We performed a comparison between Inflectra Rapise and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"The whole suite is made for .NET development."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"The documentation is limited."
"Its UI could be better."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Inflectra Rapise is ranked 22nd in Test Automation Tools with 7 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Inflectra Rapise is rated 7.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
