LiveAction LiveNX vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant comparison

BlueCat and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. BlueCat is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.8, while Juniper is ranked #50 with an average rating of 9.0. BlueCat holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 10 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

1,755 Views
1,281 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

364 Views
291 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

```html

LiveAction LiveNX and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in the network management category. Marvis appears to have an upper hand in advanced optimization and intelligent analytics, while LiveAction LiveNX provides cost-effective management and strong customer support.

Features: LiveAction LiveNX offers network visualization, effective traffic analysis, and robust customer insights, which support comprehensive monitoring. Marvis features AI-driven troubleshooting, proactive network assurance, and intelligent analytics for advanced use cases.

Room for Improvement: LiveAction LiveNX could enhance AI capabilities, expand on automation features, and improve scalability options. Marvis may work on reducing complexity, lowering initial costs, and offering more flexible support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveAction LiveNX is known for easy deployment and responsive support, enabling smooth system integration. Marvis offers an intuitive setup and proactive technical assistance for a seamless transition.

Pricing and ROI: LiveAction LiveNX provides competitive pricing and strong ROI, suitable for cost-centric companies. Marvis, with a higher upfront cost, promises long-term savings through enhanced efficiency.

```

To learn more, read our detailed LiveAction LiveNX vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (31st)

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

50th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at a transportation company with 11-50 employees

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"LiveAction LiveNX provides valuable real-time and historical network traffic visualization capabilities that help monitor and analyze network performance."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

More LiveAction LiveNX pros

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

Cons

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"Maintenance is required for the system."

More LiveAction LiveNX cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"It's very expensive."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

22%

Retailer

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 18% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 15% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 10% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 35% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 30% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 21% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 14% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

August 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Also Known As

LiveNX

No data available

Overview

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

July 2025

Free Report: LiveAction LiveNX vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAction LiveNX vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LiveAction LiveNX vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.