We performed a comparison between Kaseya VSA and Scalefusion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the Live Connect module provided by Kaseya. It is a powerful module. I also like the Agent Procedure module. We work with it most of the time."
"We can schedule the patching of the endpoints."
"The most valuable features of Kaseya VSA are remote control, live connect, and automation."
"The training that we received was quite good."
"Kesaya is highly configurable."
"This solution is our RMM tool and we love the deployment features."
"Patch management was very useful. Backdoor access to the clients was also very useful."
"The most valuable part of this solution is the security features that it offers."
"Scalefusion is easy to use, and they have a broad knowledge base, so you can quickly find answers if you're unsure how to do something. The articles on the knowledge base are well-written, with clear steps on what to do for a specific scenario. That part is well documented."
"We actually upgraded the solution due to the fact that we needed the support for Apple devices. We haven't had a chance to test that part of the product just yet, however, that was our biggest criticism of the product prior to this most recent update."
"The stability of the solution is good but it can be improved."
"If you compare with other products, Manage Engine has some features that we like but are not present in Kaseya."
"Its scripting language kind of sucked. They have their own version of PowerShell inside VSA. if you want to reach out and grab endpoint information, for instance, to know how many end devices have a program installed, you actually have to write a script for that. It wasn't like how it is in CrowdStrike where you can just do a search, and it just happened. In VSA, you have to write your own script to do it. In terms of new features, an integrated MDM for mobile devices would be awesome."
"There is room for improvement in the remote control strengths."
"Sometimes, the product misinterprets the functionality of a machine."
"The reporting feature in Kaseya VSA could improve by being more user-friendly. The reporting overview is too wordy or the representation can be better."
"It's very difficult to update the third-party software on every device."
"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough."
Kaseya VSA is ranked 4th in Patch Management with 29 reviews while Scalefusion is ranked 19th in Patch Management with 2 reviews. Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6, while Scalefusion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Single portal management, cost-saving, with thorough technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Scalefusion writes "An MDM solution for controlling and restricting data on devices". Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Datto Remote Monitoring and Management, whereas Scalefusion is most compared with SOTI MobiControl, VMware Workspace ONE, JumpCloud and Microsoft Intune. See our Kaseya VSA vs. Scalefusion report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
