Inflectra Rapise vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."

"The performance of Visual Studio Test Professional is valuable."

"One of the best documentation in the world."

"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."

"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."

"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."

"This product is a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"The product must provide more integration."

"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."

"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."

"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."

"There are not any specific areas for improvement since there are so many libraries and frameworks already available."

"The price could be improved."

"Its UI could be better."

"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."

"We pay for the solution annually and the price could be reduced."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."

"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."

"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."

"The pricing is expensive."

"The product is very expensive."

"There are two versions of Visual Studio Test Professional: Community and Professional. We are currently using the Community version, but if we start working on a commercial product, we will consider upgrading to the Professional version. We need to identify how we will proceed with our projects, and based on that, we will decide on our licensing."