• Home
  • JupiterOne vs. Noetic

JupiterOne vs Noetic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
JupiterOne Logo
JupiterOne
Read 1 JupiterOne review
876 views|606 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Noetic Cyber Logo
Noetic
133 views|60 comparisons
Featured Review
Prakhar Pandey
An user friendly solution for writing queries with intuitive flow
Use Noetic?
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about JupiterOne?
Top Answer:The product’s UI is pretty decent and fast.
What needs improvement with JupiterOne?
Top Answer:There should be more integration or an update to the visualization part of the charts or other graphs we plot. Currently, it integrates from your local directive with your local PC. If it is… more »
What is your primary use case for JupiterOne?
Top Answer:We use the solution for writing all the queries. There is a lot of variation for machine learning projects like data processing, data analysis, and pipeline creation. It has the flexibility to work on… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
out of 18 in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
Views
876
Comparisons
606
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
421
Rating
8.0
8th
out of 18 in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
Views
133
Comparisons
60
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
JupiterOne
Noetic Cyber
Overview

Cyber Asset Context Is Security.
Secure your enterprise via cyber asset management. Rapidly add context to your cloud security, compliance, IAM, vulnerability management processes and more. Answer the questions that matter with JupiterOne’s cloud-native cyber asset management platform.

Noetic provides a proactive approach to cyber asset and controls management, empowering security teams to see, understand, and optimize their cybersecurity posture.
We help security teams better understand cyber risks to their environment by building a map of the relationship between all of their assets and entities, with context and insights to make faster, more accurate decisions.

Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company22%
University9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Retailer7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available

JupiterOne is ranked 2nd in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) with 1 review while Noetic is ranked 8th in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM). JupiterOne is rated 8.0, while Noetic is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of JupiterOne writes "An user friendly solution for writing queries with intuitive flow ". On the other hand, JupiterOne is most compared with Axonius and Wiz, whereas Noetic is most compared with Axonius.

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.