Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LogRhythm NetMon vs TruView comparison

LogRhythm and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. LogRhythm is ranked #56 with an average rating of 7.7, while NETSCOUT is ranked #68 with an average rating of 6.5. LogRhythm holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.
LogRhythm NetMon
Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews
  • 564 Views
  • 266 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
TruView
Read 17 TruView reviews
  • 374 Views
  • 133 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

TruView and LogRhythm NetMon are competing in the network performance monitoring space. TruView stands out with its cost-effectiveness and customer satisfaction in support, while LogRhythm NetMon excels with its advanced features that justify a higher cost.

Features: TruView comes with a streamlined interface, real-time traffic analysis, and comprehensive monitoring dashboards. LogRhythm NetMon provides robust threat detection, extensive network forensic analysis, and advanced security functionalities.

Room for Improvement: TruView could enhance its security features, offer deeper forensic analysis, and broaden its threat detection capabilities. LogRhythm NetMon might benefit from simplifying its interface, reducing deployment complexity, and improving user accessibility for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TruView offers an intuitive setup process and strong customer support that facilitates quick deployment. LogRhythm NetMon's deployment is more complex due to its advanced capabilities but provides extensive training and documentation to overcome challenges, along with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: TruView is cost-effective, featuring a lower initial setup cost and significant ROI through efficient network monitoring. LogRhythm NetMon involves a higher upfront investment, offering ROI via enhanced security measures and comprehensive data analysis capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. TruView Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm NetMon vs. TruView
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
56th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TruView
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
68th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

KeithGalleros - PeerSpot reviewer
A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient
The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.
Read full review
MM
Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network
We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."
"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"
"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."
"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."
"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."
"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."
More LogRhythm NetMon pros
"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
 

Cons

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."
"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."
"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."
"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."
"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."
"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."
"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."
"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."
More LogRhythm NetMon cons
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."
"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."
"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."
"The product is expensive for smaller companies."
"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."
"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
20%
Government
11%
Insurance Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
19%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?
It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?
I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.
See all answers
What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?
The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for ea...
See all answers
What do you like most about TruView?
The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TruView?
There are certain licensing costs. For example, if you use NetFlow, you need to purchase a license depending on the size of your connector. Similarly, for voice monitoring, you need a separate lice...
See all answers
What needs improvement with TruView?
We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 31% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 21% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 17% of the time
Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 17% of the time
Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon Logo
Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon
Compared 15% of the time
More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm NetMon
June 2025
LogRhythm NetMon reportDownload LogRhythm NetMon product report
Buyer's Guide
TruView
May 2025
TruView reportDownload TruView product report
 

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor
No data available
 

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

Visual TruView by Fluke Networks is a unified solution for Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM). TruView embeds the most important data sources such as packet, transaction, NetFlow/IPFIX, and SNMP to present analytics in a time-correlated single dashboard view. These correlated views help you quickly see how well the infrastructure is transporting applications and how well those applications are performing in the context of end-user experience. And, TruView’s integrated 10 Gbps full line rate stream-to-disk packet capture ensures you’ll never miss an important event again.

NETSCOUT
 

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn
FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.
Buyer's Guide
LogRhythm NetMon vs. TruView
June 2025
Free Report: LogRhythm NetMon vs. TruView
Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our LogRhythm NetMon vs. TruView report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.