Kiteworks vs TIBCO Managed File Transfer comparison

Kiteworks and TIBCO are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Kiteworks is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while TIBCO is ranked #18. Kiteworks holds a 6.5% mindshare in MFT, compared to TIBCO’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

2,947 Views
1,768 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Read 3 TIBCO Managed File Transfer reviews

523 Views
518 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Kiteworks and TIBCO Managed File Transfer are competing products in the sphere of secured file transfer and management solutions. TIBCO Managed File Transfer often takes the upper hand due to its more comprehensive features, although Kiteworks is more favorable in terms of pricing and support.

Features: Kiteworks emphasizes data security, compliance capabilities, and tracking while TIBCO Managed File Transfer is notable for its integration flexibility, scalability, and robust transaction management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks is recognized for straightforward deployment, enhanced by a user-friendly design and responsive customer service. TIBCO Managed File Transfer has a more complex deployment due to its advanced features but compensates with thorough onboarding assistance and detailed documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks offers competitive initial setup costs and favorable ROI due to lower ongoing expenditure. TIBCO Managed File Transfer, while more costly upfront, promises high ROI through its advanced capabilities supporting large-scale, complex operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Email Security (29th), Content Collaboration Platforms (13th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (10th)

TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 6.5%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Managed File Transfer is 2.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kiteworks	6.5%
TIBCO Managed File Transfer	2.3%
Other	91.2%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Joshua Rule

Senior Integration Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Serves as a straightforward SFTP server that offers reasonably good support

I think some of the automated deployment features could use some assistance, which is an area where it currently lacks. The product needs some ability to help it with the deployment model, which is a little difficult. Some support for the area revolving around PGP protocols in the product would be helpful. I think TIBCO could try to integrate better with API management software. TIBCO is a fairly solid product, but integration with some API management software should provide a better selling point since TIBCO would have some great API management capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"We can see when people are sending things. We can definitely see who is sending to whom. From the administrative logs, we can see who is sending to an outside entity, and those logs are retained for quite a while."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

More Kiteworks pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to do centralized administration."

"They have great multi-factor authentication for extra security."

"TIBCO has its own integration tool."

Cons

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

More Kiteworks cons

"I think some of the automated deployment features could use some assistance, which is an area where it currently lacks. The product needs some ability to help it with the deployment model, which is a little difficult."

"Their cloud product is not yet stable."

"The UI could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"The price is very good for the complexity that the tool provides."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

28%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 18% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 10% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 9% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Box vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

GoAnywhere MFT vs TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Compared 28% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Compared 26% of the time

MOVEit vs TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Compared 12% of the time

Control-M vs TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Compared 11% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Compared 9% of the time

More TIBCO Managed File Transfer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

December 2025

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

December 2025

Download TIBCO Managed File Transfer product report

Also Known As

Accellion

No data available

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

TIBCO MFT Platform Server enables an organization to control activities and securely transfer files on all major platforms throughout the enterprise. TIBCO MFT Platform Server is a solution for the following reasons: It supports all major platforms including Windows, UNIX (AIX, HP-UX, Solaris), Linux, z/Linux, iSeries, and IBM Mainframe. It offers a full range of encryption algorithms and built-in security and authentication options to secure any file transfer. It automates the process of file transfers and provides scheduling options and event-driven capabilities. With the TIBCO Accelerator acceleration technology, it makes the file transfers up to 30 times faster than FTP and other legacy systems.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Endesa/Enel Group, Symantec, Visma Connect

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer

December 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.