Ranorex Studio vs k6 Open Source comparison

k6 and Ranorex are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. k6 is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5, while Ranorex is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5. k6 holds a 0.5% mindshare in RTT, compared to Ranorex’s 8.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of k6 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

k6 Open Source

Read 2 k6 Open Source reviews

94 Views
10 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,213 Views
385 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

k6 Open Source

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

k6 Open Source and Ranorex Studio compete in the testing tools category, with Ranorex Studio appearing to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, which many consider worth the investment despite k6’s favorable pricing.

Features: k6 Open Source is valued for high-load testing with an intuitive scripting interface, effective performance testing, and scalability. Ranorex Studio offers robust GUI testing automation, drag-and-drop functionality, and supports a wide range of applications cross-platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio offers an integrated deployment experience with extensive training and documentation support. k6 Open Source is easier to deploy for speed and flexibility but provides limited direct support. Ranorex Studio appeals to enterprises needing structured assistance.

Pricing and ROI: k6 Open Source has minimal setup cost due to being open-source, making it budget-friendly. Ranorex Studio requires a higher initial investment but often yields greater ROI in automated testing due to advanced features leading to efficient processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Ranorex Studio vs. k6 Open Source Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. k6 Open Source

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

k6 Open Source

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (8th)

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (15th), Mobile App Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Regression Testing Tools category, the mindshare of k6 Open Source is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 8.1%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Regression Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

NalinGoonawardana

Principal Consultant ( Test automation - Performance testing) at TTC Global (TTC) at TTC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services

One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code approach, could make it more accessible to a broader audience. It would be beneficial to strike a balance where basic tasks can be performed graphically through a user-friendly interface, while still allowing the flexibility for more complex operations through code, similar to how JMeter operates. This could enhance the user experience and make k6 more approachable for those who may not be as comfortable with scripting.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

"The solution is stable."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"Object identification is good."

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Media Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about k6 Open Source?

The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?

k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs k6 Open Source

Compared 50% of the time

Apache JMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

BlazeMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs k6 Open Source

Compared 9% of the time

More k6 Open Source Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

June 2025

Download k6 Open Source product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

June 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Also Known As

Load Impact

No data available

Overview

Load Impact offers three main features:

Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. k6 Open Source

June 2025

Free Report: Ranorex Studio vs. k6 Open Source

Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. k6 Open Source and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ranorex Studio vs. k6 Open Source report.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.