Layer7 API Management and Postman Enterprise compete in the API management sector. Postman Enterprise has the upper hand in ease of use and automation capabilities, whereas Layer7 API Management stands out with its robust security and integration features.
Features: Layer7 API Management provides strong security features like protocol translation and token support, crucial for mobile-first strategies. It excels in integration capabilities praised for flexibility and scalability. Postman Enterprise is noted for ease of use, automation capabilities, and comprehensive testing features. Its intuitive workspace and collection features are highly appreciated by teams focused on API testing and collaboration.
Room for Improvement: Layer7 API Management needs improvement in developer portal user experience and integration capabilities. Enhanced training resources and streamlined token support are also suggested. Postman Enterprise lacks better support for SOAP APIs, enhanced reporting features, and improvements in user interface simplicity, as pointed out by users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Layer7 API Management is mainly deployed on-premises and in hybrid cloud environments, with positive feedback on support responsiveness but concerns over consistency post-Broadcom acquisition. Postman Enterprise offers flexible deployment across public and hybrid clouds, with generally helpful and responsive customer support. Both have strong support teams but differ in deployment preferences.
Pricing and ROI: Layer7 API Management is considered a pricier option with complex licensing models, suitable for large enterprises with extensive security needs. Its ROI is seen as challenging to quantify beyond security benefits. Postman Enterprise has a widely-used free version, with paid tiers seen as cost-effective, offering favorable ROI perceptions among development teams.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
Technical support is excellent, and I would rate them as ten.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
All nodes communicate with one primary database, affecting connections and causing crashes under high load.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
Without rebooting for ninety to one hundred eighty days, cache builds up in Linux boxes, causing memory utilization issues.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
Seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Postman Enterprise | 1.5% |
| Layer7 API Management | 2.3% |
| Other | 96.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 84 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.
It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.
With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
