Red Hat OpenShift vs Virtuozzo Application Platform comparison

Red Hat and Virtuozzo are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Virtuozzo is ranked #21. Red Hat holds a 11.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to Virtuozzo’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtuozzo users who would recommend it.

Red Hat OpenShift

Read 62 Red Hat OpenShift reviews

10,841 Views
7,263 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Read 7 Virtuozzo Application Platform reviews

687 Views
508 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Virtuozzo Application Platform and Red Hat OpenShift are key competitors in the cloud application platform sector. Red Hat OpenShift is seen as the leading product due to its comprehensive features and strong enterprise capabilities.

Features:Virtuozzo Application Platform is known for lightweight virtualization, easy scaling options, and straightforward deployment processes, making it appealing for simpler use cases. Red Hat OpenShift features extensive container orchestration, integrated developer tools, and robust security, addressing complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement:Virtuozzo could improve its advanced orchestration capabilities, developer tool integration, and security features to compete more effectively with its rivals. Red Hat OpenShift could streamline its deployment process, enhance pricing transparency, and simplify its feature-rich interface for easier adoption by smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Virtuozzo Application Platform is praised for quick and hassle-free deployment, appealing to those seeking ease of use. Red Hat OpenShift, while more complex to deploy, offers superior support services and comprehensive documentation for troubleshooting and guidance.

Pricing and ROI:Virtuozzo Application Platform is recognized for lower setup costs and quicker ROI, making it ideal for cost-sensitive businesses. Red Hat OpenShift, despite its higher initial investment, provides significant ROI for large-scale enterprises due to its advanced capabilities and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat OpenShift vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Virtualization Software (11th), Container Management (12th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (6th), Agile and DevOps Services (1st)

Virtuozzo Application Platform

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 11.8%, up from 11.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtuozzo Application Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat OpenShift	11.8%
Virtuozzo Application Platform	0.8%
Other	87.4%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Pratul Shukla

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Adopting a flexible and efficient approach with noticeable improvements in operational costs and continued challenges in job management

Currently, one of the biggest challenges we face is with services and jobs. For spawning batches, although it has crons, it is not easy to integrate with enterprise systems such as Autosys. The entire company uses Autosys, but we are not able to integrate it effectively. We need intermediate servers to run OC utility commands and initiate the cron job. We have to do a lot of modifications to ensure our batches work properly. With physical or virtual servers, even in AWS, we are able to write and manage multiple jobs. Managing batches in Red Hat OpenShift has been a significant challenge. Integrating third parties is a challenge with Red Hat OpenShift. For example, with Elasticsearch, onboarding itself was difficult, running file beats and dealing with routing issues. It is not straightforward, especially since we have some components in AWS as. AWS has many capabilities that come out of the box and are easier to work with compared to Red Hat OpenShift. Red Hat OpenShift's biggest disadvantage is they do not provide any private cloud setup where we can host on our site using their services. The main reason we went with Red Hat OpenShift was because it is a private cloud, and we have regulatory requirements that prevent us from using public cloud.

Read full review

Miguel Maloney Thompson

IC Director at a printing company with 11-50 employees

A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup

It is a scalable solution. I have yet to have a scenario regarding automatic scale and if there's an increase in resource requirement or need. We have yet to have that scenario. We have yet to test that. The scalability was more than manually adjusting and increasing whatever I had to do. I rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of OpenShift is the containers."

"Two stand-out features are the security model and value-add features that don't exist in Upstream Kubernetes."

"OpenShift is based on Kubernetes and we try to use all the Kubernetes objects of OpenShift. We don't use features that are specific to OpenShift, except internal certificates for the services. The one feature that is missing from Kubernetes and that is really useful in OpenShift is the lifecycle of the cluster and the ease of installation. We use VMware and VMware integration internally with the OpenShift installer, which is very good. With OpenShift it's easy to spin up or scale out a cluster."

"Self-provisioning support saves a lot of time and unnecessary work from the system administrator who can use this time to run and monitor the infrastructure. For the developer, this means less time waiting for the provisioning and excellent flexibility for development, testing, and production. Also, in such systems it is easy for developers to monitor applications even after deployment."

"The security features of OpenShift are strong when in use of role-based access."

"We are currently dealing with both local support and Red Hat support, and they have been amazing."

"Valuable features include auto-recreate of pod if pod fails; fast rollback, with one click, to previous version."

"The most valuable feature of OpenShift is the security context constraint (SCC). The solution’s security throughout the stack is good. And security context constraints provide port-level security. It's a granular level of control, where you can give privileges to certain users to work on certain applications."

More Red Hat OpenShift pros

"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."

"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."

"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."

"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."

"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."

Cons

"One of the features that I've observed in Tanzu Mission Control is that I can manage multiple Kubernetes environments. For instance, one of my lines of business is using OpenShift OKD; another one wants to use Google Anthos, and somebody else wants to use VMware Tanzu. If I have to manage all these, Tanzu Mission Control is giving me the opportunity to completely manage all of my Kubernetes clusters, whereas, with OpenShift, I can only manage a particular area. I can't manage other Kubernetes clusters. I would like to have the option to manage all Kubernetes clusters with OpenShift."

"The GUI could have more capabilities, particularly around virtualization."

"OpenShift's storage management could be better."

"Not a ten because it's not a standard solution and the endpoint protection user has to prepare with documentation or have training from other people. It's not easy to start because it's not like other solutions."

"The GUI could have more capabilities, particularly around virtualization. Some features are missing, such as storage migrations, when compared with VMware."

"One area for improvement is the documentation. They need to make it a little bit more user-friendly. Also, if you compare certain features and the installation process with Rancher, Rancher is simpler."

"I had to frequently upgrade my cluster due to OpenShift's rolling updates every six months, which I found to be excessive."

"My team has found some bugs in OpenShift due to continuous integration, and this is an area for improvement in the platform. RedHat should fix the bugs. Another area for improvement in OpenShift is that upgrading clusters can be challenging, resulting in downtime. Application support also needs improvement in OpenShift because the platform doesn't support all applications in the cloud. I'd like upgraded storage in the next release of OpenShift, especially when I need to do a DR exercise. It would also be good if the platform allows mirroring with another cluster, or more portability in terms of moving applications to another cluster."

More Red Hat OpenShift cons

"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."

"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."

"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."

"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."

"The backup functionality needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the license-free version of Red Hat Openshift but we pay for the support."

"The cost is quite high."

"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."

"My company makes payments towards the licensing costs attached to OpenShift."

"We had a Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) license for all our servers' operating systems. By having multiple Red Hat products together, you can negotiate costs and leverage on having a sort of enterprise license agreement to reduce the overall outlay or TCO."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"The pricing for OpenShift includes support and licensing, which costs approximately $400."

"The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

More Red Hat OpenShift pricing and cost advice

"Pricing for providers is revenue-shared based. Providers should invest in hardware to set up the Jelastic cluster."

"I would rate the cost 3 out of 5. There are additional costs other than licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	40

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift?

OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

Proxmox VE vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 6% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Salesforce Platform vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Heroku vs Virtuozzo Application Platform

Compared 15% of the time

More Virtuozzo Application Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift

August 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

August 2025

Download Virtuozzo Application Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Jelastic

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift offers a robust, scalable platform with strong security and automation, suitable for container orchestration, application deployment, and microservices architecture.

Designed to modernize applications by transitioning from legacy systems to cloud-native environments, Red Hat OpenShift provides powerful CI/CD integration and Kubernetes compatibility. Its security features, multi-cloud support, and source-to-image functionality enhance deployment flexibility. While the GUI offers user-friendly navigation, users benefit from its cloud-agnostic nature and efficient lifecycle management. However, improvements are needed in documentation, configuration complexity, and integration with third-party platforms. Pricing and high resource demands can also be challenging for wider adoption.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift?

Security: Comprehensive security features ensure safe deployments and operations.
Scalability: Auto-scaling and monitoring capabilities cater to high-demand environments.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration for efficient continuous deployment processes.
Cloud Compatibility: Supports multi-cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
GUI: Simplifies platform management and enhances usability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations reduce time and resource investments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapt quickly to changing demands and environments.
Quick Deployment: Fast application deployment supports agile project timelines.
Robust Support: Access to dependable customer support services.

Red Hat OpenShift is strategically implemented for diverse industries focusing on container orchestration and application modernization. Organizations leverage it for migrating applications to cloud-native environments and managing CI/CD pipelines. Its functionality facilitates efficient resource management and microservices architecture adoption, supporting enterprise-level DevOps practices. Users employ it across cloud and on-premises platforms to drive performance improvements.

Red Hat

Your Platform as a Service solution for DevOps hosting!

An elastic, high performance PaaS solution for cloud and hosting providers. The easy way to sell cloud hosting to DevOps-focused SaaS companies.

Turnkey application hosting for DevOps.

Sell PaaS alongside your existing products. The Virtuozzo Application Platform runs on the infrastructure you have today – even virtualized in your cloud or hosting platform.

It makes DevOps hosting fast, easy and cost-effective – and with true consumption-based billing, it gives you a real competitive advantage over hyperscale clouds.

Platform as a Service opens up new markets for your business: you can sell hosting to any company that depends on DevOps for internal or customer-facing IT.

Virtuozzo

Sample Customers

UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton

Hosting Providers: Hidora, Elastx, eApps, SaveInCloud, Infomaniak, Layershift, Valtti, Dogado, Locaweb, Planeetta, dogado, ServInt, Hostnet, Info.nl, Innofield, Lunacloud, Reg.ru, Websolute Private Cloud and Integrators: Joe's Datacenter, Croc, Ciklum, Vergence, Centerprise, GMV Soluciones

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

September 2025

Free Report: Red Hat OpenShift vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat OpenShift vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat OpenShift vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.