the option to work in the opposite direction – the ability to consume REST/SOW services in the outer world from the mainframe."

"I would like to see SSL out-of-the-box. OpenLegacy certainly does SSL, but it was not the default for our use case. We are currently working with OpenLegacy to cross the SSL bridge and suspect that most users will want to do the same."

"The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

"Customer support for the product is slow and not very good. It makes using the product difficult if you need help quickly."

"I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

"The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Educational Organization

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Construction Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Make

Compared 13% of the time

Pega Platform vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Zapier vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Make

Compared 10% of the time

More Make Competitors

IBM DataPower Gateway vs OpenLegacy

Compared 18% of the time

Pipedream vs OpenLegacy

Compared 11% of the time

IBM API Connect vs OpenLegacy

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs OpenLegacy

Compared 8% of the time

Fiorano API Management vs OpenLegacy

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenLegacy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Make

August 2026

Download Make product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenLegacy

August 2026

Download OpenLegacy product report

Also Known As

Integromat

No data available

Overview

Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.

What features does Make offer?

Visual Workflow Builder: Create and edit workflows effortlessly with a friendly interface.
App Integration: Supports numerous apps, enabling diverse connections.
Real-Time Monitoring: Track workflow executions with precise analytics.
Conditional Logic: Implement logic paths for smarter automations.

What benefits can users expect from Make?

Increased Efficiency: Automating tasks reduces manual intervention, saving time.
Cost Reduction: Lower operational costs with streamlined processes.
Scalable Solutions: Easily adjust workflows to meet growing business demands.
Enhanced Productivity: Focus on high-priority tasks with automated operations.

In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.

Make

OpenLegacy integrates legacy customer data with REST APIs, speeding up mobile transactions and code updates while simplifying API development. Its open-source platform offers flexibility, benefiting mainframe environments and Tomcat server deployments.

OpenLegacy is crucial for organizations aiming to integrate modern web applications with legacy systems. The platform is widely used in financial and logistics sectors to enable quick access to customer data and transactions, effectively monetizing mainframe assets. By facilitating the rapid creation of numerous APIs, OpenLegacy supports seamless interactions between applications, allowing modern web form inputs into legacy systems. Its flexibility and extensive capabilities simplify API development and deployment, proving valuable for those managing day-to-day banking and transaction data. However, room for improvement includes better debugging, logging, SSL integration, flexible pricing options, and support availability, especially for Hogan mainframe users.

What features define OpenLegacy?

REST API Integration: Facilitates integration with mobile transactions.
Faster Code Updates: Delivers efficiency in code changes for mainframe environments.
Open-Source Flexibility: Offers customization and broad capabilities.
Tomcat Deployment: Supports straightforward deployment via Tomcat servers.
Rapid API Development: Enables swift creation of multiple APIs.

What ROI benefits should users expect?

Legacy System Monetization: Transforms mainframe assets into profit.
Improved Integration: Enhances access to critical customer data and transactions.
Efficient Operations: Streamlines daily banking and transaction management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Flexibility and open-source nature reduce expenses.
Enhanced Interoperability: Allows seamless interaction between old and new applications.

Financial and logistics companies leverage OpenLegacy to link web applications with legacy systems, ensuring quick customer data and transaction access. This integration supports rapid solution building and efficient management of banking and transaction data, particularly benefiting institutions like US Bank and Wells Fargo needing comprehensive Hogan mainframe connectors.

OpenLegacy

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia

Many of openLegacy's global customers are among the Global 100 companies. Review case studies in these industries: Agriculture, Airport Authority, Automotive, Auto, Finance, Insurance, Government, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Retailwww.openlegacy.com/case-studie...

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. OpenLegacy

June 2026

Free Report: Make vs. OpenLegacy

Find out what your peers are saying about Make vs. OpenLegacy and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Make vs. OpenLegacy report.

See our list of best AI Software Development vendors.

We monitor all AI Software Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.