Infor LX vs Microsoft Dynamics SL comparison

Infor and Microsoft are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Infor holds a 1.3% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Infor LX

Read 8 Infor LX reviews

927 Views
890 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics SL

Read 3 Microsoft Dynamics SL reviews

298 Views
280 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infor LX

Microsoft Dynamics SL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics SL and Infor LX compete in the ERP solutions category, targeting organizations with specific industry needs. While Microsoft Dynamics SL shows strength in customer satisfaction regarding pricing and support, Infor LX appears superior in comprehensive features and perceived value.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics SL excels in project management, financial accounting, and offers extensive integration with Microsoft tools. Infor LX offers robust manufacturing and distribution features, provides extensive functionality for complex operations, and includes more industry-specific capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics SL supports hybrid deployment and benefits from integration capabilities with other Microsoft services. Infor LX focuses on cloud-based deployment, offering strong support for manufacturing environments. Microsoft Dynamics SL provides more flexibility in deployment models but Infor LX offers efficient cloud services suitable for scalable operations.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics SL is known for its cost-effectiveness and clear pricing structure, often leading to quicker ROI. Infor LX, while possibly requiring a higher initial investment, delivers extensive functionality that provides a significant ROI over time. Despite more favorable immediate pricing for Microsoft Dynamics SL, Infor LX is considered valuable for organizations needing advanced capabilities with long-term returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor LX vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor LX

Ranking in ERP

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Dynamics SL

Ranking in ERP

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LX is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics SL is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Infor LX	1.3%
Microsoft Dynamics SL	0.5%
Other	98.2%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Eugenio Santos

IT and processes re-engineering manager at DEUTZ AG

Program adapts to our requirements and handles our operations effectively

The interface we use currently needs enhancement, as I am still using the outdated green screens. I would benefit for us to adpot the latest INFOR user interface, which is a more integrated interface. Additionally, improvements in warehouse handling with handheld terminal, quality management in warehouses, and managing a dual sourcing strategy would be beneficial. I have had to build my own applications for some features that are lacking, and aligning all components for uncertainty management in the market is necessary.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Simplify and streamline complex business processes, and good integration capabilities but lacks predictive capabilities

An area of improvement could be around automation and predictability. However, I'm sure Microsoft is already thinking about incorporating AI co-pilot features, which should be coming soon. The end person who will be looking at the report is the CFO, and CFO isn't just interested in static reports but in predictive information. Ideally, SL could use data from ERP, and CRM to provide some level of prediction. CoPilot is plugged into Dynamics, it'll be a plus and even a huge selling point over other solutions that are there in the market because now we have a component of AI. We can also give you some level of prediction. Even if it starts with a 15% confidence level, a CFO will take that because it still allows them to increase their bets to a certain extent. So, that's something that I I will look forward to whenever Microsoft introduces it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've been using it since December 2009, and it has been absolutely stable till now."

"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

"Infor LX is effective for planning, manufacturing, and distribution processes."

"Infor LX's most valuable feature is that it's very interactive."

"The most important feature of Infor LX for me is the use of models for accounting, which create effects in different layers simultaneously."

"One of the major advantages of Infor LX is the stability of the program."

"The most valuable features are the exit points that enable integration with external software."

"One of the major advantages of Infor LX is the stability of the program."

More Infor LX pros

"The solution has provided a good return on investment by ensuring our financial and operational information is accurate and timely."

"It's pretty easy to set up."

"If I put myself in the customer's shoes, it's easier to use. Reporting would be a very valuable feature."

Cons

"Infor needs more APIs, as in the current version, APIs are not fully developed. The development of APIs must be enhanced, especially for AS400."

"Infor needs more APIs, as in the current version, APIs are not fully developed."

"It lacks in finance and administration, especially related to Italian accounting."

"The user interface of Infor LX needs significant enhancement to be more user-friendly."

"The connectors, performance, and knowledgebase availability can be improved."

"The interface needs enhancement, as I am still using outdated screens. I would benefit from a more integrated interface."

"It's based on AS/400 or Power i, a robust technology and platform. However, it is harder to manage admin most of the time."

"The interface needs enhancement, as I am still using outdated screens."

More Infor LX cons

"The licensing of the solution should be adjusted. The policies aren't ideal. They should make it easier to understand. Right now, it's too confusing."

"The product's primary improvement area would be its batch processing system."

"An area of improvement could be around automation and predictability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our last maintenance fee was around $15,000 a year for 33 current users."

"Pricing is variable due to different deals and discounts, typically starting at around $2000 US dollars for one license."

"Infor LX is not cheap but much cheaper compared to SAP HANA."

"The licensing costs were reasonable."

"If the value proposition is clear for the customer, they won't see it as an expensive solution. A solution becomes expensive when it doesn't do what it promises."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor LX?

What I would like to see improved in Infor LX is the licensing for the source codes, which I have already discussed with support and the marketing team. It is important for us to have the availabil...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor LX?

I have been working with Infor LX since 1996, which amounts to more than 20 years of experience. The main use cases for Infor LX include Enterprise Resource Planning: planning, production planning,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LX?

I purchased five licenses recently. Maybe the cost can be considered expensive on a tight budget, but I do not perceive the global cost of Infor LX to be high, especially when compared to other ERP...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Dynamics SL?

If I put myself in the customer's shoes, it's easier to use. Reporting would be a very valuable feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics SL?

The product's primary improvement area would be its batch processing system. Transitioning to a transactional processing system would significantly enhance its efficiency and usability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics SL?

Our primary use case for the platform was managing our financial and operational processes across multiple companies. We are a group with 11 to 12 companies, and Dynamics SL has been integral in ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

Infor LN vs Infor LX

Compared 50% of the time

SAP ERP vs Infor LX

Compared 24% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Infor LX

Compared 12% of the time

Infor M3 vs Infor LX

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Business ByDesign vs Infor LX

Compared 6% of the time

More Infor LX Competitors

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics SL

Compared 37% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Microsoft Dynamics SL

Compared 21% of the time

JD Edwards World vs Microsoft Dynamics SL

Compared 21% of the time

Anaplan vs Microsoft Dynamics SL

Compared 21% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics SL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX

September 2025

Download Infor LX product report

Buyer's Guide

ERP

October 2025

Download Microsoft Dynamics SL product report

Also Known As

Infor ERP LX, ERP LX

Dynamics SL, MS Dynamics SL

Overview

Infor LX is a comprehensive process manufacturing system that covers various manufacturing methods, including made to stock, made to order, configure to order, assemble to order, batch, repetitive, flow, and Lean manufacturing. A wide range of industries—including consumer packaged goods, food and beverage, life sciences, medical devices, chemicals, automotive, and general manufacturing—trust Infor LX to improve performance and profit margins at a lower total cost than comparable solutions.

Infor

Project management, job costing, materials management, service call entry, receiving, billing, and sales solution.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Shaklee Corporation, Clover Dairy, Cremer, Group Dekko

ASAP, Espartec, S.A de C.V., TGLT, Calder‹n Autopartes El_ctricas, GGS Systems, CLEAResult, Shared Spectrum Company, Scope Global Pty Ltd

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL

September 2025

Free Report: Infor LX vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LX vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor LX vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.